Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yes, so bad that his Hall of Fame career stands those years as some of the most important things he's done. I can't see how bad he was going, but by all means point it out and I talked about him and Scott Steiner already, and that I grant it was stupid crap and trying to get a good match out of him(Steiner) is as harder as doing it with Otunga nowadays. Other than that, he was the perfect heel and a good face after he returned from that quad injury.
Oh and tell me how awful he was against Shawn Michaels please, by all means.
One great match doesn't save the rest of the feud.
Two great matches.One great match doesn't save the rest of the feud.
Business shrunk. It was two years spent going in the wrong direction. That's bad. That can't be disputed.It was two good years
Business shrunk. It was two years spent going in the wrong direction. That's bad. That can't be disputed.
I still enjoyed those two years. But the truth can't be denied.
How can you say that Evolution was shit? How can you say that Brock Lesnar vs. Kurt Angle was shit? How can you say that HHH's pretty much highlights are bad against the likes of Jericho, Michaels, Goldberg? Heck WrestleMania XIX has to be considered in the top5 best Mania's ever.
One thing, I bet I really do that you never watched anything in those years and you are just going into wikipedia to find some info. I grade a quality of a year for the impact it had to the future and the implication of it, you can't grade a year just because of three weeks of Katie Vick and Kane. Those two years are good, with the talent they have it's simply preposterous to even call it bad.
Here hate the guy all you want, your opinion means crap, I thought he was a great heel, what you gonna do? You're an idiot, try to back up the shit you spit.
The feud was good, what the hell are you saying? HHH vs. Jericho was quite good too. Oh and leaving HHH for a second, Michaels vs. Jericho at WM19 is still one of my favorite matches and rivalries, I mean I don't compare it with the rivalry they had some years later, but it was very good too.
And for the record, I'm not doing this for PWF or whatever, I also think he is a complete tool for having the ego that he has, but what's the difference between him and Coco? Coco also thinks he's one of the smartest guy on these forums because he does not like what the masses like, he's very exclusive you know.
Dolph Ziggler can't be a World Champion, not at all, but fucking RVD deserved a push in 2002-2003, when guys like Chris Benoit was getting there too, guys like Booker T were already higher than him, Shawn Michaels and Goldberg acted as top faces as well, so did Kane, so why in the blue hell should RVD been pushed to main event status? I can't even describe how awful it was if they pushed RVD.
It was the stage for rivalries in the midcard scene like Jericho vs. Goldberg, you know the story, Jericho didn't like him personally they even had a real fight backstage, so they solved their things in a good story also involving Lance Storm. It was two good years, everybody that posted no, or hell no are probably idiots that never even saw a thing from 2002-2003 but that's okay, that's okay. My point was more than made, and I'm sure that I am right so keep telling it sucked for the sake of it, and move on.
Here hate the guy all you want, your opinion means crap, I thought he was a great heel, what you gonna do? You're an idiot, try to back up the shit you spit.
The business as a whole was declining, you can't just create interest in a blink of an eye. I said that those two years were very important for the future of the WWE and I maintain that, but I also said that those two years were transitional phases. If HHH didn't had those two years being built as the man, Batista and Orton would have probably failed to make it so soon in their careers. I enjoyed those two years, obviously it wasn't the greatest years, but it had things that stood out, and I already mentioned all of them and their importance.
Stating that Katie Vick was atrocious, is right but it lasted not more than three weeks. However Hogan vs. The Rock was just tremendous, it was an iconic match and lasted more than a month in the making. The Undertaker vs. Ric Flair can be also runners for doing a great job, though I didn't enjoyed The Undertaker as much as I did when he got on track with Orton some years later, but nonetheless I don't believe not even by a slightly chance that 2002-2003 had a bad product, I consider 1993 with Lex Luger Express and Yokozuna a bad product, not HHH vs. Shawn Michaels or Angle vs. Lesnar.
1. When you refer to HHH vs. Jericho, I assume you mean the feud in which a dog (more important than Jericho) was involved?
2. RVD was still the most over face on Raw during the HHH reign of terror. Booker T died off at WM 19 when he should have won the title.
Can't you understand a simple fact that HHH was very over at that time. He was the best heel in terms of getting a loud reaction, ability to get heat, had a great heel persona and attitude. Booker-T came from WCW, Scott Steiner came from WCW why would Vince put a title on the guys who were some of the biggest names in the rival company (WCW)? And the fact that you hate HHH because of his 2003 heel run proves that he did his work good as a heel.
[YOUTUBE]Z_ehhpuO7Cw[/YOUTUBE]
And the fact that you hate HHH because of his 2003 heel run proves that he did his work good as a heel.
Can't you understand a simple fact that HHH was very over at that time. He was the best heel in terms of getting a loud reaction, ability to get heat, had a great heel persona and attitude. Booker-T came from WCW, Scott Steiner came from WCW why would Vince put a title on the guys who were some of the biggest names in the rival company (WCW)? And the fact that you hate HHH because of his 2003 heel run proves that he did his work good as a heel.
[YOUTUBE]Z_ehhpuO7Cw[/YOUTUBE]
It's not because he was doing good heel work, you moron, it's because he refused to make any young/rising superstar look good and only let himself and his buddies hog the spotlight.
I hate HHH because his 2003 heel run was shit. If he was actually good and I hated him, then he did good work. However, he sucked ass so he didn't.
Silly me, I would have thought any rational person would see that someone was getting over and having good matches week after week and at least give them a title run to see what happens. Booker T was just that guy and they failed to pull the trigger. Hell, Rock did in one night what HHH couldn't do for a whole damn year in 2003. Try to the find the Raw after No Way Out, watch it, and learn something from the Rock.
Month in the making? Come up with a phrase better than that. The match itself wasn't that great and that ambulance bit to build up the feud was just pathetically hilarious.
Seems like someone's chest is sticking out a bit too much. Trying to be bad on top of being just bad. I pity you.
1. When you refer to HHH vs. Jericho, I assume you mean the feud in which a dog (more important than Jericho) was involved?
2. RVD was still the most over face on Raw during the HHH reign of terror. Booker T died off at WM 19 when he should have won the title.
I hate HHH because his 2003 heel run was shit. If he was actually good and I hated him, then he did good work. However, he sucked ass so he didn't.
Silly me, I would have thought any rational person would see that someone was getting over and having good matches week after week and at least give them a title run to see what happens. Booker T was just that guy and they failed to pull the trigger. Hell, Rock did in one night what HHH couldn't do for a whole damn year in 2003. Try to the find the Raw after No Way Out, watch it, and learn something from the Rock.
1. Randy Orton got over because of heel HHH and Evolution.
2. Batista got over because of heel HHH and Evolution.
3. You are a biased HHH hater.
Rock was always cheered even as a heel.