Leaning towards voting for Kong for obvious reasons but if someone wants to try and convince me to vote for Katie Lea, I may be swayed.
Yeah, don't be. Kong would and should win this match fairly easily. Which is a shame considering Katie Lea is basically Paige but better. I blame her seed on the fact that she was never used properly anywhere. WWE at one point wanted to seriously push her into an incest angle with her "brother" Paul Burchill. Oh, what riveting television that would have been.
Kong though, you'd think she'd be better suited as a novelty wrestler due to her size, but she's proven to be a great champion due to her agility and ability to work. She has a knack of making lesser foes look good, and good wrestlers look better. That's the trademark of an all time great. Moolah could do this, Burke could do this, Trish could do this... and they are elite for a reason. Kong should be too.
Plus when she's actually pushed she's incredibly dominant. In TNA she has winning records over big names like Gail Kim, Madison Rayne, and OBD. For a while she was pushed as
"the" cornerstone of the Knockouts divsion - not the side attraction like I suspect Havok will probably be - but the cornerstone, and TNA pulled some big ratings early on.
And I haven't even really touched on her work in Japan, Mexico, the Indy's, or the fact she's the 3rd woman to enter a Royal Rumble... and had a better showing than either Beth or Chyna in the process.
Kong should win here...