Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You're so desperate for attention that you HAVE a Twitter account.
Case closed.
So... that Kate Upton, hot as fuck. Right?
Still want to tittyfuck this thread?Yes, I'm desperate. Along with 200 million other people.
I guess we live in a desperate world.
Still want to tittyfuck this thread?
Amusing, seeing as the only thing that's changed about this thread visually is that Swagger's face in your sig is now plastered all over it.Yes. Every hot thread needs some drama to make it hotter.
The difference now is I want to give the thread a facial when I'm through.
Yes it is debatable. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder in all cases, and what is beautiful to you won't be to another. It doesn't take away from your enjoyment, so why care if others don't care for her face?That may hold true in some cases, but a beautiful girl is a beautiful girl. She may not be your cup of tea, but to deny that she is an astonishingly beautiful woman is just plain wrong. You don't have to think she's perfect, and you can think there are better looking girls out there, but she's beautiful. That's not debatable.
With your hand dude...With your hand.Барбоса;4345397 said:You could cut the sex tension in here with a knife.
And that is before we add Kate Upton into the mix.
Now that I read it back, I agree.
It isn't even subtext at this point. I'm talking with D-Man about facials and tittyfucking.
I need a shower.
Yes it is debatable. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder in all cases, and what is beautiful to you won't be to another. It doesn't take away from your enjoyment, so why care if others don't care for her face?
Blow up? I'd never heard of her until this thread was posted.You don't blow up the way Kate Upton has without being beautiful.
Blow up? I'd never heard of her until this thread was posted.
"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder in all cases". I'm not sure I can do much more than repeat this. There isn't such a thing as undeniable beauty, there are only looks that appease the greatest proportion of a population. If it was undeniable, everyone who didn't find her attractive would be wrong for having an unalterable perception. You don't choose what you like, therefore what you like can't be wrong.
You don't blow up the way Kate Upton has without being beautiful. Just because you aren't attracted to her doesn't take away from the fact that she is a damn attractive woman. Gisele Bundchen isn't my type of girl, but I won't deny that she is fucking gorgeous because that would be wrong. You don't become a supermodel without being damn good looking.
Барбоса;4346205 said:Wait, Sports Illustrated is actually about sport?
I thought it had degenerated into a glorified softcore porn mag.
What if what you "like" is children? Or doesnt have a pulse? Or a combination of the two?
That's a "we're both piss drunk at three in the morning" discussion.I know it's a very difficult thing to prove, but I suspect that you couldn't like children or dead people (in that way) unless there had been some sort of psychological incident(s) prompting it. I don't know if anybody is born destined a paedophile or necrophiliac in other words.
That's a "we're both piss drunk at three in the morning" discussion.