What could've been...? Val Venis

Showtime

It's Showtime!
A thread started a while ago asking what was the point of Val Venis. I began to think back to the late 90's and wonder myself why and how he became the new Brooklyn Brawler. Val Venis was one of many young rising talents in the last few years of the 90's. His character was over whether he was face or heel, he was a multiple IC champion and had matches with several top stars including Austin and The Rock. True, the porno star gimmick may not have been mainevent material, but the WWE could've changed it, remember Austin started out as The Ringmaster with Ted Dibiase. Back in 98/99 if you were to pick which of these 3 would win a world title, Venis, Bradshaw, or Mark Henry, (k, let's just pretend the ECW title is a legitimate title in this case) most people would've picked Venis. The funny thing is, Bradshaw and Henry had less successful middlecard tenures than Venis, yet both became World Champion, while Venis hit a wall in 2000/01 and never fully recovered.

So the questions, why didn't Val get his mainevent push? what stopped it from happening? And what if he did get his big push could he have become World Champion, or a solid middlecarder?

I think what stopped Val's push from happening were a number of reasons. 1) He began in the Austin/Rock/HHH era. Those three along with Undertaker were a part of every mainevent title fued from 98-01. 2) WCW's collapse. Big Show, Jericho, Benoit, Eddie, Booker T, Goldberg Nash Hogan Flair and Stiener for a while, all either signed before or after WCW's collapse and became maineventers from 99 to 04. Val was a multiple time IC champion, but never really was consistently dominant, never really going long stretches of dominance and always disappearing and re-appearing. His pushs were never the best, and the problem always seemed the WWE would always give up on them early, like his stint with T&A, RTC and his Chef Morley tenure. WIth a solid push like they gave Shelton or MVP, Val might've been able to become a dominant IC champ. I doubt he would've ever become WWE champion,especially with his gimmick, but if they changed it up sooner, like when he made his return in 2002, he may have progresses to mainevent.

His gimmick was becoming stale when the brought him back in 2002, they even tried re-naming him The Big Valbowski, so in 2003 they gave him a serious gimmick as Bishoff's assistant. This should've been the time to push him hard and over as a heel, not just in a power position, but to also to have him win a few matches, act kinda how Regal was briefly during his GM tenure, A man in power that is also a good wrestler. However, WWE did neither of these, making him look like Bishoff's pathetic wimpy assistant and looking almost as weak in the ring as Johnny Nitro did when he debuted as Bishoffs apprentice. Yes he was Tag Team champ with Lance Storm, but he awarded himself the title when Regal was injured, and I think they lost in either there first or second defence, but either way, putting a title on himself and then losing it quickly never looks good. After he got canned by Bishoff, he settled back into his old gimmick, formed a minorly successful tag team with Visera that got a title match, and has slowly transformed into this generations version of the Brooklyn Brawler with an occasional win, which isn't neccessarly a bad thing. He is a good wrestler, is willing to put anyone over and make them look good (which is always needed), and it is a steady job and a steady paycheck. Val may never get in the HOF, but he should because he's a class act, he's never made a big scene or had alot of backstage heat, and he's a solid talent, in the ring and out of the ring.

So thoughts? Could Val have been pushed farther, or was he never really mainevent good? What held him back?
 
First I think this is the longest and most passionate post one can make about Val Venis, the PEOPLES jobber, and for that I commend you.

So the questions, why didn't Val get his mainevent push? what stopped it from happening? And what if he did get his big push could he have become World Champion, or a solid middlecarder?
The truth is he just wasn't good enough for the main event but there is no shame in being a solid mid-carder and for a while he WAS one of those. He didn't get a main event push because he didn't shine like The Rock or Austin. You can look at a few of matches back then and there was always a reasonable amount of noise for him in comparison to the mid-carders of today. That's largely because the fans made noise for anyone back then, wrestling was the in thing and people could not get enough of it so they would cheer anything.

I think what stopped Val's push from happening were a number of reasons. 1) He began in the Austin/Rock/HHH era. Those three along with Undertaker were a part of every mainevent title fued from 98-01. 2) WCW's collapse. Big Show, Jericho, Benoit, Eddie, Booker T, Goldberg Nash Hogan Flair and Stiener for a while, all either signed before or after WCW's collapse and became maineventers from 99 to 04. Val was a multiple time IC champion, but never really was consistently dominant, never really going long stretches of dominance and always disappearing and re-appearing. His pushs were never the best, and the problem always seemed the WWE would always give up on them early, like his stint with T&A, RTC and his Chef Morley tenure. WIth a solid push like they gave Shelton or MVP, Val might've been able to become a dominant IC champ. I doubt he would've ever become WWE champion,especially with his gimmick, but if they changed it up sooner, like when he made his return in 2002, he may have progresses to mainevent.
Val isn't a touch on any of the wrestlers in this paragraph with the exception of perhaps MVP who is overrated. WWE dipped Vals toes in potentially big programmes with the Rock and Stone Cold but he didn't have anything like the star potential that they did. Being a multiple time IC champion in the attitude era is a big feat as the title meant alot more back then than it does today and many wrestling scholars argue that the mid-card made the attitude era. You could also argue that WWE gave up on his pushes early because well they wern't very good, (with the exception of RTC but Stevie Richards and Ivory made that work, Bull Buchanon, Godfather and Val were just additional faces.) He never would have progressed to the main-event though no matter what WWE wrote for him. Abit like how Kane will never be a world title holder other than that day reign despite having one of the most memorable gimmicks in history, neither him nor Val are good enough to have ever had a succesful run and there is no point being in the main-event if you're not going to be a world champion in my opinion.

His gimmick was becoming stale when the brought him back in 2002, they even tried re-naming him The Big Valbowski, so in 2003 they gave him a serious gimmick as Bishoff's assistant. This should've been the time to push him hard and over as a heel, not just in a power position, but to also to have him win a few matches, act kinda how Regal was briefly during his GM tenure, A man in power that is also a good wrestler. However, WWE did neither of these, making him look like Bishoff's pathetic wimpy assistant and looking almost as weak in the ring as Johnny Nitro did when he debuted as Bishoffs apprentice. Yes he was Tag Team champ with Lance Storm, but he awarded himself the title when Regal was injured, and I think they lost in either there first or second defence, but either way, putting a title on himself and then losing it quickly never looks good. After he got canned by Bishoff, he settled back into his old gimmick, formed a minorly successful tag team with Visera that got a title match, and has slowly transformed into this generations version of the Brooklyn Brawler with an occasional win, which isn't neccessarly a bad thing. He is a good wrestler, is willing to put anyone over and make them look good (which is always needed), and it is a steady job and a steady paycheck. Val may never get in the HOF, but he should because he's a class act, he's never made a big scene or had alot of backstage heat, and he's a solid talent, in the ring and out of the ring.
I wouldn't call him this generations Brooklyn Brawler, he merely does what JBL and Kane should be doing and using his name value for what it's worth by putting over the future talent, Val had his time to shine and things didn't work out but I think a succesful mid-carder is no shameful thing to be. He still acheived more in the buisness than people with a hell of a lot more talent than he has ever could. HOF is a step too far but as a class act he will at least survive in the memory of a select fanbase and that's quite a big achievment in it's own right. Every wrestler who ever laces up a pair of boots has a purpose and Val's was never to be a main-eventer but a credible mid-carder. I respect him for embracing that fact and not trying to become something he wasn't like Carlito would like to.
 
I dont know what else to say besides that basically Val just wasnt good enough to be anymore than a mid to solid mid carder. Yes he did get a reaction from the crowd back in the late 90s early 00s but everybody did. He wasnt nearly in the class of guys like HHH, Austin, Rock, Foley, Taker, Angle, Kane, Y2J or even the Big Show. All those guys were bigger draws and more over than Val was and ever was going to be no matter how hard he was pushed. And Im sure there some other people to that you can add to that list that Im forgetting about. So there simply was no room for him at or near the top, he was destined to be a mid carder at best.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,840
Messages
3,300,777
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top