Ive got a few more points having read through a very interesting topic.
Kane-I dont care what anyone says, since his debut at Bad Blood he has been over one way or another, hell he even survived that 'he shagged a corpse' storyline, the single worst story in wwe history. his loyalty is up there with Hardcore Holly and mask or no mask ,he deserves a decent title run. Anyone who disagrees, Taker is 45 and is sure to get a run again soon, hell he won the title twice at the last two WMS. Im a huge Taker mark so im not bitching there, my point is age doesnt matter. Kanes only a year older than HHH.
Shelton-I completely agree he isnt used well, but i also agree that he shouldnt be pushed too far too soon like Rock and Brock.Plus from what ive read he needs to motivate himself into reaching the next level. The guys uber talented.
Ken Shamrock-I dont know if he would have worked as a heavyweight champ, but he should've been in more mainevents than he was, excellent in the ring, fun to watch fight.
Raven, from the moment he debuted in wwe, i saw i feud with Taker. And it just never happened. Again someone good enough to mainevent against the likes of Taker or Mankind or Kane without having to be champ.
Shane Douglas-whats already been said is true, mainly the WCW stuff.
Mr Kennedy is criminally underused, talented all round. Bullshit if WWE hold him back because of steroids, id take any bet that several maineventers enjoy a steroid or two.
Ultimo Dragon-As anyone who knows his history or seen him perform, the way he was used by wwe was sickening, frankly.
RVD has to be one the biggest misuses, and if they didnt bring ECW back, he still wouldnt have been champ.
Kwang kicked ass.
You have to say WCW dropped the ball with Steve Austin, the guy can wrestler.
It always amazed me that Ron Simmons/Faarooq never got a WHC title run in WWE. As a heel champ he could've had some great matches with SCSA. The guy was the first ever black heavyweight champ, and other than the nation and apa, had fuck all in WWE.
I say it again, how different would WWE be today if politics didnt rule it. As far as im concerned, Taker and HBK are the only ones on the roster who should have any stroke.
I agree with anyone who said Perfect aswell. He was considerably over in 93, and anyone who remembers his IC match with Hitman knows he can work. I was only young when that match happened [22 now!] but ive got it on tape and its still a better match than alot of the stuff we've seen lately.
I cannot see the big deal about CM Punk.
Cena and Batista have moremor less had the same gimmicks since 2002, they need freshening up bigtime. JBLs character has run its course really, it worked when he first turned, but now it can be called misuse.
Biker Taker misused? I prefer deadman, but his return as a biker was HUGE, the place exploded. But things seemed to go stale fairly quickly for him, it just didnt seem right he went from the darkside to a harley. Ill bet Taker preferred it though, he more less played Mark Calloway.
Vader has been said, but it is very true, Maybe one of the few truly monster heels. Bad move with that one Vince.
I dont agree with Tazz, he was on his way out as has been said.
And the ball was well and truly dropped with Owen. A feud with Bret for the title would've bought a helluva buyrate