Ways to spice up the WZ Tournament.

[Milkyway!]

I was just discussing with Lee about the WrestleZone tournament.

I have been watching, and participating in the WrestleZone tournament for 3 years now, and every year it's the exact same guys who make it into the final rounds.

I think it's time we find a way to "spice" things up, as with each passing year this is getting more and more redundant.

 

[Little Jerry Lawler]

I don't hear you suggesting anything.

 

[Remix]

throw the concept into the fire and be done with it.

 

[Milkyway!]

Actually I do have an idea.

Make it an invitational.

Put a password on the board, and then the staff selects names to invite into the tournament. You get a PM, you're invited.

 

[Remix]

Because THAT will ensure that the system is fair and representitive of the entire board's opinions.

 

[The Doctor]

I think we should run it using Mortal Kombat rules.

 

[Lee]

The whole point of the tourney is to bring new people to the forum.


Should go with smash bros rules.

 

[DirtyJosé]

The previous year's winner shouldn't be in the tourney. I think I've said that before.

 

[Milkyway!]

Who needs new people?

 

[#hamler]

Here we go, All Mid Carders...that way the "Who brings in more money" argument is thrown out the window.

 

[Remix]

at least it's less predictable than the tag tournament. After all, The Bulldogs have been in the final every year haven't they?

 

[Pepe Silvia]

You can't vote unless you make a bracket predicting the outcome, the person with the worst bracket gets sacrificed to Gozer

 

[Serious Jones]

every time someone breaks down someone's argument sentence by sentence with multi-quotes, drink once

every time someone uses the phrase "mic skills" drink twice

every time you find yourself even the slightest bit upset about someone's opinion on which wrestler is arbitrarily better, go outside and find some clitoris

 

[klunderbunker]

How about we keep doing the same thing over and over again because it keeps seeming to working and we actually want this to be interesting instead of about who is the 19th best wrestler of all time?

 

[Pepe Silvia]

every time you find yourself even the slightest bit upset about someone's opinion on which wrestler is arbitrarily better, go outside and find some clitoris

"Hey Chef."

 

[Richard]

The WZ tournament gets enough people coming back to post every year, if people don't want the same guys in the finals every year, just debate harder to get someone else over. It's fine how it is.

 

[Stormtrooper]

how about eliminating the gimmick matches. All they do is give chances to people who aren't good enough to beat other guys cleanly (ie Edge/Hogan, where the majority of the Edge posts said that Hogan would win any other match type). Not to mention how gimmick matches are unfair to the guys who competed in era's before the match types (like Thesz with any gimmick match, or Hogan with the TLC/Ladder Matches, etc).

If you can't beat the guy in a singles match (or a Steel Cage, which has been around forever), you don't deserve to advance. Simple as that.

 

[klunderbunker]

The gimmicks give you three forms of things to win: regular matches, gimmicks, tournament format.

 

[The Crock]

Stormtrooper, let the Hogan-Edge shit go. My God, your whining turned half the forum on Hogan.

 

[Big Nick Dudley]

how about eliminating the gimmick matches. All they do is give chances to people who aren't good enough to beat other guys cleanly (ie Edge/Hogan, where the majority of the Edge posts said that Hogan would win any other match type). Not to mention how gimmick matches are unfair to the guys who competed in era's before the match types (like Thesz with any gimmick match, or Hogan with the TLC/Ladder Matches, etc).

If you can't beat the guy in a singles match (or a Steel Cage, which has been around forever), you don't deserve to advance. Simple as that.

I don't think this would make the tournament more interesting. It would secure the same Top 4, each year, and that's about it.

 

[Pepe Silvia]

hogan ladurz

 

[justinsayne]

Yeah until the same guy is winning it year in year out, I really see no reason to change anything

 

[DirtyJosé]

how about eliminating the gimmick matches. All they do is give chances to people who aren't good enough to beat other guys cleanly (ie Edge/Hogan, where the majority of the Edge posts said that Hogan would win any other match type). Not to mention how gimmick matches are unfair to the guys who competed in era's before the match types (like Thesz with any gimmick match, or Hogan with the TLC/Ladder Matches, etc).

If you can't beat the guy in a singles match (or a Steel Cage, which has been around forever), you don't deserve to advance. Simple as that.

Last time I wanted to /facepalm this badly was when Deexter asked Vash about his wife.

 

[Serious Mozzarella]

If you can't beat the guy in a singles match (or a Steel Cage, which has been around forever), you don't deserve to advance. Simple as that.

Stormtrooper, Jesus Christ...

 

[Stormtrooper]

And again, having an opinion when said opinion is asked of me apparently has people angry at me.....

Jesus. I forgot that opinions are illegal here, if they differ from that of others.