Without X Pac....

Discussion in 'Old School Wrestling' started by relentless1, Dec 20, 2018.

  1. relentless1

    relentless1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2011
    Messages:
    577
    Likes Received:
    91
    X Pac was possibly the most crucial factor to the tide turning against WCW in early 1998 other than Austin/McMahon.

    When X Pac came back to the WWF several things happened:

    - He helped give legitimacy to DX after HBKs departure

    - his inflammatory comments towards Bischoff and Hogan set the stage for the DX invasion; a paramount angle in the turining of the tide

    - Hall and Nash stopped being creative contributors in WCW after their Kliq buddy was canned

    - It showed the fans and both companies that viable talent could and would move in the other direction as well; that money wasn't the sole contributing factor in a wrestlers decision as to where he'd work, meaning that Bischoff and co didn't have the best bait any more in regards to poaching talent


    anybody agree or disagree with that statement?
     
    #1
  2. Wald

    Wald Mid-Card Championship Winner

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    Messages:
    1,023
    Likes Received:
    236
    I think he was important as he brought some of the nWo cool with him and his Bischoff shoot gave Raw that element of being real. After that though? Not sure how important he was. The New Age Outlaws are what really got that version of DX over as babyfaces.

    Only other point, I wouldn't use the word crucial for any wrestler in turning the tide against WCW that isn't named Stone Cold Steve Austin. He won the Monday Night Wars on his own.
     
    #2
    TheWrestlingSage and tdmoon like this.
  3. Goldie

    Goldie Getting Noticed By Management

    Joined:
    May 8, 2012
    Messages:
    293
    Likes Received:
    36
    He was a factor but not the turning point.
    XPac was not a major draw.... his association with buddies in high places helped his career, but remember by the year 2000, fans were openly booing xpac because they found him so boring.
    Heck during the Invasion angle of 2001- fans cheered Billy Kidman against Xpac (when WCW were meant to be heels and WWE the faces).

    The timing was perfect for xpac rejoining WWE (and xpacs promo where he dissed Bsichoff & Hogan was one of his better ones) as the company gained massive momentum in early 1998, but it was Steve Austin that was the major factor in the WWEs return to dominance.
    Sure there were smaller factors such as DX, Rock (remember Rock was still developing at this point), Attitude era, WCW getting stale....and to an extent Xpacs promo.... but Austin vs Vince was red hot and if there was one reason you can single out, its Austin vs McMahon.
    XPacs return was a welcome addition to DX, but most crucial reason? Not for me.
    XPac was no Steve Austin
     
    #3

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"