Calderownz
Brilliant Idiot
OKay. This one should get some pretty interesting answers. So, I think we'll give it a try.
THE GOOD:
Some of the most legendary promo work in the history of this business. To me, he's one of the best, clearly. Nonetheless, he has was also able to pull out some very classic matches. I also love the fact that for a man that never looked ripped to shreds, he was able to have 60+ minute matches week in and week out with some of the biggest names this business has seen. Steamboat, Race, McDaniel, Piper. The list could go on and on. If you mattered in this business in the last 30 to 40 years, chances are you faced Flair. Great work ethic.
THE BAD:
Well, the first thing that pops into my mind is the fact that he had a few set moves that you were guaranteed to see in every match. I realize that every wrestler had this and that if you do it well, why change it. Nonetheless, towards the end of his career and even before that point, it almost became a parody of wrestling moves. Enjoyable, but not genuinely technical, so to speak. He also seemed to work best with other great workers. He could always get out a decent match, but it COULD be hit or miss.
THE UGLY:
Well, he did have some backstage politicking. Most of the top guys usually do, but he could really work his angles. He also wasn't the best of bookers, and I think even he would tell you that he wasn't. Also, his partying was legendary, but also got he and the Horsemen into some heat at times. Finally, I think his verbal wars with any other wrestler he didn't consider a friend was a bit pathetic. You'd assume he was sure of his spot by then, yet he still felt the need to rip into guys that at times asked for it (Bret Hart) and other guys who were innocent of those types of things (Mick Foley.)
What about you guys?
THE GOOD:
Some of the most legendary promo work in the history of this business. To me, he's one of the best, clearly. Nonetheless, he has was also able to pull out some very classic matches. I also love the fact that for a man that never looked ripped to shreds, he was able to have 60+ minute matches week in and week out with some of the biggest names this business has seen. Steamboat, Race, McDaniel, Piper. The list could go on and on. If you mattered in this business in the last 30 to 40 years, chances are you faced Flair. Great work ethic.
THE BAD:
Well, the first thing that pops into my mind is the fact that he had a few set moves that you were guaranteed to see in every match. I realize that every wrestler had this and that if you do it well, why change it. Nonetheless, towards the end of his career and even before that point, it almost became a parody of wrestling moves. Enjoyable, but not genuinely technical, so to speak. He also seemed to work best with other great workers. He could always get out a decent match, but it COULD be hit or miss.
THE UGLY:
Well, he did have some backstage politicking. Most of the top guys usually do, but he could really work his angles. He also wasn't the best of bookers, and I think even he would tell you that he wasn't. Also, his partying was legendary, but also got he and the Horsemen into some heat at times. Finally, I think his verbal wars with any other wrestler he didn't consider a friend was a bit pathetic. You'd assume he was sure of his spot by then, yet he still felt the need to rip into guys that at times asked for it (Bret Hart) and other guys who were innocent of those types of things (Mick Foley.)
What about you guys?