So what now for Daniel Bryan????

[Kizzani]

If you have ever seen my post you already know how I feel about wrestling and the writing that goes into it. But for those who don't know, I'll briefly touch on it.
Almost everyone knows wrestling is scripted and other than the actually pain it is more or less fake. Fake is a horrible word though since we can obviously see that shit hurts. But even though we know many of the outcomes and that it is scripted why do we still watch? for me it is simple believability, as an example outside of wrestling Die hard. Good actors, with a seriously hard to believe storyline but when you add them together you think well maybe....As they have gone on longer now they are bad. adding other actors that have no reason to be there a long with extremely exaggerated events.
Now I bring it back to the WWE and ask you what next for Daniel Bryan? Who would you believe could legitly beat him for the championship?

My Answer is NO ONE currently on the roster. In 1 night Daniel Bryan beat 3 of the very top Superstars in the WWE, and since WWE refuses to have a face vs Face legit match your left with the WEAKest class of heels ever in the WWE.
It looks to me as if Daniel Bryan is going to face Kane at extreme rules which is the dumbest shit ever. Kane just got squashed by the Shield in record time at Mania. Kane is weak and old and WWE is just trying to find him a spot before they shuffle him backstage. Just like John Cena and his runs, Bryan really has zero believeable Competition. What all of the sudden his desire to win is gone and now he is going to step back? No.

So who would you like to see beat him. Or should he hold it until the reality era ends and then we can go back to believable wrestling?

 

[JoeMallard]

When in the hell was professional wrestling ever believable? By you judgement, big guys should only fight big guys and that just gets flat out boring!

Do you really think Bryan is going to have an easy title reign? No, because over the next few months he will be defending the title again the likes of HHH, Batista, Orton and sadly probably Kane. However, I believe his biggest challenge will be Brock Lesner, which I could see taking the titles.

 

[TheOneAndOnlyGOAT]

Was Shawn Michaels beating Vader believable? Was Rey Mysterio beating Big Show believable? Was Eddie Guerrero beating Brock Lesnar believable? Was CM Punk beating Mark Henry believable?

Stop with the believable cr@p.


I feel like this thread was only done to annoy Bryan fans.

 

[pepentorresHHH]

If you have ever seen my post you already know how I feel about wrestling and the writing that goes into it. But for those who don't know, I'll briefly touch on it.
Almost everyone knows wrestling is scripted and other than the actually pain it is more or less fake. Fake is a horrible word though since we can obviously see that shit hurts. But even though we know many of the outcomes and that it is scripted why do we still watch? for me it is simple believability, as an example outside of wrestling Die hard. Good actors, with a seriously hard to believe storyline but when you add them together you think well maybe....As they have gone on longer now they are bad. adding other actors that have no reason to be there a long with extremely exaggerated events.
Now I bring it back to the WWE and ask you what next for Daniel Bryan? Who would you believe could legitly beat him for the championship?

My Answer is NO ONE currently on the roster. In 1 night Daniel Bryan beat 3 of the very top Superstars in the WWE, and since WWE refuses to have a face vs Face legit match your left with the WEAKest class of heels ever in the WWE.
It looks to me as if Daniel Bryan is going to face Kane at extreme rules which is the dumbest shit ever. Kane just got squashed by the Shield in record time at Mania. Kane is weak and old and WWE is just trying to find him a spot before they shuffle him backstage. Just like John Cena and his runs, Bryan really has zero believeable Competition. What all of the sudden his desire to win is gone and now he is going to step back? No.

So who would you like to see beat him. Or should he hold it until the reality era ends and then we can go back to believable wrestling?

Way too pessimistic about Bryan's reign which is just 7 days old.....

Why are you asking who is gonna take the title from his this early? How about he gets through HHH or Batista or Orton first or even Kane first. Answering your question i think he will defend his belt again Brock at summerslam and actually wins there but then whoever is MITB cashes in and takes the belt.

First of all Bryan is NOT facing Kane at Extreme Rules. Why would he? There's only 2 men who bryan could face there, and thats HHH or Orton ( you know the guy with the rematch clause). if Kane is going to challenge for the belt it will be on a Raw not on PPV. Tbh i think HHH or Orton challenge at ER and Payback, Batista at MITB, Brock at SS. kane is still very much involved with the shield to even focus on Bryan.

Aa far as weak heels...... Im sure theres Bray who beat the champion clean on PPV 2 events ago so he could give Bryan a good 1 or 2 ppv program next.... In the meantime Cesaro will grow with Heyman to the point where he could provide a good challenge (maybe during the fall?).
Cena and Bryan could have their rematch by next year's mania for all we know.....
Lets see where his title reign goes before talking about ending it already....

 

[Kizzani]

Was Shawn Michaels beating Vader believable? Was Rey Mysterio beating Big Show believable? Was Eddie Guerrero beating Brock Lesnar believable? Was CM Punk beating Mark Henry believable?

Shawn made it believable, That is what made him so great.
Rey and Big show absolutely not and you can tell as their careers have continued they have gone no where.
Eddie Guerrero beating Lesnar was very believable because lesnar can sell with the best of them and Eddie was a bad ass.
CM Punk beating Henry was also believable once again CM punk is in that upper echelon class.

But again none of these guys, fought matches like what Bryan did. CM Punk didn't beat John Cena and then go into a triple threat vs Del Rio and Sheamus. HBK didn't beat Vader then go on to beat Bret hart and Kevin Nash in a triple Threat.

I feel like this thread was only done to annoy Bryan fans.

Some of it was, I like poking at the sheeple. (no that way I am not from texas)

When in the hell was professional wrestling ever believable? By you judgement, big guys should only fight big guys and that just gets flat out boring!

So you think pro wrestling is just entertaining? Absolutely nothing is believable damn I couldn't watch that.

By my Judgement; 1st question how do you know what my judgment is? Or did you just go full TNA and shove your head up your ass to make comments?

I don't think big guy should only fight big guys. I LOVED seeing Cesaro take down big show. Here is proof big guys v Big isn't always great, Last time big show was that vertical Kevin Nash dropped him on his head.
I am a huge HBK fan and he in no means was a "big guy". But when HBK, Hart, Stone cold came on to the stage ( none really big guys) they made beating big guys look believable.
They pull that last ditch effort to lay a final big blow and crawl over for the cover. Bryan doesn't have that, he goes from being dead and beat to flying around the ring like he is the fresh man.

Do you really think Bryan is going to have an easy title reign? No, because over the next few months he will be defending the title again the likes of HHH, Batista, Orton and sadly probably Kane. However, I believe his biggest challenge will be Brock Lesner, which I could see taking the titles.

HHH he already beat clean and can easily do it again, he beat Batistas and Orton together, separately it is even easier and Kane...OH kane who was decimated by the shield in record mania time. So that joke is over. Then you have Brock Lesnar, the I beat taker and disappeared. Sure some day he will come back but we have already seen CM Punk can handle him, HHH handled him so why would Bryan be any different.
But that is my point Lesnar is really the last remaining challenge.

As far as weak heels...... Im sure theres Bray who beat the champion clean on PPV 2 events ago so he could give Bryan a good 1 or 2 ppv program next.... In the meantime Cesaro will grow with Heyman to the point where he could provide a good challenge (maybe during the fall?).
Cena and Bryan could have their rematch by next year's mania for all we know.....
Lets see where his title reign goes before talking about ending it already....

I am glad you're seeing my point. Yes Bray Wyatt is the obvious choice, but if Bray is stumbling on Cena trying to get him to turn heel, then he is locked into a program with Cena leaving him out of the picture.
Orton has a rematch they are delaying because Bryan has beat Orton on multiple occasions and his WM shows he can beat Triple HHH 1 on 1 with 1 arm and then go on to beat triple H ( at ringside) Orton and Batista with even less of 1 arm.
Cesaro is legit, but they are not going to push him to the title that fast so yes "IN TIME" he will get there. But he is not Championship HEEL ready right now.
But the WWE has Heels, Del Rio, Orton, Titus, kane....But none are worth the time for a title match let alone a title match Main Event. WWE has spent to much time burying their heels.

So the list is Bray and Lesnar. Tell me that list is not weak when you have a roster of over 60 superstars.

 

[Franchize1990]

What's next for Daniel Bryan over the next few months is to continue to prove that the Miracle on Bourbon Street was no fluke. At WrestleMania, the WWE had Bryan beat Triple H in a 1 on 1 match to establish that he was a for real contender for the WWE World Heavyweight Championship. The beauty of them booking the triple threat match as the main event is that it is believable for the best of the three to walk out of that match a loser, all one has to do is capitalize at the most opportune moment to become the winner. I believe that Bryan has only beaten Orton in a singles match "legit" one time storyline wise in the last 8 months so he's still a believable contender. You could say Batista had the match one but got caught off guard from Bryan so, he's still a legit person for the main event scene. As said before, the man who ended the streak isn't doing anything at the moment and once the program with Cena is over with, you can toss Bray Wyatt into that mix if you want to as well. Now while the quantity of the heels seems to be pretty thin, it's still decent in terms of quality as for right now for the next couple of months.

 

[CrucifiedRaven]

I think he can still have a believable re-match with Triple H. Hunter basically says how Bryan's win was a fluke and there's no way he can do it again. Plus the way he knocked him out with a sledgehammer at 'Mania could have foreshadowed that they'll make it some stipulation like Last Man Standing, No Holds Barred or even a Cage Match.

After Triple H though, I agree there's not a lot of competition. Randy Orton and his rematch clause, plus the fact that he wasn't pinned or didn't submit at 'Mania makes sense for him to be next in line at Payback. But Bryan has beaten Orton every time they've fought and it would almost just be a formality. Batista has a claim as well, because Bryan basically "stole his opportunity" at 'Mania as it should have just been a one-on-one match. But same thing, Bryan has beaten Batista on RAW and he made him submit at 'Mania. So there are enough contenders for Bryan to go through but none of them are really a believable threat. Kane shouldn't even be considered unless it's a Smackdown main event.

Bray Wyatt is an interesting option though. We've already seen the storyline unfortunately, but he beat Bryan at the Rumble and could make a claim that he'll do it again. I just don't think we want to re-hash the same storyline and feud as just a few months ago.

Then they go with one of Reigns or Cesaro but I think it is too early for both of them, especially since it'd be a face vs face matchup.

I think Bryan will go through the Authority, just how Benoit (to keep that comparison going) kept feuding with Evolution and Triple H. Then SummerSlam will come and they could throw Lesnar into the mix, now that'd be interesting.

 

[George Steele's Barber]

DB as much as Orton as champ is ripe to lose. Just because he's won some matches lately only means so much. He has the whole power of the WWE out to get him. He has the rep of being a guy who works best chasing. WWE has had some lengthy title runs lately, a little hotshotting wouldn't be the end of the world. There's HHH, Orton, Wyatt, Batista, Lesnar, Cena that could face and beat him. Aren't we suppose to believe that Batista is supposed to he champ when his movie comes out? Didn't Wyatt beat DB on a big stage a couple months ago? Isn't DB one of those guys HHH is inevitably going to bury? Can Cena go this long without a title run? Is Lesnar really supposed to follow up ending the streak with losing to DB?

It's very simple. You just seem to be bitching for bitches' sake.