QF TDigle vs. Remix

Discussion in 'Cigar Lounge Debator's League' started by FromTheSouth, Apr 25, 2010.

  1. FromTheSouth

    FromTheSouth You don't want it with me.

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    768
    Likes Received:
    843
    Me, TM, and Tastycles will judge

    TDigle will affirm

    Resolved: Unless in default of loan conditions, the salaries of executives at private firms who accept public bailout funds are not subject to government review.
     
    #1
  2. Remix

    Remix Is a thin rope

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,103
    Likes Received:
    846
    T-Diggle has yet to post, so I guess I'll start the bidding.

    I'm going to argue that the salaries of executives at private firms who accept public bailout funds should be subject to to government review. The reasons for my stance on this matter will be outlined and explained below.

    The first reason that the government should have some say in the pay of executives is that the government owns a part of the company. This in effect means that as a shareholder of a company they have every right to look over the salaries of the coroprate brass, if for no other reason than to see where their bailout money is spent.

    For example, if you gave a private company $5 million (and it's worth $50 million), as a bailout, you own 10% of that company. Given how much of this company you own, you'd most certainly have the right to review the budget of this company.

    Leading on from this point is that the government's bailout money was given for just that, to make sure that bailed out buisnesses don't go under. They aren't giving these companies millions of dollars so that the people who ran the company to the ground can keep picking up massive pay checks. To ensure that this isn't the case I'd say that the government (who as established above can be considered as a shareholder) the right to review the company's budget.

    likewise leading on from the above analogy, if we replace 'private company' with 'hospital' and add 'to buy new scanning equipment', you'd be at liberty to review the budget to see if the money you gave the hospital is given to buy that new scanner, and not pay the higherups.

    In conclusion, giving a company bail out money so that the bailed out company can continue to exist does give the government the right to look over a company's budget to ensure that the money is being spent sensibly. Because a company's budget naturally includes the pay of the executives. So yes the government does in this case have the right to review the pay of the top people in the company.
     
    #2
    Cena's Little Helper likes this.
  3. Cena's Little Helper

    Cena's Little Helper Mid-Card Championship Winner

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    1,646
    Likes Received:
    1,494
    I was going to argue tonight, but, this would be totally unfair to Remix, who didn't procrastinate like myself. FTS, I am so, so sorry to say that I have decided to instead put my energy and time into the Wrestlezone Tournament. Remix, I wish you the best of luck in the playoffs.
     
    #3
  4. FromTheSouth

    FromTheSouth You don't want it with me.

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    768
    Likes Received:
    843
    Remix wins. Thanks for being honest TDigs.
     
    #4

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"