So during my daily browsing I found this.....
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/17/b...l?partner=rss&emc=rss&utm_source=feedly&_r=2&
Usually, when I do a theater thread, it's to complain about too much 3D, but the focus is shifting to a complaint of too many R-rated movies this time.
While I can understand, where John Fithian is coming from, I don't think R-rated movies are the problem. As the old saying goes, numbers don't lie. A few examples:
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=hangover2.htm
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=ted.htm
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=21jumpstreet.htm
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=djangounchained.htm
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=prometheus.htm
Well, yes, obviously Prometheus had some help from the foreign box office profits, because in the US, it just missed the mark for surpassing the production budget. But it's my belief Prometheus' vague and mysterious marketing campaign hurt the ticket sales for the US market. "Is it an Alien prequel?" This is the one question a lot of us asked, and we never got a clear answer, so Prometheus was going to be a tough sell no matter what.
In other places, I've seen some people use the recent Evil Dead film to support Fithian's comments. Evil Dead 2013 opened at #1, but it suffered a huge drop off the very next week. Evil Dead is only going to appeal to a niche audience. A lot of bloody violence, a woman vomiting blood and chunks of flesh onto someone else, and brutal mutilation throughout the movie. The die-hard horror fans, who enjoyed the originals, were going to find a way to watch this extreme bloodbath filled with carnage. Everyone else? Eh, not so much. But with all that said, Evil Dead 2013 still turned a respectable profit (http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=evildead2013.htm) for a low budget mainstream horror film.
R-rated movies aren't the problem. You have to factor in the convenience of various VOD services and RedBox (haven't seen any Blockbuster kiosks in a few years). Yeah, Iron Man 3, Man Of Steel, and The Hangover III will rack up the cash with big openings, and runs at the box office (I'm not 100% sure about Kick-Ass 2), but more people are taking the "eh, I'll just wait for it at home approach" now a days. Oh, and you can't forget about internet piracy, and numerous websites, where you can watch recent releases in high quality from your computer.
Then when you go to a theater, you always have to worry about some noisy assholes talking out loud, or using their cell phones. Said theater will go out of their way to run the "NO TEXTING OR USING YOUR PHONES DURING THE MOVIE!" ads before the movie, but some people don't give a damn. Why deal with all of this, when you can just stay home and watch the movie in a peaceful and quiet atmosphere?
Also, you can't forget about expensive ticket prices. So many theater chains are trying to compete with IMAX, so they add their own rip-off versions, which are a lot more expensive. And I alluded to it before, but 3D is still a problem, because again, some people aren't willing to shell out the extra cash.
So nasty r-rated movies aren't the major problem. Times are changing, and going to a theater can be a real hassle for a number of reasons. Take a look at Jack The Giant Slayer as a recent example. A family friendly movie, but it really tanked at the box office:
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=jackthegiantkiller.htm
The movie business has never been healthier, except that attendance in North America is down 12 percent so far this year compared to last. There was a plea for fewer R-rated movies, followed by chest-thumping from Universal Pictures about its crude comedy “Ted.”
And sitting in a darkened theater, attendees were told, has never been more enjoyable, unless you are attending CinemaCon, where you will be harshly advised to refrain from using your phone to illegally record movies. (Theater chain executives need to be reminded of this?)
Studios approach this convention, attended by about 5,000 people, as a crucial opportunity to get out their pom-poms and promote coming releases; if theater owners like what they see, it can help secure additional auditoriums during the gridlocked summer and holiday seasons. Studios enlist stars to help woo the theatrical troops — who fly in from spots like Kansas City and Knoxville — as Brad Pitt did on Monday night on behalf of his June release, “World War Z.”
For the National Association of Theater Owners, CinemaCon is an opportunity to discuss new audio technology, brainstorm about how to fight camcorder pirates and sample the latest and greatest in popped corn. This year, John Fithian, president and chief executive of that trade organization, also used the spotlight to complain about a glut of R-rated films.
He said attendance had suffered this year because of “the weight of too many R-rated movies.”
“Make more family-friendly films and fewer R-rated titles,” Mr. Fithian said. “Americans have stated their choice.”
Appearing with Christopher J. Dodd, chairman of the Motion Picture Association of America, Mr. Fithian also unveiled minor tweaks to the way ratings for individual films are advertised. The labels will include more prominent and legible descriptions of why a movie received a certain rating. Theaters will also begin running a ratings-related public service announcement.
Mr. Fithian’s criticism of R-rated movies comes after the school shootings last year in Newtown, Conn., and shootings last summer at a movie theater in Aurora, Colo.
After Mr. Fithian was Adam Fogelson, chairman of Universal Pictures. He began his presentation with an off-color scene from the R-rated “Ted” and then unveiled clips from two coming films that will be rated R. “2 Guns” is about undercover agents set up by the mob; “Kick-Ass 2” stars the young Chloë Grace Moritz as an (extremely) foul-mouthed crime fighter.
Mr. Fogelson also discussed lighter films planned for the summer, like a sequel to “Despicable Me” and the crime comedy “R.I.P.D.,” about undead police officers working for the Rest in Peace Department.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/17/b...l?partner=rss&emc=rss&utm_source=feedly&_r=2&
Usually, when I do a theater thread, it's to complain about too much 3D, but the focus is shifting to a complaint of too many R-rated movies this time.
While I can understand, where John Fithian is coming from, I don't think R-rated movies are the problem. As the old saying goes, numbers don't lie. A few examples:
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=hangover2.htm
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=ted.htm
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=21jumpstreet.htm
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=djangounchained.htm
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=prometheus.htm
Well, yes, obviously Prometheus had some help from the foreign box office profits, because in the US, it just missed the mark for surpassing the production budget. But it's my belief Prometheus' vague and mysterious marketing campaign hurt the ticket sales for the US market. "Is it an Alien prequel?" This is the one question a lot of us asked, and we never got a clear answer, so Prometheus was going to be a tough sell no matter what.
In other places, I've seen some people use the recent Evil Dead film to support Fithian's comments. Evil Dead 2013 opened at #1, but it suffered a huge drop off the very next week. Evil Dead is only going to appeal to a niche audience. A lot of bloody violence, a woman vomiting blood and chunks of flesh onto someone else, and brutal mutilation throughout the movie. The die-hard horror fans, who enjoyed the originals, were going to find a way to watch this extreme bloodbath filled with carnage. Everyone else? Eh, not so much. But with all that said, Evil Dead 2013 still turned a respectable profit (http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=evildead2013.htm) for a low budget mainstream horror film.
R-rated movies aren't the problem. You have to factor in the convenience of various VOD services and RedBox (haven't seen any Blockbuster kiosks in a few years). Yeah, Iron Man 3, Man Of Steel, and The Hangover III will rack up the cash with big openings, and runs at the box office (I'm not 100% sure about Kick-Ass 2), but more people are taking the "eh, I'll just wait for it at home approach" now a days. Oh, and you can't forget about internet piracy, and numerous websites, where you can watch recent releases in high quality from your computer.
Then when you go to a theater, you always have to worry about some noisy assholes talking out loud, or using their cell phones. Said theater will go out of their way to run the "NO TEXTING OR USING YOUR PHONES DURING THE MOVIE!" ads before the movie, but some people don't give a damn. Why deal with all of this, when you can just stay home and watch the movie in a peaceful and quiet atmosphere?
Also, you can't forget about expensive ticket prices. So many theater chains are trying to compete with IMAX, so they add their own rip-off versions, which are a lot more expensive. And I alluded to it before, but 3D is still a problem, because again, some people aren't willing to shell out the extra cash.
So nasty r-rated movies aren't the major problem. Times are changing, and going to a theater can be a real hassle for a number of reasons. Take a look at Jack The Giant Slayer as a recent example. A family friendly movie, but it really tanked at the box office:
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=jackthegiantkiller.htm