Question about the advertising rule

[Coco]

I want to red rep people and tell them to go back to (that site Crocker likes).

Implying that (that site Crocker likes) is the only place low enough for pond scum like (recipient of red rep).

Would this violate the advertising rule?

I might just write it exactly as I wrote it there, brackets and all. Reading it back, the vagueness adds something.

 

[ABMorales787]

Technically yeah. It would be since its a private message sent through rep. Even if its red. If he reports it, it might be an issue.

 

[Coco]

Boo!

In the words of a great fictional character, we need to say no to the nanny state, "boo to nanny," and claw back some personal responsibility in the name of common sense.

A little Jools Holland wordplay there to satisfy the masses.

 

[Find'er Woo'er Ryder]

What if he mispels it? Like instead of saying (site the crocker likes) say readalloverit or some shit.

 

[ABMorales787]

Point is, you could but if he reports it, you run the risk of someone caring.

 

[Coco]

It's me. I assume everyone cares.

 

[Uncle Sam]

You used to be a renegade, man.

 

[Lee]

What's that about advertising rules?

I guess you should have...read it.

 

[Stone Cold Tea]

Haha that's pathetic

 

[Coco]

Not sure what you're referring to, Brockie.

I'll red rep you just for good measure.

You used to be a renegade, man.

I still wear jackets made from animal parts. I've still got it!

What's that about advertising rules?

I guess you should have...read it.

Not Jools Holland wordplay, but still pretty good.

 

[Stone Cold Tea]

The fact you would get a warning or infraction

 

[Good Golly It's Ollie]

I didn't realise the advertising rule included merely typing the name. Do we have to censor it like "R*dd*t" or something? Actually I think I like that, makes it look like the dirty word it is. I'd like to request a WWF logo blur type thing as well.

 

[Hyorinmaru]

It doesn't. The rules comes into play when you're telling someone to leave here for somewhere else.

 

[Dowdsy McDowds]

Boo!

In the words of a great fictional character, we need to say no to the nanny state, "boo to nanny," and claw back some personal responsibility in the name of common sense.

A little Jools Holland wordplay there to satisfy the masses.

Of all the places I'd expect to see a Thick of It reference, this thread wasn't one of them.

Also, isn't @Dearwrestler's username advertising?

 

[ShinChan]

Not sure what you're referring to, Brockie.

I'll red rep you just for good measure.


I still wear jackets made from animal parts. I've still got it!


Not Jools Holland wordplay, but still pretty good.

You can red rep me and say me to go to that site if you really want me to go there and leave this forum. I promise I willnot report you

 

[Reflection]

So which one is it... F******k or Re****?

 

[George Steele's Barber]

This thread is almost as good as Pizza Hut's new $5 Flavor Menu. All that great selection at not much cost hits the spot at any time.

But this thread is pretty good too.

 

[BaconBits]

Your dick pics aren't advertising, Coco. A angry inchworm isn't worthy of advertisement.

 

[Coco]

This thread is almost as good as Pizza Hut's new $5 Flavor Menu. All that great selection at not much cost hits the spot at any time.

But this thread is pretty good too.

Figured I ought to get an early start on the 2016 EOY award race.

 

[George Steele's Barber]

I get a head start every day by starting things off with some Jimmy Dean Sausage. They're delicious and can be found in your local grocer's frozen food aisle.

 

[Serious Mozzarella]

So you guys not allowed to mention SC? Did Sly or KB get banned from there or something? I just looked in the prison and our good old Bolf (who's now a G-mod, congrats) had outright banned someone for mentioning it, and called it "advertising". Why the rule?