Are you huffing paint and smoking crack at the same time?
That's a good question, are you smoking crack and huffing paint? B/c anyone with two eyes could clearly see Daniel Bryan on SD vs. Sin Cara(which btw he has been doing consistently since being drafted to SD). So, either you weren't watching SD closely, or you were too impaired to notice. An ironic statement by you in any context. Taking shots at me doesn't make your argument any more valid or correct.
Orton made Mark Henry look like gold at NOC. MARK HENRY. GOLD!!!
I never once said Orton sucked in the ring. But he could improve a little bit(as most wrestlers have room for improvement), though overall he's impressive for a guy his size. Orton has made Mark Henry look great in their fued, no doubt about it. You seem to be dismissing Mark Henry's work in the fued, as he is on a major role and has earned his push. It's not like Mark Henry had to be carried by Orton in order to have a great match. Sheamus and Christian could've done it as well, so Orton isn't single handedly making this fued interesting. Plenty of ppl here would disagree with that logic and rightfully so IMO.
Orton had a great match with Kane before Kane got added to Henry's House of Pain.
I'm again not disputing that Orton can have great matches, but you seem to place Orton on a pedestal. While he is a talented in ring worker, I'd hardly say he's the best in ring worker in the WWE currently. Punk and Bryan both have more solid in ring work, yet haven't been recognized as much. You marking out for Orton and not acknowledging talent objectively means any logic I provide will be shrugged off with flaming and ignorance.
Orton had a good match with Khali, its almost humanly impossible to have a good match with Khali, but somehow Orton pulled one out of him.
Really??? Cause I thought both Sheamus and Mark Henry both have had damn good matches with Khali. Thus proving your logic here is heavily biased and not viewing this subject fairly. Next to humanly impossible? Maybe so, but other guys have made Khali look decent in the ring and have had good matches. Hell, even guys like Batista have managed to pull good matches off with Khali, so IMO your statements don't hold much merit at all.
Orton and Rhodes have had some great battles these past few weeks, so did Orton and Christian, and these are just matches that have happened in the 4-6 months.
Again, I'm not saying Orton can't have good or even great matches from time to time. However, what I am saying is Orton is hardly the best or most talented in ring worker on the WWE payroll.
Orton made Punk look like a million fucking dollars at WM27, Orton can go with just about anyone he's in the ring against.
At the risk of repeating myself, yeah the match at WM this year was awesome. One misconception you seem to have though is that Orton carried Punk to a great match. Probably one of the most ridiculous statements I've seen here. Punk has had awesome matches with even the most mediocre wrestlers during his time in WWE. He's probably the best in ring worker in WWE right now. So, to claim he was carried by Orton and needed him as an opponent to look great is a laughable claim.
Punk is great. Punk has had some equally great matches in the past year. Hes great on the mic and great in ring, but when it comes down to wrestling, no one on the entire roster is better than Orton in the ring.
Wow, once again you state Orton is the best current worker in the WWE. I can certainly respect your opinion, but saying it's a fact is far from making it so. Guys like Punk and Bryan have the ability to work circles around Orton, but rarely have the opportunity to prove it. If given length in their matches, both can outshine and outperform Orton or anyone else currently on the roster. I don't doubt that Orton can either have great matches or carry his side of his fueds, but that doesn't automatically make him the best in WWE. Spouting it a hundred times here hardly legitimizes your claims. All it does is show how you feel, and doesn't necessarily represent facts. Neither does my views, but I'm not claiming something to be fact when it isn't.
As for Bryan, I just watched Smackdown and this so called great wrestler you speak of, wasn't on the fucking show whatsoever. Heath Slater made the show, and Bryan didn't. I get that people are in love with his Indy work, but since hes been in the WWE he hasn't done anything. And let me again point out that Unless it has happened in the WWE, it does not fucking matter. He may have Money in the Bank, but it hasn't done him any good at all, at this point I expect him to lose his briefcase to Zack Ryder because Ryder is 100x more over than Bryan.
You really must not be a fan of actual talent. Instead, it's apparent you buy into WWE's propaganda that both Orton and Cena are the best in WWE now. While arguments can certainly be made for that, I'd say guys like Punk and Bryan also show signs of being even better than Orton or Cena. Once again, I gotta re-iterate that Bryan
WAS ON SD THIS WEEK, HIS OPPONENT WAS SIN CARA. So, you obviously weren't paying attention to his role in the show. And you say I'm smoking crack or huffing paint? If anything, you're the one who's high if you didn't see him on the show.
As for his accomplishments not mattering outside of WWE, that is a very ignorant statement. How do you think WWE scouts talent for their future? You guessed it, by watching a guy's work not WWE related. Though you aren't a DB fan, clearly someone higher up and more important than you disagrees and sees potential in him. Hell HBK trained him and lobbied for him to be rehired when he was fired last year. You think he does that for any run of the mill, untalented wrestler?
Yeah, WWE could allow Ryder to win the MITB briefcase as he is way more over. I doubt it though, since Ryder has been pushed as a fluke that is lucky to even have a job. Plus, that would totally kill any momentum WWE had in making him the MITB winner for SD. Someone higher up thought he'd be a future champion in WWE, and I'm inclined to agree.