Should TNA Take the Youth Movement Idea from WWE?

[themizisawesomemikeali]

WWE has never had youth movement until now!undertaker is the best example!he has been the top guy since the last ten years

 

[He's Phenomenal]

I’m not sure where this WWE youth movement myth comes from in all honesty. I remember hearing about this last year, and being very bored (and sad) I decided to combine the ages of the wrestlers in the main feuds heading into TNA’s Final Resolution PPV and WWE’s December PPV (not sure what it was called). And guess what? The combined ages of the guys in WWE’s main feuds was actually higher than that of the guys in TNA’s main feuds.

WWE is not having a ‘youth movement’, they’ve simply run out of stars and have been forced to put guys in spots they don’t deserve. That’s not a youth movement, it’s poor planning and poor management. Do you honestly believe that if guys like Undertaker, Triple H, Shawn Michaels and Batista were working full time you would have scrubs like the Miz as Champion? Of course not. WWE didn’t plan on losing all those guys, so they simply just picked a random member of the roster and gave him the belt (Sheamus, Miz, Swagger etc).

So my answer would be no. TNA should put who they believe are the biggest stars in their top spots, regardless of their age. It doesn’t matter if a wrestler is 5 or 55. If he’s entertaining and people are interested in his character, he should be put in a prominent spot. There is no point in just getting a load of untalented guys that may be younger just to stay “at least we’re in a youth movement”.

TNA is not in the WWE’s position to begin with. TNA actually have credible stars, so therefore there is no point in just removing that credible star because someone else is a couple of years younger than him. I couldn’t care less whether Mr Anderson was 5 or 55, at the end of the day he’s entertaining, therefore he should be in one of the top spots. And to the best of my knowledge, Sting is the only active wrestler that could be considered old.