Hi,
For this year Wrestlemania 27 we have a lot of good matches, The Miz vs. John Cena promises to be the clash of the hottest heel in the industry today against the face of the company with The Rock somehow in the middle of these two guys.
Also, we have Undertaker's streak against Triple H, Cody Rhodes versus Rey Mysterio, Snooki Tag Team Match, Cole vs. Lawler, etc.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not here to bash the card or the wrestlers, I think the card is just fine and we will probably gonna have the greatest show of the year. But if you take this card and put in on, let's say for example, Summerslam, the matches wouldn't be so easy to guess who is going to win. Wrestlemania has that feeling that it's the beginning or the end of storylines, the matches are made to be great, and the wrestlers preform at their best, but if you take Rey Mysterio vs. Cody Rhodes you gonna guess it right nine times out of ten who is going to win it, but if this match happened at Summerslam you would say that Cody Rhodes would have a chance at winning.
Because Wrestlemania is the place for the big faces of the company to shine (Orton, Austin and a few others are rare cases of the opposite) it almost feels too much predictable. Of course, Undertaker vs. Triple H needs to be 'predictable', everybody will say that Triple H will lose, he has to, of course you couldn't take this match and put in on Summerslam, because the whole storyline revolves about Taker's undefeated streak.
I don't know if the point I'm trying to make is clear or not, but I feel that because Wrestlemania is the biggest show of the year, World Wrestling Entertainment gives us results we want to see, John Cena beating Miz (face vs. heel), Rey Mysterio beating Rhodes (face vs. heel) and also Orton beating Punk (face vs. heel), I get that the show needs to end with the face on top, but that doesn't mean that heels can't win matches...
Does it help buyrates? I don't think so. If Undertaker and Cena win their matches, everyone will watch it anyway. It doesn't really matter if Cody beat Mysterio or Punk beat Orton, would it help their buyrates if they let the heels beat the faces? It wouldn't hurt, and in the long run it would help them getting bigger buyrates for let's say the next PPV, Extreme Rules, if one of your strongest faces Rey Mysterio or Orton lose at the Wrestlemania you will want to see the rematch, if they win at Wrestlemania, what's the point? A different stipulation? They just proved they could beat them...
So my questions are: Do you feel that predictability on the winners of Wrestlemania matches might hurt your opinion of the show? Should WWE let some heels beat faces? If so, would it help the buyrates for next shows?
PS: This thread isn't only about this year Wrestlemania, I felt this way about last year's, and previous years. But this year, I'm not seeing many heels beating faces, and that doesn't look good if you don't believe that any one in a match can beat the other, right?
For this year Wrestlemania 27 we have a lot of good matches, The Miz vs. John Cena promises to be the clash of the hottest heel in the industry today against the face of the company with The Rock somehow in the middle of these two guys.
Also, we have Undertaker's streak against Triple H, Cody Rhodes versus Rey Mysterio, Snooki Tag Team Match, Cole vs. Lawler, etc.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not here to bash the card or the wrestlers, I think the card is just fine and we will probably gonna have the greatest show of the year. But if you take this card and put in on, let's say for example, Summerslam, the matches wouldn't be so easy to guess who is going to win. Wrestlemania has that feeling that it's the beginning or the end of storylines, the matches are made to be great, and the wrestlers preform at their best, but if you take Rey Mysterio vs. Cody Rhodes you gonna guess it right nine times out of ten who is going to win it, but if this match happened at Summerslam you would say that Cody Rhodes would have a chance at winning.
Because Wrestlemania is the place for the big faces of the company to shine (Orton, Austin and a few others are rare cases of the opposite) it almost feels too much predictable. Of course, Undertaker vs. Triple H needs to be 'predictable', everybody will say that Triple H will lose, he has to, of course you couldn't take this match and put in on Summerslam, because the whole storyline revolves about Taker's undefeated streak.
I don't know if the point I'm trying to make is clear or not, but I feel that because Wrestlemania is the biggest show of the year, World Wrestling Entertainment gives us results we want to see, John Cena beating Miz (face vs. heel), Rey Mysterio beating Rhodes (face vs. heel) and also Orton beating Punk (face vs. heel), I get that the show needs to end with the face on top, but that doesn't mean that heels can't win matches...
Does it help buyrates? I don't think so. If Undertaker and Cena win their matches, everyone will watch it anyway. It doesn't really matter if Cody beat Mysterio or Punk beat Orton, would it help their buyrates if they let the heels beat the faces? It wouldn't hurt, and in the long run it would help them getting bigger buyrates for let's say the next PPV, Extreme Rules, if one of your strongest faces Rey Mysterio or Orton lose at the Wrestlemania you will want to see the rematch, if they win at Wrestlemania, what's the point? A different stipulation? They just proved they could beat them...
So my questions are: Do you feel that predictability on the winners of Wrestlemania matches might hurt your opinion of the show? Should WWE let some heels beat faces? If so, would it help the buyrates for next shows?
PS: This thread isn't only about this year Wrestlemania, I felt this way about last year's, and previous years. But this year, I'm not seeing many heels beating faces, and that doesn't look good if you don't believe that any one in a match can beat the other, right?