Dude, our tax dollars are going to go to waste no matter what. There are plenty of states in this country that haven't seen a big MMA or Boxing event in years and they're struggling just like the rest of us. And if it's costing the government too much to drug test MMA and Boxing athletes in certain states, then they should stop doing it. Simple as that.
Also, where's the guarantee that if the UFC starts drug testing their fighters that the athletic commissions will then stop doing their own test? Like you said, Golden Boy Promotions do their own testing (and that's ONLY because Floyd Mayweather wants to make sure he doesn't step in there with someone who's on the juice), yet their boxers still get tested by the athletic commissions. Why would the UFC be any different?
There aren't any guarantees, but company wide, random drug testing would go a long way toward ensuring that the UFC is doing a better job than they are. Your argument here is weak. Your entire argument seems like nothing more than a chance for you to tell me I'm wrong, for what ever reason.
You said there's nothing wrong with it the way it is, but I've shown you that things are wrong. You then said let these commissions run themselves into the ground, but that happens on the taxpayer dime. Finally, you've said our tax dollars are wasted no matter what, so who cares.
Absolute none of these points are logical. I have shown you 3 different states that are either under investigation, broke, or both. I've given you a mountain of evidence to support the case and you've fired back with that stuff.
I'm done with conversation unless you have something to contribute that isn't you just being a contrarian.
CSAC is broke:
http://espn.go.com/mma/story/_/id/8179259/embattled-california-state-athletic-commission-head-george-dodd-resigns
Oregon SAC is under investigation:
http://mmajunkie.com/news/29426/oregon-state-athletic-commission-executive-director-on-leave-pending-investigation.mma
How about this quote from Mike Chiappetta:
Even stateside, there are problems. The state of Washington only has mandatory testing for title bouts. Other states, like Louisiana, have no formally written testing policy at all
from this article:
http://www.mmafighting.com/ufc/2012/3/30/2913720/ped-in-mma-steroids-mike-chiappetta-trt-athletic-commission-testing-mma-news
Athlete's caught since 2002:
http://www.cagepotato.com/mma-steroid-busts-definitive-timeline/
Here's Kevin Iole laying out that it would cost the UFC LESS to do it themselves:
http://sports.yahoo.com/mma/news?slug=ki-iole_alistair_overeem_failed_test_dana_white_040412
If I say up, you'll say down. If I say left, you'll say right.
I've heard your opinions, but you're not backing them up with anything. I've given you evidence that your claims are incorrect. Everything is NOT fine. All of the evidence points to the fact that the athletic commissions are, at best, causing more problems than fixing them. One of the biggest states in the nation, California, can't keep doing this. They'll add almost a million dollars to an already compounding debt.
I just showed you an article from Mike Chiappetta that the UFC, in certain cases, will reimburse the state for the testing. They're already paying for it. By the way, that state is Louisiana. UFC reimburses Louisiana for all its testing.
Here's a quote from Louisiana's BWC chair!
Alvin Topham, who chairs the Louisiana Boxing and Wrestling Commission, detailed that process during an interview with MMA Fighting.
When the UFC comes to the state, as they did last September, they insist upon drug testing. The commission will administer the tests, select a laboratory to process them, and pay the initial bill. They will also be the first to receive the results, which they will eventually pass along to the UFC.
The promotion later reimburses them for the cost.
The reason for this setup? The expense. Topham told MMA Fighting that the commission doesn’t receive a single cent of funding from the state government. Instead, it is self-funded through event gate taxes and licensing. The costs of random testing all events would quickly whittle away their cash reserves, so instead, they concentrate on major shows, using the deeper pockets of bigger promotions like UFC and Bellator to pay for the screenings.
"They’re footing the bill, but the way we’re doing it is safeguarding against impropriety," said Topham, who has served on the commission since 1992. "If anyone questions my integrity, that’s fine. They can say what they want to say. But I have no investment in the UFC. I don’t work for them. This is an arrangement, and we’re ultimately administering the testing."
Louisiana gets it paid for by the UFC while we continue to go broke. I'm starting to understand why you don't care.
We can agree to disagree.