Last night's episode of Monday Night Raw highlighted a fundamental flaw in the WWE's current booking strategy - an overt tendency to rush storytelling. Let's just walk through this.
Rey Mysterio wins the title in the opening match. This is all well and good - it was the continuation of the storyline from last week. In fact, I applaud their decision to stretch the tournament out to two weeks. It built suspense (this is a key idea). Mysterio heads to the back, everyone celebrates, then he runs into Cena. Again, through this, everything is just great. Then, the madness begins. Announcing John Cena vs Rey Mysterio for the main event...of that night's Raw? I continually assumed the match would be rapidly interfered in, or something would happen to end it unsatisfactorily, leading up to a rematch. But, no. Instead, John Cena won the match, CM Punk returned, and now they are moving to a rematch at SummerSlam between Punk and Cena.
The entire storyline moved at a breakneck pace, without any room for suspense, development, or intrigue. CM Punk returned all of eight days after leaving the company dramatically, supposedly never to be seen again. Why was there even a need for a tournament? Ostensibly, Triple H re-signed Punk sometime during the course of the week. He would have known that the WWE Champion was returning, and should have cancelled the tournament in progress. There is absolutely no logic to it. We barely even got to miss CM Punk, or see his storyline build up outside the WWE. An appearance at Comic-Con and an AAW show are great foundation work, but it should have been more.
Furthermore, Cena and Mysterio in and of itself was horrifically rushed. It was one of the WWE's last dream matches to put together using stars they still have under contract. And what do they do, exactly? Blow it on free TV, unadvertised. It won't even spike the ratings. CM Punk's return will no doubt increase ratings the next week, to be sure, but it is almost certain that if they held off on his return longer, it would have done more. Punk could have spent his time off making appearances on radio, doing interviews, showing up at indy shows with the belt - building this entire storyline to an epic return. Instead? He makes two appearances and comes back a week later.
Mysterio/Cena could have been at least a month long program. It would have been an incredible main event to SummerSlam. Let's just imagine that happened, shall we? Mysterio and Cena have a feud of respect over the next month. SummerSlam comes around. The two get to have more time than they had on TV to put together a great match, and in the end, suppose Cena wins. At the end of the show, as Cena celebrates, Punk returns in the same way he just did last night. Let's look at the effects this would have had, as opposed to the way it played out in reality.
1) The WWE gets a month of good television, using two of their biggest draws as a focal point
2) The WWE build a huge SummerSlam main event that will increase buys
3) The WWE better develops the CM Punk saga, making his return a bigger deal, which in turn spikes Raw ratings the next night (presumably, anyway)
Are there any cons to stretching this storyline out another month? Not that I can see, unless you hate money.
The bigger problem is that this is not an isolated incident. It happens all the time with WWE storytelling. On SmackDown, Christian's title run was jilted after two nights to start a program with Orton where he turned heel. The program has actually been good - the problem is, it could have been stretched out. Suppose that, after the draft, Orton instead feuded with Cody Rhodes, or Wade Barrett, or whomever. Let Christian work a program with Sheamus, moving into a Triple Threat, and then on a PPV, drop the title one on one to Orton. Conceivably, this could have given the WWE three PPV main events for SmackDown in a row - Christian vs Sheamus, Christian vs Sheamus vs Orton, and Christian vs Orton. Instead, they did it in two days. Three months of TV and PPV, versus two days. Do you see the problem there?
This happened last year, too, with the Nexus. The Nexus was well booked through Hell in a Cell, where Cena was forced to join the Nexus. The ensuing storyline was an abomination of rushed booking and, though this is a different subject, an inability to make Cena look weak for a second. Cena was never, not even for a moment, subjugated by the Nexus. He rebelled constantly, when there should have been at least a few weeks of him struggling with their control. Then, he gets fired for refusing to obey Barrett's orders. Not a bad development...except that he never even left programming. For the entire duration of his "firing" he was on TV. Every week. They couldn't even take him off of house shows. Would it have been so much to ask for Cena to leave programming for a month, making his return at TLC to confront Barrett, and concluding their saga at the Royal Rumble? This would still have allotted time for Punk to take over the Nexus and play out the entirety of that storyline.
I can't fathom the WWE does this, time after time. They blow off months of television for quick developments that don't build any suspense or properly build storylines. If they just took some time, they would have bigger PPV matches, more compelling television, and more money. They lose, using this strategy. And so do we, as fans, because we are robbed are that same compelling television and storylines. Nobody profits from this type of booking, so why do it?
You tell me - what am I missing? Is this actually an effective strategy for the WWE? Do you feel the storylines are rushed as well, or are they cutting out boring bits, to the benefit of all? Would the hypotheticals discussed above made for good TV and PPV, or do you prefer the way the real thing played out?
Rey Mysterio wins the title in the opening match. This is all well and good - it was the continuation of the storyline from last week. In fact, I applaud their decision to stretch the tournament out to two weeks. It built suspense (this is a key idea). Mysterio heads to the back, everyone celebrates, then he runs into Cena. Again, through this, everything is just great. Then, the madness begins. Announcing John Cena vs Rey Mysterio for the main event...of that night's Raw? I continually assumed the match would be rapidly interfered in, or something would happen to end it unsatisfactorily, leading up to a rematch. But, no. Instead, John Cena won the match, CM Punk returned, and now they are moving to a rematch at SummerSlam between Punk and Cena.
The entire storyline moved at a breakneck pace, without any room for suspense, development, or intrigue. CM Punk returned all of eight days after leaving the company dramatically, supposedly never to be seen again. Why was there even a need for a tournament? Ostensibly, Triple H re-signed Punk sometime during the course of the week. He would have known that the WWE Champion was returning, and should have cancelled the tournament in progress. There is absolutely no logic to it. We barely even got to miss CM Punk, or see his storyline build up outside the WWE. An appearance at Comic-Con and an AAW show are great foundation work, but it should have been more.
Furthermore, Cena and Mysterio in and of itself was horrifically rushed. It was one of the WWE's last dream matches to put together using stars they still have under contract. And what do they do, exactly? Blow it on free TV, unadvertised. It won't even spike the ratings. CM Punk's return will no doubt increase ratings the next week, to be sure, but it is almost certain that if they held off on his return longer, it would have done more. Punk could have spent his time off making appearances on radio, doing interviews, showing up at indy shows with the belt - building this entire storyline to an epic return. Instead? He makes two appearances and comes back a week later.
Mysterio/Cena could have been at least a month long program. It would have been an incredible main event to SummerSlam. Let's just imagine that happened, shall we? Mysterio and Cena have a feud of respect over the next month. SummerSlam comes around. The two get to have more time than they had on TV to put together a great match, and in the end, suppose Cena wins. At the end of the show, as Cena celebrates, Punk returns in the same way he just did last night. Let's look at the effects this would have had, as opposed to the way it played out in reality.
1) The WWE gets a month of good television, using two of their biggest draws as a focal point
2) The WWE build a huge SummerSlam main event that will increase buys
3) The WWE better develops the CM Punk saga, making his return a bigger deal, which in turn spikes Raw ratings the next night (presumably, anyway)
Are there any cons to stretching this storyline out another month? Not that I can see, unless you hate money.
The bigger problem is that this is not an isolated incident. It happens all the time with WWE storytelling. On SmackDown, Christian's title run was jilted after two nights to start a program with Orton where he turned heel. The program has actually been good - the problem is, it could have been stretched out. Suppose that, after the draft, Orton instead feuded with Cody Rhodes, or Wade Barrett, or whomever. Let Christian work a program with Sheamus, moving into a Triple Threat, and then on a PPV, drop the title one on one to Orton. Conceivably, this could have given the WWE three PPV main events for SmackDown in a row - Christian vs Sheamus, Christian vs Sheamus vs Orton, and Christian vs Orton. Instead, they did it in two days. Three months of TV and PPV, versus two days. Do you see the problem there?
This happened last year, too, with the Nexus. The Nexus was well booked through Hell in a Cell, where Cena was forced to join the Nexus. The ensuing storyline was an abomination of rushed booking and, though this is a different subject, an inability to make Cena look weak for a second. Cena was never, not even for a moment, subjugated by the Nexus. He rebelled constantly, when there should have been at least a few weeks of him struggling with their control. Then, he gets fired for refusing to obey Barrett's orders. Not a bad development...except that he never even left programming. For the entire duration of his "firing" he was on TV. Every week. They couldn't even take him off of house shows. Would it have been so much to ask for Cena to leave programming for a month, making his return at TLC to confront Barrett, and concluding their saga at the Royal Rumble? This would still have allotted time for Punk to take over the Nexus and play out the entirety of that storyline.
I can't fathom the WWE does this, time after time. They blow off months of television for quick developments that don't build any suspense or properly build storylines. If they just took some time, they would have bigger PPV matches, more compelling television, and more money. They lose, using this strategy. And so do we, as fans, because we are robbed are that same compelling television and storylines. Nobody profits from this type of booking, so why do it?
You tell me - what am I missing? Is this actually an effective strategy for the WWE? Do you feel the storylines are rushed as well, or are they cutting out boring bits, to the benefit of all? Would the hypotheticals discussed above made for good TV and PPV, or do you prefer the way the real thing played out?