as much as people like bringing up old guys being champions in promotions like ecw (and i was one of the 100k people who watched and liked the original ecw), it DOES NOT work for a promotion that is trying to be a top contender.
I agree with you about veterans and how TNA would be going the wrong way if they had Hall as Champion. I am giving you that. But in no way, shape, or form can TNA be looked at as a top contender now. Yes, I am saying it now and I am not bashing TNA. They lost the Monday Night Wars II and it wasn't to Stone Cold or The Rock either. The feud cannot be taken seriously anymore. As of now I doubt a veteran like Hall (who has never held the World Title unlike Luther, Hogan, Flair, Sting, or Nash) can really jeopardize the business. You can make anything look good in wrestling if you try; that's why Undertaker and Triple H are still badass even if they have been in for so long.
I am ECW nostalgic as my name suggests, so it isn't a big deal to me for an old guy to go over younger dudes in their prime (Terry Funk). But he was practically the ONLY elder talent they had. It was a golden moment and that is all.
BUT WCW had many, many aged veterans in the Main Scene for a very long time. That is my argument. Yes, TNA has old people but none are really in the Main Scene excluding Hogan or even Flair.
the storybook finish for a guy way past his prime does not work to make a product more popular because most of todays fans will have no idea of the story.
I look around and see many, many people here who know of or have heard of Hall and his accomplishments. And if they haven't, well the internet is a maven for news and finding out things. They can always look it up. On the big screen though you can still paint the story of a respected guy and everything he has done in the business.
ex. Shawn Michaels or Ric Flair
You cannot tell me no one had a clue who these 2 were when they tune in. Even if they have never seen them in the ring, WWE casted commercials highlighting their career and promos for Wrestlemania and it was hard not to find them on cable. Even if you weren't a fan of wrestling you knew these two were important in their field, and even the commercials made you
feel like they did much for the business.
the normal wrestling fan or someone that is not a fan tuning in for the first time seeing a guy like scott hall as champion will flip the channel and not look back.
I, like many others, randomly started watching wrestling. The first guy I saw holding a championship in his hand looked pink, was unshaven as hell, and sported a sweaty bandana over his forehead. This was Undertaker as The American Badass. He was talking to a bald, equally unshaven guy who was whiter than white (until that is Sheamus came along), wearing a black speedo of all things and his voice was hillbilly as crap. He was Stone Cold Steve Austin.
Looks can be decieving. Just because a guy looks a certain way doesn't mean we should judge. After all, wonder what a random viewer would have thought of when seeing Dusty Rhodes or Ric Flair for that matter for the first time. Fat guy in speedo vs. guy wearing an extremely flamboyant robe. I am sure many looked away.
doing something like this is for indy wrestling, not a major promotion.
raf
Veterans have gotten over younger stars in ALL promotions. Usually because of their name and how much they draw in and put asses in seats. Now personally I don't think TNA will lose many fans if Scott Hall was released, but he does add some Old-School flair which isn't too bad, considering Both WWE and the defunct WCW had the same veteran thing going for quite some time. As for indy...the wisest move they could do would try to sign on someone who has played with the big names of wrestling in WCW and WWF(E) to give their little business more credibility. But as a major promotion it would be wise to use Hall as a stepping stone so to speak. I'm not talking of him winning The Big One though that would in fact be different. Just think they should push him to contendership.