after watching the ziggler vs kingston 2 out of 3 falls match on raw, dont you think that kingston won 2 of the 3 falls and should be the us champion again?
i am no fan of kingston and really like ziggler a lot, but the sitpulations for the match are the winner of 2 falls wins. kingston won 2 of the 3 falls. 1 by pin and 1 by dq. they technically had 3 separate matches in 1. if they go by the logic they used on raw then if a person has a disqualification fall in an iron man match then it would be over? or if ziggler got disqualified during the first or second fall would the match be over?
so do you think it made sense that ziggler got disqualified for the whole match or do you think that kingston should be the champ now after winning 2 of the 3 falls?
i am no fan of kingston and really like ziggler a lot, but the sitpulations for the match are the winner of 2 falls wins. kingston won 2 of the 3 falls. 1 by pin and 1 by dq. they technically had 3 separate matches in 1. if they go by the logic they used on raw then if a person has a disqualification fall in an iron man match then it would be over? or if ziggler got disqualified during the first or second fall would the match be over?
so do you think it made sense that ziggler got disqualified for the whole match or do you think that kingston should be the champ now after winning 2 of the 3 falls?