Yep. Because Seth Rollins is a heel. That's how heels use their MitB briefcase. It's also occasionally how faces win it when WWE want to see a heel get their comeuppance after cheating to retain their title.
Let's see if there's a point to this first section.
Yes. Lesnar destroyed Cena because that's how Lesnar was being built. And Rollins put up a pretty good fight for a heel at the Royal Rumble.
Still looking for a point.
He sure did!
Yeah, WWE doesn't book cowardly heels very well. Not sure what that has to do with Cena.
Gets pushed into a pole, actually.
Rollins had a few minutes where he stunned Lesnar. Even Heyman was looking worried for a little while. Apart from the blood, he did pretty much the same amount of damage as Reigns did at Wrestlemania, and more damage that Cena did at Summerslam.
Whole lotta complaining about Rollins' booking. No linking this to a valid reason to hate Cena. I'm losing patience.
Yep, Rollins has been booked as a weak champion. Again, nothing to do with Cena.
Because CM Punk was never really the big a draw. He had a few good months where his merch did well, and that's about it. Did nothing to help ratings, and apart from Hell in a Cell in 2012, did nothing to help Pay Per View buys. And it's not like he didn't get the chance, either. He got a shit ton of TV time in 2011 and 2012. But he got really boring, really fast. And that's coming from me, a big CM Punk fan.
But, again, Punk's booking and ability, or lack therof, is not John Cena's fault in the slightest.
Yep, just like there's been for decades. From Hogan to Austin to Rock to Triple H to Lesnar to Cena, there's always been someone who was above the title. But that's not a bad thing. It makes them seem like even more of a draw to have that mythical aura.
Clever them!
No, it's WWE's terrible booking that's hurting the booking, not the drawing ability of guys who are above the title.
But how? There's always been guys like that. Literally for decades.
Yeah, just like everyone knew that Punk isn't beating Cena, or Edge isn't beating Cena, or the Shield isn't beating Cena's team, or Sheamus isn't beating Cena, or Daniel Bryan isn't beating Cena, or like Owens isn't beating Cena. Like those guys, right?
But, again, Cena doesn't make the booking decisions.
True dat. But hey, it never hurts Lesnar to F5 a giant for a quick pop to keep him warm till the Undertaker rematch, right? But are you saying you want Big Show to win? That he's being held down and deserves a chance? I'm not sure what point you're trying make here.
Yeah, Owens is being trusted to try and help elevate the Intercontinental Title, something that was originally planned for Daniel Bryan. Poor Kev.
It's... Almost as if he's not ready to be elevated from the main card. Weird, huh?
What the fuck are you talking about? Reigns loses all the time. He's been squashed multiple times by the Wyatt family now that Strowman is around. Reigns has also lost at Wrestlemania. Because everyone knew that Reigns was going to win that night, remember? I believe he's list to Big Show once or twice. Aren't you in favour of Big Show winning?
And before that, he was injured for ages. So he wasn't doing much winning then. Except winning the battle against hernias!
Except, when Cena loses, you lot are one of the first people to mark the everloving fuck out and talk about what a great moment it is. If you thought there was always a chance of Cena losing, it wouldn't be as big a deal, and you wouldn't furiously finger yourself over something like Owens winning clean.
But again, Cena still has no choice in that matter. So you still have no reason to hate Cena.
Wait... So you're saying that the bigger, proven draws are trusted with headlining the biggest shows! Get the fuck outta here!
But again, it's not Cena's decision.
You Cena haters are such a dramatic bunch.
Yeah. I know when you were watching Owens beat Cena, you were complaining about how it's super unrealistic that Cena would lose to a nobody, instead of furiously fingering yourself.
Ah, making a statement of fact without the proof to back it up. The hallmark of every great argument.
Okay, I'm done replying because none of these things are reasons for you to hate Cena. Reasons for you to hate Vince? Sure. Reasons for you to hate the booking team and writers? Sure.
But John Cena isn't making any of the decisions that you disagree with. So essentially, you're hating somebody for something they can't control. Wait... Isn't that... Basically the definition of prejudice.
Holy shit, you guys! It can't possibly be that Cena haters are prejudiced twatbags who just complain and whine regardless of what Cena does because their baes aren't getting pushed?
Also, lol at trying to ignore the fact that Reigns is a new star that isn't Cena, Lesnar or Taker. Because it doesn't count as a new star being created if it's not a star that the IWC approves of as they rage behind their computer screen, getting Doritos dust everywhere.
You are guys are pathetic. If I cared enough, I'd feel sorry for you.