Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
And unlike most other games it has free access to Battle.net where you can play online for [/i]free[/i]. You don't have to pay for it you just install the game, click on Multi-player and set everything up. If you don't want to play on Battle.net you can go online via a LAN and do it that way
Thanks for the shout out Lee. And X I may not convince anyone else to vote for my game but I'll damn sure try and have a great time doing it.
Diablo II came out in 200o and is one of the best games of that year acording to Gamespy.com.
wiki.com said:Halo was critically acclaimed and received an overall score of 97% on Metacritic. Electronic Gaming Monthly observed, "This game has me totally mesmerized ... [It] engages your intellect on a whole different level", and of its multiplayer, "GoldenEye was the multiplayer standard for console first-person shooters... It has been surpassed," awarding the game a perfect score. GameSpot claimed that "Halo's single-player game is worth picking up an Xbox for alone", commenting, "Not only is this easily the best of the Xbox launch games, but it's easily one of the best shooters ever, on any platform." IGN remarked similarly, calling Halo a "can't miss, no-brainer, sure thing, five star, triple A game." Edge called it "the most important launch game for any console, ever", and awarded it a 10 out of 10 score, only the fourth such rating in the magazine's 12-year history.
The game received numerous Game of the Year awards, including those of the Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences, Electronic Gaming Monthly, Edge, and IGN.The British Academy of Film and Television Arts awarded Halo "Best Console Game", and Rolling Stone presented it with their "Best Original Soundtrack" award. According to Xbox.com, the game received a total of 48 awards. Among the specific aspects that reviewers praised were the balance of weapons, the role of drivable vehicles, and the artificial intelligence of enemies.[
And unlike most other games it has free access to Battle.net where you can play online for [/i]free[/i]. You don't have to pay for it you just install the game, click on Multi-player and set everything up. If you don't want to play on Battle.net you can go online via a LAN and do it that way
IndeedWell. That's what this tourney is for. I'm looking forward to what you have to say.
You can really win reviews but i digress. Halo deserves every bit of Acclaim people have given it. Halo put Xbox on the map and is one of my favorite games. However in the end It is a FPS and i get bored with those a lot faster than some people. Like I sated above a person could spend weeks playing Diablo II and customizing there character. One of if not the biggest Criteria I'm using to vote is which game is more fun and in this case that Game is Diablo IIand here are mutliple reviews Halo won
Halo was critically acclaimed and received an overall score of 97% on Metacritic. Electronic Gaming Monthly observed, "This game has me totally mesmerized ... [It] engages your intellect on a whole different level", and of its multiplayer, "GoldenEye was the multiplayer standard for console FPS
... It has been surpassed," awarding the game a perfect score. GameSpot claimed that "Halo's single-player game is worth picking up an Xbox for alone", commenting, "Not only is this easily the best of the Xbox launch games, but it's easily one of the best shooters ever, on any platform." IGN remarked similarly, calling Halo a "can't miss, no-brainer, sure thing, five star, triple A game." Edge called it "the most important launch game for any console, ever", and awarded it a 10 out of 10 score, only the fourth such rating in the magazine's 12-year history.
The game received numerous Game of the Year awards, including those of the Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences, Electronic Gaming Monthly, Edge, and IGN.The British Academy of Film and Television Arts awarded Halo "Best Console Game", and Rolling Stone presented it with their "Best Original Soundtrack" award. According to Xbox.com, the game received a total of 48 awards. Among the specific aspects that reviewers praised were the balance of weapons, the role of drivable vehicles, and the artificial intelligence of enemies.
Free is always better than when you have to pay for it.By that logic every computer game that has multiplayer is better than any game that's only on the Xbox. And that doesn't make much sense.
Halo was one of the the greatest fps ever on computer and xbox. Online play is also free on the pc.Diablo II came out in 200o and is one of the best games of that year acording to Gamespy.com. And unlike most other games it has free access to Battle.net where you can play online for free. You don't have to pay for it you just install the game, click on Multi-player and set everything up. If you don't want to play on Battle.net you can go online via a LAN and do it that way
I don't see how this tells me which game is better. Halo is an FPS. It's not trying to be an rpg.As for the characters you can either be an Amazon, Necromaster, Barbarian, Sorceress or Paladin (left to right). Each has 3 distinct sets of spells and abilities you can use so you can customize you character the way you want it.
Not sure what your point is. Halo has a story too, and what you've described to me isn't exactly Heart of Darkness material.As for The story there are 4 different Acts in the game as well as different demons and such to kill. If you don't want to go it alone you can buy AI mercenaries to help in each level and they can level up and use items the the same way. you defeat 2 out of the 3 Prime Evils in Mephisto & Diablo with Diablo being the final boss in the game.
So you get to pay more money to finish the story. That's...cool?What about the 3rd Prime Evil you're asking yourself. Well that my friends is where the Expansion Diablo II: Lord of destruction comes in. Not only does it add another Act after you beat Diablo with Baal (Prime Evil #3) as the Main boss and a bunch of new Mini bosses you need to beat, You get 2 more Characters to choose from, the Assasin and The Druid.
So you're biased. Halo has amazing replay value. On the last day of school there were dozens of kids in the building playing Halo to celebrate the last few periods. That's one example that doesn't even cover the masses of people that still play Halo, Halo 2, and Halo 3 on a constant basis.First off I like RPGs better than FPSs any day of the week. Add to that the fact that Diablo II is so addictive with the way you can customize your character with different spells, abilites, weapons and armor and I will sit in front of my computer for weeks only getting up to go to the bathroom and to eat. I get bored with FPSs no matter what they are pretty quickly.
That isn't an argument for what is the better game. How much customization does Ocarina of Time offer? Not much besides weapon choices, which Halo has in spades.I only stated RPG > FPS at the end as my personal opinion, I added a lot more than that. such as the customazation power you have over your character, the different choices of characters you have and how the Expansion makes the games 100x better than the original.
Halo is one of the best reviewed games ever...and the rest of the series follows suit in critical acclaim.Some things I forgot in my origianl post is the reception it got after it's release. Lets start with the fact that it sold over 1,000,000 copies in 2 weeks making it one of the fastest sellin computer games ever. MetaCritic gave it a 86 out of 100, IGN gave it 8.3 out of 10 and Gamespot gave it an 8.5 out of 10.
I'm sure I could look up more Halo awards.Lets take a look at the awards it won. It was the Runner up for Gamespot Readr Choice award. It also won the "Computer Game of the Year", "Computer Role Playing Game of the Year", and "Game of the Year" awards from the Acadam of interactive Arts and Sciences at the 2001 Interactive Achievment Awards
And most people find Halo to be one of the most replayable and fun games of all time.You can really win reviews but i digress. Halo deserves every bit of Acclaim people have given it. Halo put Xbox on the map and is one of my favorite games. However in the end It is a FPS and i get bored with those a lot faster than some people. Like I sated above a person could spend weeks playing Diablo II and customizing there character. One of if not the biggest Criteria I'm using to vote is which game is more fun and in this case that Game is Diablo II
Free is always better than when you have to pay for it.
Someone tell me what's so good about Halo? It's just an average shoooter, and it gets hyped ridiculously - games like Unreal Tournament, Counter Strike, Team Fortress 2 etc are FAR FAR better, and any FPS that's primary platform is a console is automatically a fail in my books.
You can really win reviews but i digress. Halo deserves every bit of Acclaim people have given it. Halo put Xbox on the map and is one of my favorite games. However in the end It is a FPS and i get bored with those a lot faster than some people. Like I sated above a person could spend weeks playing Diablo II and customizing there character. One of if not the biggest Criteria I'm using to vote is which game is more fun and in this case that Game is Diablo II
Free is always better than when you have to pay for it.
You know those FPS that you listed? They took their shit from Halo. The gameplay and the multiplayer were all made to meet the standard set by Halo. It's graphics set a par every game had to meet after that. The physics engine set a bar every game had to meet. The multiplayer, everything. Team Fortress 2 is only half as good as it is because Halo came along first and said "If any game wants to be considered as even half-decent, they have to beat me."
Er, no. Unreal Tournament follows a formula it set itself before Halo was around, same as Counterstrike - these are two of the greatest FPS multiplayers ever - Halo is a step below. 32 players online > 4 people round an XBOX.
And I don't care about graphics - no one would be backing OoT or FFVII if graphics were a major consideration. My gripe is that the Halo gameplay is substandard compared to these other games.
Seriously, I voted for Diablo II because I've played it and found it more fun than Halo, and thought it was a better game in its genre than Halo was in its one. That's why I asked if someone could show me why Halo is a highly regarded FPS - and no one really did, they just said they themselves enjoyed it. And all you said was that it set the standard for two games that came out before it....
Er, no. Unreal Tournament follows a formula it set itself before Halo was around, same as Counterstrike - these are two of the greatest FPS multiplayers ever - Halo is a step below. 32 players online > 4 people round an XBOX.
And I don't care about graphics - no one would be backing OoT or FFVII if graphics were a major consideration. My gripe is that the Halo gameplay is substandard compared to these other games.
Seriously, I voted for Diablo II because I've played it and found it more fun than Halo, and thought it was a better game in its genre than Halo was in its one.
That's why I asked if someone could show me why Halo is a highly regarded FPS - and no one really did, they just said they themselves enjoyed it. And all you said was that it set the standard for two games that came out before it....
OK, so i was off with the release dates of Counterstrike and Unreal Tournament. So, so sorry. Doesn't change the fact that Halo set the standard for every FPS that came out after that. You heard "That game is OK, but it's no Halo." Not "Halo is good, but it's not Unreal Tournament 15000." I also never heard anyone say "Wow, Halo sucks compared to Unreal Tournament or Counterstrike." No one. Reviews, fellow friends, no where. It was "Halo is a genre defining game. Get it now. DO IT."
Everything else you said was "I just like Diablo II more." Which isn't an argument at all.
Piece of crap? That's laughable. Halo has near universal critical acclaim.I voted for Diablo II, and while I can't force anyone to do the same - I highly suggest pushing the piece of crap that is Halo, out of this Tournament before it gets any undue weight behind it.
That really doesn't matter. Halo is influential, which is different than revolutionary.Why Halo Isn't Revolutionary:
It is influential. That means other FPS have tried to reach it's level and failed, and that it has broken into the mainstream life more than almost any other game.Anyone who thinks this game is revolutionary needs to help me to understand why, first and foremost. Its not. Its a regular FPS, and its not even one of its kind. Goldeneye revolutionized the gaming world with FPS games - on a console with less ability than the 360.
Thousands of people still play Halo, Halo 2, and Halo 3. That shows it's staying power(in literature, that's one of the ways you tell the difference between great and really good).The only reason why most people go ape-shit over Halo, is because it was one of the first FPS games to be playable online in an online community that is huge. If Goldeneye were made in Halo's place, I guarantee no one would give two shits about this second rate, piece of crap FPS.
You enjoyed another FPS more than Halo?On this note, I've also played games like Red Faction and had more enjoyment than I ever did out of Halo. I've never understood the concept or the enjoyment of why people get so wrapped up in Halo. Goldeneye had actual people and realistic environments. Red Faction was kinda borderline on realistic environment and people, but wasn't flat-out futuristic like Halo is trying (badly) to be.
Too bad that they aren't in the match...and you're citing some all time greats. How does that affect this match.Other games I can think of that take place well above and beyond Halo are as follows; (in no specific order) Call of Duty, Perfect Dark, Metroid, Doom & Half Life.
You mean it wasn't as successful? Halo is incredibly successful on both the xbox and the cpu.UNfortunately it looks like Halo may take this - but it won't be because its worth anything. I think Diablo is losing, mainly because it wasn't as mainstream on any actual gaming system as far as it was a mainstream cpu game.
Halo deserves to go far. It doesn't deserver to win, but it deserves to get out of the starting gate when it's facing an opponent like this.I'd once again urge people to vote Diablo - if for no other reason than to get Halo out early, because I'd really rather not see this piece of crap advance anywhere.
It is influential. That means other FPS have tried to reach it's level and failed, and that it has broken into the mainstream life more than almost any other game.
Thousands of people still play Halo, Halo 2, and Halo 3. That shows it's staying power(in literature, that's one of the ways you tell the difference between great and really good).