simpsons_fanatic742
WZPC Intercontinental Champion
My question in this thread is simple, what is harder for a wrestler to be, a face or a heel?
In my opinion, I believe it is easier to be a heel. I think this because it is easier to make people hate you and boo you than it is to have people like you and cheer for you. Also, there's a lot of factors for a face to get over. If the wrestler is bad on the mic, the crowd won't care and won't cheer, if they stink in the ring, again they will be booed. But, in the situation of a heel, if they suck they'll get booed, which in the end is exactly what they want.
A face has to be able to connect to the crowd. Even in real life, it's hard to make everyone like you, but one move and you can get a hell of a lot of people to hate you. I just feel, in my eyes, that for a wrestler it is easier to portray a heel than it is a face.
What are your thoughts?
In my opinion, I believe it is easier to be a heel. I think this because it is easier to make people hate you and boo you than it is to have people like you and cheer for you. Also, there's a lot of factors for a face to get over. If the wrestler is bad on the mic, the crowd won't care and won't cheer, if they stink in the ring, again they will be booed. But, in the situation of a heel, if they suck they'll get booed, which in the end is exactly what they want.
A face has to be able to connect to the crowd. Even in real life, it's hard to make everyone like you, but one move and you can get a hell of a lot of people to hate you. I just feel, in my eyes, that for a wrestler it is easier to portray a heel than it is a face.
What are your thoughts?