Yes i know its a tribute but lets be honest... He surely wouldnt want to keep doing it now... It was great at first as a bit of entertainment but they should be moving him on now
And what do you propose he do? Wrestle as "Jay Lethal, the black guy with cornrows"? Black Machismo was a poor gimmick that Lethal managed to salvage to a point where he is/was over with the fans. If a gimmick works then it stays until it stops generating a response.
This is my point... it's poor writing... Why does he have to copy the other guys attire if he's his mentor? it's just Lazy writing... It's like Samoa Joe and Taz now. Samoa Joe keeps folding his arms like Taz and its just done because he used to do it... Were trying to develop talent for the future not stay with the past!
It isn't lazy writing, it isn't even writing it's costume design. Secondly showing a connection between a wrestler and his mentor is pretty standard, it implies that the protege respects their mentor. Which assisted Williams in his program with Steiner, In case you missed that Petey assumed he was safe from the MEM due to him being Steiner's friend, Steiner turned on him an it lead to Steiner criticizing Williams as a wannabe which lead to a match where Steiner reclaimed his headdress. It was symbolic of their relationship as wrestlers and overrall it was one of the more interesting aspects of the MEM storyline.
Same goes for Joe and Taz, Taz was an unstoppable force in ECW and Joe has been for most of his TNA career, fans were already drawing comparisons between the two so TNA did the smart thing and brought them together. That's good writing not lazy writing.
Basically Creed hasn't done ANYTHING for months... i was using it as an example of how they try to put people over... by picking something that has already been done and running with it. It's lazy
What? Because it was done in a movie from the 70's? Newsflash "Everything in wrestling has been done before". Here's the question you need to ask; "Did Creed's gimmick get him over with the crowd?" (Answer: yes) therefore it worked. It doesn't matter if it was based on a movie character it's still effective.
I was making a generalised comment about my concerns (not complaining) about the creative direction for TNA (which included lethal consequences) and how they poor book storylines and characters, im sorry ive mentioned a wrestler not currently performing for the promotion.
A wrestler's gimmick has very little to do with the booking process and beyond that it serves little purpose beyond connecting with the crowd, so "Did these wrestlers make a connection with the audience" arguably each of them mae a connection with the TNA audience with Williams probably being the stand out so your point is moot, you don't like the gimmick but if the gimmick works for the majority then it's done it's job.