The TNA product I would say is pretty solid at the moment. It isn't red hot, but it certainly isn't bad. Feel free to disagree. But I see the ratings that IMPACT gets and the buy rates that the PPV's draw and it baffles me how an average WWE PPV draws around 200,000 people (excluding the big 4) and an average TNA PPV draws around 10,000 people. Don't get me wrong I'm not bashing anyone here. My question to everyone is, what can TNA do to improve the amount of people drawn to there product? because to me, the only thing WWE has over TNA that is significantly better is there unbelievable production value. But when you look at the core part of every show and PPV, what is so different between them? TNA has a slightly higher focus on the Wrestling and WWE has a slighlty stronger focus on highlighting the feuds. When you look at video packages and things like that, WWE wins but only narrowly because some of the Before The Bell video packages TNA put together are very good. The only thing that downs me when I watch an average TNA show is the fact the set is so cheap. The only reason I can come up with as to why WWE is so much higher up in the world of Wrestling is because they put on a fantastic spectacle whereas when TNA tries with Bound For Glory, it still looks worse than an average RAW. Sorry I've been going on, I just want to know what you guys think TNA can do to draw more people in? They have star power. Good wrestling. Average storylines. But what do you think? (BTW this isn't a comparison thread between TNA and WWE)