Money In The Bank, Is It Gonna Happen At WM?

[Johnny Scumm]

As you all know, we have a Money In The Bank Pay-Per-View now. However, there's also the annual Wrestlemania Money In The Bank as well. That means we have 3 in one Year. That's more MITB's than Elimination Chambers. Not right, is it? When the the Money In The Bank Contract means SO much, why give out 3 in one Year? That's crazy. Now, the Pay-Per-View is fine. Having one winner off of each brand is cool. Last year, we had Kane and The Miz. Kane became Champs the same night, Miz took some time over cashing his in. We saw one brand new Champ eventually come out of the situation, in The Miz. He is the current WWE Champ, facing Cena at Wrestlemania.

So, anyways, at Wrestlemania, there is an annual Money In The Bank Match. This takes place without fail. However, with the Pay-Per-View dedicated to the Match, do we really need the Wrestlemania one? If we don't, what replaces it? This year, maybe there's a big Ladder Match, where not in the center of the Ring, but in Two different corners, there is the United States Championship and the Intercontinental Championship. You have Daniel Bryan, Kofi Kingston and 6 other men fighting it out for not one, but TWO Titles. 8 Men, 2 Titles. Sounds interesting? What can add to the "suspense", is say one man pulls down one Title, he is obviously Champ. He can still carry on in this match, trying to get the other Title as well. For all we know, we can end up with Defending Champs, New Champs OR the Same Champ for both Titles.

What do you guys think?

 

[Sully]

Usually they start talking about MITB after EC. If they don't say anything next week, it's not going to happen.

 

[Johnny Scumm]

Exactly what I thought. I thought Qualifiers were the 1st week after EC. So if there's not Qualifiers on Monday, it's either not happening or they're just gonna pick the guys.