I was just watching CNN and they were talking about some new article which discussed how the Michael Vick story may or may not have been different if he were white rather than black. While I have not read the article myself, I understand that it analyzes the hypothetical effect of Vick's skin color on his life: on his career pre-incarceration, his time in jail, his perception by the public due to the dogfighting crime, and his eventual return to and success in the NFL. It even featured a picture of Vick as a Caucasian.
Apparently the writer of the article is pissed off because the title of the article was changed and the picture was a late addition, which he was uninformed of. Either way, it has apparently sparked heated debates from lots of people. ESPN stands by their position, but it has sparked a lot of controversy.
Any of you guys read this yet? What are your thoughts, whether or not you have read it?
Apparently the writer of the article is pissed off because the title of the article was changed and the picture was a late addition, which he was uninformed of. Either way, it has apparently sparked heated debates from lots of people. ESPN stands by their position, but it has sparked a lot of controversy.
Any of you guys read this yet? What are your thoughts, whether or not you have read it?