War Games Set up

[XgringolocoX]

I have to admit that I was never a fan of the double ring set up for war games. This just ways looked too awkward to have a wrestling contest in. That, and I thought the cage was way too short. The wrestlers could hardly stand on the top rope.
So, that being said would you prefer to see this traditional War Games set up return should WWE bring back this gimmick? If so, is there any good reason other than tradition? If not, what set up do you think would work?

Personally, I think the Elimination Chamber is just about perfect. It give you a completely caged area that the wrestlers can't escape and it's large enough that multiple wreslters can perform in it unencombered. The pods allow you to enter wrestlers at intervals, just like the original. The only draw back is that it's set up for 6 competitors. 4 in pods, 2 in ring to start. However, if you start the match this way the 2 "captains" of each team could be on the outside making the decisions of who enters for thier team when necessary. The captains could then be allowed to enter though the door.
I first though of adding 2 pods, but that'll just take away from fighting area and screw with visuals.

So have at it.

 

[Ibi34DDT]

I remember reading a few times that Vince hates double rings with a passion. That may have even been a reason it took this long for War Games to return. I think when it comes back, it'll be something like a modified elimination chamber over one ring or a crazy steel cage we haven't seen before. Personally, I thought they should have brought it back last year for Bragging Rights.

 

[y2straightedge]

I liked the WarGames 2000 Triple Tier Cage because two rings looks akward and I would perfer WarGames 2000 because of WWE's Hell in a Cell which i think the tiers look like except they get smaller when you escape from one. I really like this match because of it being so brutal and I always wanted to see someone fall it like WWE's Hell in a Cell, awesome brutality.

 

[DexVendetta88]

I'm not a big fan of the double-ring setup either, but just remember that the purpose of the double-ring is for strategic purposes which works in favour for the team with the man-advantage during the first portion of the match. After that, the double-ring is virtually useless; it'll just be there for aesthetic purposes. Anyways, I can see the WWE scrapping the double-ring setup because 1. they want as much ringside seating as possible (more seats = more money), and 2. it would probably confuse the hell out of younger fans, and those who aren't familiar with the WarGames match as to why there has to be 2 rings for this match. For the cage, I see them using Hell in a Cell over the Elimination Chamber because Hell in a Cell is built to allow more than 6 participants to be inside it while the Elimination Chamber is specifically designed for only 6 participants, and it'll have a much tighter space than the Elimination Chamber which will make the match a little more challenging for both teams.

 

[XgringolocoX]

The Cell I think has more space inside actually. It doesn't have the pods. I think the main difference is that the hell doesn't have the steel platforms ouside the ring.
I felt the chamber would be better as opposed to the cell bacause you enter each wrestler at intervals. The pods in the chamber allow this. Difference from a normal chamber match is that it's not everyman for hisself.
I also feel that we don't need yet another "structure" match. The ones we have now can easily be used for War Games. This match shouuld be about the teams and the dynamic of 1 on 1, then 2 on 1, and so forth