I talked to D-Man about this thread a little bit, making sure it is all copacetic. I couldn't find any topics on this exactly, and if there is one, well the Mods know how to do their job better than I do, so there we are on that.
Anyway...
This is not a thread on how much PG sucks or how TNA is going after the demographic of 18-34 year old males.
This thread is about how Vince is doing the correct thing by not changing his programming or stories due to TNA. I want to make that clear right now.
Now for those saying "Oh my goodness, TNA is so good right now, Vince needs to start changing his philosophy, make it edgier and more entertaining" you are wrong. It is simple business, and what got me to thinking about this was radio. We were talking in class about competition among radio stations. Radio station X has been the top station amongst listeners for such and such amount of time, and when a new station comes along trying to take away some of their viewers, you don't acknowledge what they are doing. An example of this is station X has been doing what they do, let's say maybe 1/3 of the show is the DJs talking, and the other 2/3 is music and commercials, probably with more music than commercials. Then station Y comes along and says "I want to go after their target audience,how do we do it" so they do what they think will draw people from the other station, with maybe a commercial free Monday or something. Maybe less talk, cut that down to maybe 1/4 of the time, and use the other 75% of air time for music, and minimal commercials. Unless they lost a staggering amount of money, station X would stay the course while station Y is throwing everything they have got. My teacher, who has been in the radio business over 20 years, says that it is the right idea to stay the course unless something drastic has happened and you are losing a freakish amount of money.
This is a direct parallel, with radio in Chicago, to wrestling with WWE and TNA. Vince is staying the course, going about his business acting like TNA does not even exist. He does not need to go and please all of us and our wants for more entertaining and compelling action. Until TNA officially moves to Monday nights, and starts to pull away a substantial amount of viewers from Raw and the WWE, Vince is not pushing any gas pedals. Why should he? So people on here think TNA is a far superior product. Whoop dee fucking doo.
Matched up against Raw, if I recall correctly, they lost numbers in the hours they were going head to head. TNA was at a 1.7 when unopposed, but dropped to a 1.4 and a 1.2 head to head. Take away the first hour, and they get a 1.3, not a huge improvement from some of their previous ratings. Around the same time last year, they would get 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2 in successive weeks, and would get a 1.3 routinely in February and March of last year. I apologize for the tangent, I am going somewhere with it.
See, when TNA throws everything they had at Raw, my point facing towards the two hours of head to head, they lost viewers. Why does Vince need to be afraid right now and change how he puts out his product? He doesn't. He isn't losing viewers, he isn't losing a substantial amount of money, and lastly, he doesn't care what we say. We all wanted him to up his ante and possibly crush TNA on January 4th. Why didn't he do it, because it would be overall bad business to acknowledge another company by changing what he was doing. He did the same thing when WCW was around. He stayed his own course until WCW took the wrestling world by storm with the nWo. After that, and into '97 was when Vince would turn the engine a little bit, and then turned it on full blast. Why acknowledge something that isn't hurting you when you don't need to.
So I expect people to come in here and tell me I am wrong and that Vince needs to step up his game soon otherwise TNA will rise up. But remember, I don't mean 6 months or so down the line, I mean right now. Thoughts?
And please, this is a non-spam thread. So don't spam.
Anyway...
This is not a thread on how much PG sucks or how TNA is going after the demographic of 18-34 year old males.
This thread is about how Vince is doing the correct thing by not changing his programming or stories due to TNA. I want to make that clear right now.
Now for those saying "Oh my goodness, TNA is so good right now, Vince needs to start changing his philosophy, make it edgier and more entertaining" you are wrong. It is simple business, and what got me to thinking about this was radio. We were talking in class about competition among radio stations. Radio station X has been the top station amongst listeners for such and such amount of time, and when a new station comes along trying to take away some of their viewers, you don't acknowledge what they are doing. An example of this is station X has been doing what they do, let's say maybe 1/3 of the show is the DJs talking, and the other 2/3 is music and commercials, probably with more music than commercials. Then station Y comes along and says "I want to go after their target audience,how do we do it" so they do what they think will draw people from the other station, with maybe a commercial free Monday or something. Maybe less talk, cut that down to maybe 1/4 of the time, and use the other 75% of air time for music, and minimal commercials. Unless they lost a staggering amount of money, station X would stay the course while station Y is throwing everything they have got. My teacher, who has been in the radio business over 20 years, says that it is the right idea to stay the course unless something drastic has happened and you are losing a freakish amount of money.
This is a direct parallel, with radio in Chicago, to wrestling with WWE and TNA. Vince is staying the course, going about his business acting like TNA does not even exist. He does not need to go and please all of us and our wants for more entertaining and compelling action. Until TNA officially moves to Monday nights, and starts to pull away a substantial amount of viewers from Raw and the WWE, Vince is not pushing any gas pedals. Why should he? So people on here think TNA is a far superior product. Whoop dee fucking doo.
Matched up against Raw, if I recall correctly, they lost numbers in the hours they were going head to head. TNA was at a 1.7 when unopposed, but dropped to a 1.4 and a 1.2 head to head. Take away the first hour, and they get a 1.3, not a huge improvement from some of their previous ratings. Around the same time last year, they would get 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2 in successive weeks, and would get a 1.3 routinely in February and March of last year. I apologize for the tangent, I am going somewhere with it.
See, when TNA throws everything they had at Raw, my point facing towards the two hours of head to head, they lost viewers. Why does Vince need to be afraid right now and change how he puts out his product? He doesn't. He isn't losing viewers, he isn't losing a substantial amount of money, and lastly, he doesn't care what we say. We all wanted him to up his ante and possibly crush TNA on January 4th. Why didn't he do it, because it would be overall bad business to acknowledge another company by changing what he was doing. He did the same thing when WCW was around. He stayed his own course until WCW took the wrestling world by storm with the nWo. After that, and into '97 was when Vince would turn the engine a little bit, and then turned it on full blast. Why acknowledge something that isn't hurting you when you don't need to.
So I expect people to come in here and tell me I am wrong and that Vince needs to step up his game soon otherwise TNA will rise up. But remember, I don't mean 6 months or so down the line, I mean right now. Thoughts?
And please, this is a non-spam thread. So don't spam.