In the Pokemon series you always begin your collection with one of that generation's "starter pokemon". These starters would include representatives from three different types. Grass, Fire, and Water. The only exception was in the Yellow version where you start with Pikachu and could catch each of the Red/Blue starters on the way through events in the game. Every other version has started players off with the same type sets.
GRASS STARTERS
Bulbasaur - Red/Blue
Chikorita - Gold/Silver/Crystal
Treecko - Ruby/Sapphire/Emerald
Turtwig - Diamond/Pearl/Platinum
Snivy - Black/White
WATER STARTERS
Squirtle - Red/Blue
Totodile - Gold/Silver/Crystal
Mudkip - Ruby/Sapphire/Emerald
Piplup - Diamond/Pearl/Platinum
Oshawott - Black/White
FIRE STARTERS
Charmander - Red/Blue
Cyndaquil - Gold/Silver/Crystal
Torchic - Ruby/Sapphire/Emerald
Chimchar - Diamond/Pearl/Platinum
Tepig - Black/White
So with the background out of the way.... My questions are these:
Should more games have deviated from the 3 main starter types like Yellow did, why or why not? If yes, what are some species you would like to have had as potential starters? (disregarding legends or evolutions)
I personally would have liked to see more deviation from always doing Grass/Water/Fire as starters. There are 17 types and 13 of them have never had a starter before, while Electric has only been represented by Pikachu in one version. It comes off as lazy when it continues to be the same three starter types in every single version in my opinion, and it's a small part of the reason why my interest in the series dropped. Part of the reason may have been due to not being able to come up with a Rock/Paper/Scissors format of the starters being effective against each other. Given the diverse types and effective rates, it's possible to come up with a new starter trio that would work. Fighting/Psychic/Dark, for example could work. Or maybe the developers just subscribe to the "it it ain't broke, don't fix it" philosophy, which is fine, but eventually all ideas lose their appeal if done too much without some type of change.
Discuss!
GRASS STARTERS
Bulbasaur - Red/Blue
Chikorita - Gold/Silver/Crystal
Treecko - Ruby/Sapphire/Emerald
Turtwig - Diamond/Pearl/Platinum
Snivy - Black/White
WATER STARTERS
Squirtle - Red/Blue
Totodile - Gold/Silver/Crystal
Mudkip - Ruby/Sapphire/Emerald
Piplup - Diamond/Pearl/Platinum
Oshawott - Black/White
FIRE STARTERS
Charmander - Red/Blue
Cyndaquil - Gold/Silver/Crystal
Torchic - Ruby/Sapphire/Emerald
Chimchar - Diamond/Pearl/Platinum
Tepig - Black/White
So with the background out of the way.... My questions are these:
Should more games have deviated from the 3 main starter types like Yellow did, why or why not? If yes, what are some species you would like to have had as potential starters? (disregarding legends or evolutions)
I personally would have liked to see more deviation from always doing Grass/Water/Fire as starters. There are 17 types and 13 of them have never had a starter before, while Electric has only been represented by Pikachu in one version. It comes off as lazy when it continues to be the same three starter types in every single version in my opinion, and it's a small part of the reason why my interest in the series dropped. Part of the reason may have been due to not being able to come up with a Rock/Paper/Scissors format of the starters being effective against each other. Given the diverse types and effective rates, it's possible to come up with a new starter trio that would work. Fighting/Psychic/Dark, for example could work. Or maybe the developers just subscribe to the "it it ain't broke, don't fix it" philosophy, which is fine, but eventually all ideas lose their appeal if done too much without some type of change.
Discuss!