You guys do know that lashely was kicked out of wwe because of steroids
Do you have a source or just divine knowledge? MMA has a steroid policy "also", that is probably more legitimate because it's an actual sport, so Lashley would've tested positive there as well if he's still taking them.
"In a shocking move, Bobby Lashley has decided to walk away from the company that was pushing him as a future superstar."
http://www.wrestlingrevealed.com/news/080124.php
But hey, you're probably right because you said it so damn confidently.
Anyway, as someone mentioned earlier, the point of Lashley coming out was to make people watch next week, and that was the point of him coming out at the PPV. They did the same thing when Shawn Michaels returned after six years, they hit his music, he came out, pointed a finger, did his little dance moves, and came out the next week to talk. I wasn't nearly as excited to see Lashley back as I was more Michaels, and I'd probably watch Impact next week anyway, but it did it's job as many of you are displaying, so kudos to TNA.
Now for the people who write "I think" and then make stuff up or pull it out of the air. TNA has been consistantly having the same or better ratings than ECW. As a fan however, and if you know how the ratings system works, they're irrelevant and can't possibly have an effect on how you view a television show. ECW has the better actual wrestling in WWE, but the worst ratings. All ratings do is count how many people happened to land on that channel for a certain length of time before changing. They do this x amount of times. It tells nothing about the product itself, it's just a marketing tool.
I'm sorry to hear that the TNA PPVs you've seen, which is probably an over generalization of the ONE you may have seen clips of, were so bad. On another thread another idiot said that "they never have matches like Shawn Michales and the Undertaker had"...NEITHER DOES WWE. That was Wrestelmania, a truly global event. TNA doesn't have that (yet, hopefully). Also, they don't have Shawn Michaels or the Undertaker. Before that, and directly after that with HHH vs Orton, WWE has had sub-par matches as they only focus on the storytelling, not what's going on in the ring. TNA isn't WWE. WWE focuses on the storylines, TNA focuses on the different styles of actual wrestling. That isn't saying one is better or worse, they're just different, so stop throwing a fit in broken english. I was more excited for Lock Down than I was for Wrestlemania, and was more satisfied with the 30 dollars I spent on it than I was for the 50 I spent to watch Santino disgrace a potentially good idea, as 23 second match to add to the disgrace of a once coveted title, to not see a promised title match of a now disgraced but once coveted title, and finally to watch Chris Jericho attempt to make old vets look good. Wrestlemania had its moments, as they all do and should, but overall that wasn't the PPV of the year, as it should be.
