What? Did you even read my post? How is TNA's logic flawed? "hey, new show, but how do we make them watch?" "Why don't we give teasers to important info on the flagships who and have it expanded on by the complementary show?" "good idea". It makes perfect sense, ReAction is all about backstage happenings, so it makes sense to tease people into watching it.
What "Complimentary info?" If the point of the show is "this is the show to watch to make sense of what happened on Impact," as it seems to be designed to be, then there's a huge flaw in that logic.
These "backstage happenings" that you're referring to, are intended to explain why things happen. Case in point, Why the fuck did Tara join up with the chick that supposedly ended her career? Like I said in my first post, this show is supposed to explain the plot holes left over from Impact. But, since that;s the case, why not just stop putting fucking plot holes in Impact, and put more actual wrestling on the extra show?
Or, even better, why not just combine the two, and have it as a single 3 hour Impact each week, since Impact and ReAction have consecutive spots on the schedule. This way, you're not losing a single moment of either show, and you only have to set the DVR for a single show.
What? ReAction the behind the scenes show, how the fuck did you link that too Final Fantasy? And for the record, you're so wrong about FF7.
At least I admitted that my opinion on Final Fantasy 7 was exactly that. You're treating your opinion as the one and only fact on the subject, which stinks of ego. If you tilt your head down, and stop staring down your nose at people, you'll have a better view of what's actually going on.
But, that aside, I'll just repeat what I asked about plot holes. I notice that nobody's answered that one yet.
What the hell are you talking about? Hogan said he overruled Dixie, and?
Since you missed the point, entirely, let me try this again. Don't worry. I'll go slowly this time.
Hulk Hogan overruled Dixie about suspending Ric Flair.
Still with me? Good.
However, the reason he gave, on ReAction, for doing that was a rant about how the TNA Champion (Which is outside the Fourtune storyline) has to stand on his own.
Did you get that? Or, do I need to use smaller words?
And, as I asked before, what does Ric Flair have to do with that tournament?
By the way, this one's not a rhetorical question. (For people like Redd, that means I want someone to answer it.)
Please tell me what the fuck you're talking about. You're all over the place first you mentioned Hogan then Flair and something about World Titles, think your sentences through before you post them.
Actually, I gave a pretty good synapsis of waht Hulk Hogan said about the reason he revoked the suspension of Ric Flair. If what I said doesn't make sense to you, it's because what Hulk Hogan said doesn't make sense. Thanks for playing.
What exactly does this have to do with the thread? Did you reak Riaku's post? Do you even know what the topic is?
The point seemed to be that both TNA and Spike trust ReAction enough to not worry about it. And, frankly, the show's worse than Impact, so I tried to bring up points to question why anyone in their right mind would actually trust this trite.
Same as the question above, what the hell does this have to do with the OP? If you want to bitch about TNA go to the complaints section. Don't come into a thread with a very specific question and just spout out all the things you hate about TNA. It's completely irrelevant.
My point was that ReAction is such a bad show, even worse than Impact, that there should be no reason, whatsoever that it should be left on the air, at all. Frankly, if there's any justice in the world, ReAction won't be on the Spike schedule at all, after this one week hiatus. And, frankly, I want the hour of my life that I lost watching this shit back.
