Why Curtis Axel should have won the Royal Rumble

Rusty

Is hanging up the boots
curtis-axel-1415191788-2290200.jpg

Just look at that face. This is the face of a man who would screwed out of the Royal Rumble match, being attacked by Erick Rowan and had his spot in the match STOLEN.

FACTS:

Curtis Axel was never eliminated, Roman Reigns went over the top rope, therefore Axel actually won the match.

A Axel victory would have been better received than the Reigns victory.

He was a Paul Heyman guy... Brock Lesnar is a Paul Heyman guy... the story practically writes itself.

Axel frequently appears on NXT I believe, and NXT is the flagship show of the company right now, therefore he is a bigger star than than Roman Reigns, who has not appeared on NXT in years.

Give the people what they want, and immediately enter this man in the match for the WWE Title at Wrestlemania.
 
Барбоса;5112805 said:
In the past, a competitor has had until the next man enters the ring to take his spot in the Rumble.

Axel was eliminated when the Boogeyman entered the ring.

Thought for sure this would be about Barbosa...
 
If that's the case Spike Dudley won the Rumble in 2004.
 
In 1991 from the 18 spot future HOFer The Macho King Randy Savage should be rewritten as the winner.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,837
Messages
3,300,747
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top