Jack-Hammer
YOU WILL RESPECT MY AUTHORITAH!!!!
I came across this story on CNN.com a few minutes ago and I thought it was interesting. Professional poker player Phil Ivey is being sued by the Borgada Hotel Casino & Spa in Atlantic City, New Jersey. The casino is stating that Ivey noticed a defect in the cards being used in a game of Baccarat back in 2012 and used his knowledge of the defect to win $9.6 million from the casino.
The suit alleges that the some of the cards made by Gemaco turned out to not have a perfectly symmetrical design on the back of the card. Ivey, the suit claims, was able to figure out what the first card to be dealt was, thereby giving him a significant advantage over the house, or casino. The casino was using cards made by a company called Gemaco and that they were being dealt via an automatic shuffler. Ivey and his partner, Cheng Yin Sun, are alleged to have practiced edge sorting to, in effect, mark the cards by forcing the dealer to handle the cards in a way such that the leading edges of the strategically important cards could be distinguished from the leading edges of the other cards in the deck. This, the casino says, is why Ivey wanted to keep the same deck and the automatic shuffler, which would leave the orientation of the cards unchanged.
However, this isn't the first time that Ivey has been accused of "edge sorting." Mayfair club Crockfords, a London-based casino, withheld £7.8 million from him after it believed he used the tactic to work the system and gain an unfair advantage over the house in baccarat. In this case, Ivey was also accompanied by a Chinese associate. The associate began the process of "edge sorting" by identifying which cards were good and bad. Over time, Ivey was able to determine one card from another simply by looking at the edges. According to the lawsuit he filed against Crockfords, Ivey admits to being an "advantage player"someone who finds legal means to improve the odds of winning. He also argued that the casino should've been well aware of the process of "edge sorting" and figured out a way to stop it.
Personally, I thought this was a little funny. I don't follow poker the way that some have begun to over the course of the last decade or so, but I honestly can't say that I disagree with Ivey's perspective. These are professional gambling establishments, they exist to fleece people of their money in games of chance that the casino owners & management themselves know they have very little chance of losing. I can't say that the games are rigged but, in all honesty, there's a very strong probability that some of them are. After all, even if we suspected we were being cheated, we have no way to prove it. All the various rules and regulations set up by state gaming commissions essentially render casinos bulletproof. Unless you're able to somehow detect cheating going on right before your eyes, demonstrate how the cheating is being done and have enough eyewitnesses to back up your claim, you don't have a leg to stand on.
The suit alleges that the some of the cards made by Gemaco turned out to not have a perfectly symmetrical design on the back of the card. Ivey, the suit claims, was able to figure out what the first card to be dealt was, thereby giving him a significant advantage over the house, or casino. The casino was using cards made by a company called Gemaco and that they were being dealt via an automatic shuffler. Ivey and his partner, Cheng Yin Sun, are alleged to have practiced edge sorting to, in effect, mark the cards by forcing the dealer to handle the cards in a way such that the leading edges of the strategically important cards could be distinguished from the leading edges of the other cards in the deck. This, the casino says, is why Ivey wanted to keep the same deck and the automatic shuffler, which would leave the orientation of the cards unchanged.
However, this isn't the first time that Ivey has been accused of "edge sorting." Mayfair club Crockfords, a London-based casino, withheld £7.8 million from him after it believed he used the tactic to work the system and gain an unfair advantage over the house in baccarat. In this case, Ivey was also accompanied by a Chinese associate. The associate began the process of "edge sorting" by identifying which cards were good and bad. Over time, Ivey was able to determine one card from another simply by looking at the edges. According to the lawsuit he filed against Crockfords, Ivey admits to being an "advantage player"someone who finds legal means to improve the odds of winning. He also argued that the casino should've been well aware of the process of "edge sorting" and figured out a way to stop it.
Personally, I thought this was a little funny. I don't follow poker the way that some have begun to over the course of the last decade or so, but I honestly can't say that I disagree with Ivey's perspective. These are professional gambling establishments, they exist to fleece people of their money in games of chance that the casino owners & management themselves know they have very little chance of losing. I can't say that the games are rigged but, in all honesty, there's a very strong probability that some of them are. After all, even if we suspected we were being cheated, we have no way to prove it. All the various rules and regulations set up by state gaming commissions essentially render casinos bulletproof. Unless you're able to somehow detect cheating going on right before your eyes, demonstrate how the cheating is being done and have enough eyewitnesses to back up your claim, you don't have a leg to stand on.