Frozen Fire
Dark Match Winner
Okay.... I didn't know what better title to give to my post but i hope it conveys my point..
I was watching clips on youtube of the Corporate-Ministry angle and it made me realize why i loved WWE during that period (I still like it, but not as much). During that time, I think in 1999, Austin and Rock were the top faces of the company with Austin being the WWE champion.. on the other hand, HHH and Undertaker were heels. just a few months earlier, I think, the Rock was the heel and HHH was a face as part of DX. now these 4 superstars were almost at the same level when it came to fan reaction towards them (Austin and Rock were definitely more over than HHH but still comparatively even HHH got massive heat.) then we had guys like Mick Foley, Kane and Big Show filling up the upper mid-card. so with the 4 main guys all getting similar reaction, it gave the creative the opportunity to turn them Face or heel much more easily without having to worry about the top Face and top Heel positions being empty and without merchandise sales dropping. plus, even if the same guys were in the main-event all the time the feud still remained fresh because the superstars played different roles going into each match.
so now coming to my point, right now, in the WWE there is only 1 top Face (Cena) and 1 top-heel (keeps changing every feud). even when Randy Orton was on Raw his character wasn't built to the extent, that the rafters shook when he made his entrance.
the problem with having only 1 Face is, that even when John Cena is being booed in almost every arena by atleast 30% of people in attendance (its much more but 30% sounds like a safe figure) they cannot turn him heel because they have no one to fill that void he'll leave. hence, his character, as stale as it might have become, cannot be changed.
I feel if WWE can push some1 to John Cena's level, the story-lines will be much better as it'll give the writers some maneuvering space without having to put Cena in the main-event at every PPV. your thoughts please.
I was watching clips on youtube of the Corporate-Ministry angle and it made me realize why i loved WWE during that period (I still like it, but not as much). During that time, I think in 1999, Austin and Rock were the top faces of the company with Austin being the WWE champion.. on the other hand, HHH and Undertaker were heels. just a few months earlier, I think, the Rock was the heel and HHH was a face as part of DX. now these 4 superstars were almost at the same level when it came to fan reaction towards them (Austin and Rock were definitely more over than HHH but still comparatively even HHH got massive heat.) then we had guys like Mick Foley, Kane and Big Show filling up the upper mid-card. so with the 4 main guys all getting similar reaction, it gave the creative the opportunity to turn them Face or heel much more easily without having to worry about the top Face and top Heel positions being empty and without merchandise sales dropping. plus, even if the same guys were in the main-event all the time the feud still remained fresh because the superstars played different roles going into each match.
so now coming to my point, right now, in the WWE there is only 1 top Face (Cena) and 1 top-heel (keeps changing every feud). even when Randy Orton was on Raw his character wasn't built to the extent, that the rafters shook when he made his entrance.
the problem with having only 1 Face is, that even when John Cena is being booed in almost every arena by atleast 30% of people in attendance (its much more but 30% sounds like a safe figure) they cannot turn him heel because they have no one to fill that void he'll leave. hence, his character, as stale as it might have become, cannot be changed.
I feel if WWE can push some1 to John Cena's level, the story-lines will be much better as it'll give the writers some maneuvering space without having to put Cena in the main-event at every PPV. your thoughts please.