Now, I'm certainly not saying women are incapable of teaching a teenager, nor an adult how to learn. I'm saying generally, every female teacher I've ever had since the 9th grade, has sucked compared to the males.
Now call me sexist, but theres a few reasons why I think this. With males therees an instant respect between one another. I've never heard a child, my age group raise their voice to a male teacher in the classroom. Males are more dominant, bodily wise (No offense) and it seems to affect the students as well. Where as with a female, nearly every class people don't do their work, raise their voice, talk back, etc.
Women are programmed, naturally to raise the children. You may consider this sexist, but I disagree. Who makes a better Kingergarten teacher? Males or Females? Without the female in child raising, a child can lack the main qualities they need for their mind to develop. Such as trust, inferiority, and autonomy. Without the woman such qualities could be fairly hard for a child to develop propperly. When done by a man, qualities like mistrust, inferriority, and doubt seem to occur more often. Women are there to nurish, and nurture the child into a growing adult. From ages 12-19 an adolcent is undergoing an identity crisis more often than not. A male can really help navigate a child more so in this area, than a woman can.
Motivation. This is a more personal quality than anything. But when a woman tells me to do something, I'm kinda like fuck it almost as soon as she tells me to do it. Whereas a male tells me to do something I hop on it almost immediately in hopes for mutual respect.
A lot of these qualities are mostly personal, so for me a male is better than a female. The question is, in general, is a male teacher better than a female teacher for ages 13 on up?
Now call me sexist, but theres a few reasons why I think this. With males therees an instant respect between one another. I've never heard a child, my age group raise their voice to a male teacher in the classroom. Males are more dominant, bodily wise (No offense) and it seems to affect the students as well. Where as with a female, nearly every class people don't do their work, raise their voice, talk back, etc.
Women are programmed, naturally to raise the children. You may consider this sexist, but I disagree. Who makes a better Kingergarten teacher? Males or Females? Without the female in child raising, a child can lack the main qualities they need for their mind to develop. Such as trust, inferiority, and autonomy. Without the woman such qualities could be fairly hard for a child to develop propperly. When done by a man, qualities like mistrust, inferriority, and doubt seem to occur more often. Women are there to nurish, and nurture the child into a growing adult. From ages 12-19 an adolcent is undergoing an identity crisis more often than not. A male can really help navigate a child more so in this area, than a woman can.
Motivation. This is a more personal quality than anything. But when a woman tells me to do something, I'm kinda like fuck it almost as soon as she tells me to do it. Whereas a male tells me to do something I hop on it almost immediately in hopes for mutual respect.
A lot of these qualities are mostly personal, so for me a male is better than a female. The question is, in general, is a male teacher better than a female teacher for ages 13 on up?