Mustang Sally
Sells seashells by the seashore
In the past, Vince McMahon ran things only one way; his way. Everyone who worked for him apparently had to sign contracts that called for them to perform the way he wanted; presumably at his beck and call. They could appear nowhere else, make no mention of their wrestling past with other organizations
.and had to travel the whole damn year with virtually no breaks.
Then, came a few performers who possessed creative control of their characters ..theres no telling how this ever came about, given McMahons tyrannical ways, but people like Hulk Hogan and Bret Hart had at least partial say over what management wanted them to do: when you consider the results, with both these guys leaving the company with hard feelings, Vince probably wished he had never agreed to it in the first place. Still, the concept of creative control was here to stay and performers with pull surely wanted it in their contracts.
The thing is, who has that pull? It isnt just creative control Im talking about; its a matter of who in todays WWE has the real or implied power to force Vince to back down .at least occasionally. I looked at the roster and could come up with only a handful, with each having his own story.
Undertaker: For sure. Im presuming he wanted to retire outright several years ago but Vince didnt want to let him go. Mark Calaway probably told Vince he could have the services of Taker, but only on the performers terms. Before Undertaker, who really could get things done in this manner? To wrestle once a year? Be paid a boatload of money (presumably) to do it? With Taker, it probably isnt a matter of creative control; I doubt he cares how hes used and is happy to go along with what Creative comes up with. But theres no question whos in charge here. He can leave whenever he wants and Vince knows Taker doesnt need WWE in his life anymore. Thats power.
John Cena: We dont know if he uses the power or how he uses it but just the magnitude of his fame and influence surely calls for his inclusion on this list. We dont know what this guy gets in salary and from sale of merchandise, but it must be enormous. We dont know if hes really the nice guy he seems to be, but even while Id like to think he is, he doubtless knows the kind of power he wields in WWE ..perhaps even to the point if they try to dissuade him from demanding something he wants by invoking his contract, he could tell them to stick it in their hats; meaning that if they try to fire him or even take him to court, he could laugh at them because he knows his worth and is aware the company simply cant afford to lose him. At the same time, hes not Hulk Hogan, demanding to be cast as the conquering hero wherever he goes. Instead, Cena allows himself to be depicted as a flawed human being who takes his share of beatings. For you folks on this forum who hate the SuperCena who kicks out of every pinning combination, I give you the guy who turned tail and ran from the ring when pursued by all seven members of Nexus: can you imagine Hogan agreeing to do that? I give you the man who agreed to be bested repeatedly by C.M. Punk. I give you the guy who agreed to lose to Lord Tensai, for the good of the storyline. Hes a company man with power. Jeez.
C.M. Punk: This one really enters unknown territory. Phil Brooks entire persona is based on what happened in the Summer of Punk two years ago, a scenario that leaves us with no idea how much was real (if any) and how much was storyline. He insisted he had one foot out the door, although one has to wonder what he would have done with his life and career had he really left the biggest showcase for pro wrestling in the world. Still, some of this stuff must have been true: who gets a world title reign of over 400 days? Who in WWE gets a long vacation that finally ends this Sunday? Who gets to sit cross-legged in the center of the ring to deliver rambling dissertations in that incomparable style of his? Does he have the power to tell WWE whats going to go down? What do the terms of his contract really allow him to dictate? Or is he simply just another employee of the company who performs as directed? It would be nice to know yet, not knowing is part of the fascination with C.M. Punk.
Brock Lesnar: In his case, I doubt creative control has anything to do with it; I believe the company sits down with Brock and his representatives (not Paul Heyman; Im talking about his attorneys and agents) at contract time and hammers out what Brock will be doing in the coming year. Heaven knows, theres not a lot of ground to cover since he appears so rarely. Unlike a lot of WWE programming, there probably arent re-writes, and Brock has to be consulted and agree to any changes the company might want to make along the way. This is power just in the uniqueness of the contract; theres almost no precedent for this type of thing in WWE history. I wouldnt be surprised if the rest of the roster hates Brocks deal, yet the idea of capturing him as an attraction was too much for Vince to resist.
The Rock: Theres hardly a reason to go into it, is there? See Brock ..and add in the fact that Rock doesnt need WWE financially to make a rather secure living. Hes wrestling because he wants to .hes doing it because his fans want to see him. He doesnt have to do any of it. Thats power.
Chris Jericho: Again, I dont think creative control is something Jericho cares about; hes probably happy to go along with whatever is written for him. Thats not to say they dont run things by him; his legendary status merits it. His willingness to portray whatever type of character is needed makes him a great asset for the company. The power in Y2Js contract is in his ability to call the shots as far as when hell perform .not how, but when. We read that after WM29, Chris would be gone for a few months; yet, hes still here. However, we know hell disappear to be an aging rocker sooner or later, and the storyline will have to be adjusted to accommodate him. Now, thats power. Anyone who thinks power always involves creative control should consider Chris Jericho.
Big Show: His seniority and uniqueness as a performer might bring him some power, yet weve never read anything about him being demanding or unreasonable. Could be he is that way but chooses to not air his gripes in public, a la Punk. Paul Wight might have a degree of creative control because hes been around so long, yet I doubt hed have much call to use it.
Randy Orton: His shenanigans early in his career might have damaged the power he was building. Hes important, but might have gained greater power within the company had he not behaved like a spoiled child. The fact the company suspended him a couple times might have served to show he didnt have the power he thought he did. Randy might have believed he was such an enormous attraction he could afford to call his shots, but subsequent events undid all that. He might have looked at Cena and figured he had equal pull, only to find he was dead wrong.
Have I missed anyone in todays WWE? Obviously, I dont include Triple H because hes management, not a performer whose contract depends on what he does in the ring. But is there anyone else who commands the power to tell, rather than be told?
Then, came a few performers who possessed creative control of their characters ..theres no telling how this ever came about, given McMahons tyrannical ways, but people like Hulk Hogan and Bret Hart had at least partial say over what management wanted them to do: when you consider the results, with both these guys leaving the company with hard feelings, Vince probably wished he had never agreed to it in the first place. Still, the concept of creative control was here to stay and performers with pull surely wanted it in their contracts.
The thing is, who has that pull? It isnt just creative control Im talking about; its a matter of who in todays WWE has the real or implied power to force Vince to back down .at least occasionally. I looked at the roster and could come up with only a handful, with each having his own story.
Undertaker: For sure. Im presuming he wanted to retire outright several years ago but Vince didnt want to let him go. Mark Calaway probably told Vince he could have the services of Taker, but only on the performers terms. Before Undertaker, who really could get things done in this manner? To wrestle once a year? Be paid a boatload of money (presumably) to do it? With Taker, it probably isnt a matter of creative control; I doubt he cares how hes used and is happy to go along with what Creative comes up with. But theres no question whos in charge here. He can leave whenever he wants and Vince knows Taker doesnt need WWE in his life anymore. Thats power.
John Cena: We dont know if he uses the power or how he uses it but just the magnitude of his fame and influence surely calls for his inclusion on this list. We dont know what this guy gets in salary and from sale of merchandise, but it must be enormous. We dont know if hes really the nice guy he seems to be, but even while Id like to think he is, he doubtless knows the kind of power he wields in WWE ..perhaps even to the point if they try to dissuade him from demanding something he wants by invoking his contract, he could tell them to stick it in their hats; meaning that if they try to fire him or even take him to court, he could laugh at them because he knows his worth and is aware the company simply cant afford to lose him. At the same time, hes not Hulk Hogan, demanding to be cast as the conquering hero wherever he goes. Instead, Cena allows himself to be depicted as a flawed human being who takes his share of beatings. For you folks on this forum who hate the SuperCena who kicks out of every pinning combination, I give you the guy who turned tail and ran from the ring when pursued by all seven members of Nexus: can you imagine Hogan agreeing to do that? I give you the man who agreed to be bested repeatedly by C.M. Punk. I give you the guy who agreed to lose to Lord Tensai, for the good of the storyline. Hes a company man with power. Jeez.
C.M. Punk: This one really enters unknown territory. Phil Brooks entire persona is based on what happened in the Summer of Punk two years ago, a scenario that leaves us with no idea how much was real (if any) and how much was storyline. He insisted he had one foot out the door, although one has to wonder what he would have done with his life and career had he really left the biggest showcase for pro wrestling in the world. Still, some of this stuff must have been true: who gets a world title reign of over 400 days? Who in WWE gets a long vacation that finally ends this Sunday? Who gets to sit cross-legged in the center of the ring to deliver rambling dissertations in that incomparable style of his? Does he have the power to tell WWE whats going to go down? What do the terms of his contract really allow him to dictate? Or is he simply just another employee of the company who performs as directed? It would be nice to know yet, not knowing is part of the fascination with C.M. Punk.
Brock Lesnar: In his case, I doubt creative control has anything to do with it; I believe the company sits down with Brock and his representatives (not Paul Heyman; Im talking about his attorneys and agents) at contract time and hammers out what Brock will be doing in the coming year. Heaven knows, theres not a lot of ground to cover since he appears so rarely. Unlike a lot of WWE programming, there probably arent re-writes, and Brock has to be consulted and agree to any changes the company might want to make along the way. This is power just in the uniqueness of the contract; theres almost no precedent for this type of thing in WWE history. I wouldnt be surprised if the rest of the roster hates Brocks deal, yet the idea of capturing him as an attraction was too much for Vince to resist.
The Rock: Theres hardly a reason to go into it, is there? See Brock ..and add in the fact that Rock doesnt need WWE financially to make a rather secure living. Hes wrestling because he wants to .hes doing it because his fans want to see him. He doesnt have to do any of it. Thats power.
Chris Jericho: Again, I dont think creative control is something Jericho cares about; hes probably happy to go along with whatever is written for him. Thats not to say they dont run things by him; his legendary status merits it. His willingness to portray whatever type of character is needed makes him a great asset for the company. The power in Y2Js contract is in his ability to call the shots as far as when hell perform .not how, but when. We read that after WM29, Chris would be gone for a few months; yet, hes still here. However, we know hell disappear to be an aging rocker sooner or later, and the storyline will have to be adjusted to accommodate him. Now, thats power. Anyone who thinks power always involves creative control should consider Chris Jericho.
Big Show: His seniority and uniqueness as a performer might bring him some power, yet weve never read anything about him being demanding or unreasonable. Could be he is that way but chooses to not air his gripes in public, a la Punk. Paul Wight might have a degree of creative control because hes been around so long, yet I doubt hed have much call to use it.
Randy Orton: His shenanigans early in his career might have damaged the power he was building. Hes important, but might have gained greater power within the company had he not behaved like a spoiled child. The fact the company suspended him a couple times might have served to show he didnt have the power he thought he did. Randy might have believed he was such an enormous attraction he could afford to call his shots, but subsequent events undid all that. He might have looked at Cena and figured he had equal pull, only to find he was dead wrong.
Have I missed anyone in todays WWE? Obviously, I dont include Triple H because hes management, not a performer whose contract depends on what he does in the ring. But is there anyone else who commands the power to tell, rather than be told?