Not all bands remain the same throughout their entire existence. Members are switched around on occasions, some of the older bands have been making big changes in their lineups.
Some of these changes are considered a good thing (Dave Mustaine getting kicked out of Metallica in favor of Kirk Hammett, I'd say that's a good exchange, especially considering Dave went on to do just fine in another band).
There are many many more examples of good changes in lineups that have been made. However there are certainly also lineup changes that have gone on to become a bad thing for the band. Something where the fans might feel that the band lost either an important member, or lost the whole thing they had going.
This thread is to focus on both aspects. Good changes, as well as bad changes for a band.
I'll go ahead and start with the good changes.
Metallica: Changing out Dave Mustaine for Kirk Hammett, Kirk is by far my favorite guitarist, and I cannot help but think that I would've had a worse look at Metallica if Kirk Hammett wasn't in there.
Linkin Park / Xero: Having Mark Wakefield leave and then recruiting Chester Bennington is something I definitely feel was a career altering thing in the potential of Linkin Park, or more noticeable around that time; Xero.
And onto the bad changes.
Metallica: Yep these guys have done it all in terms of good and bad changes if you ask me. When James Newsted left Metallica and we got Robert Trujillo, bad change if you ask me. I always loved Newsted and I've considered him to be one of my favorite bassists of all time. And while I love Robert Trujillo as well, there's just something missing over him that I can't put my finger on, something that Newsted had.
Red Hot Chili Peppers: John Frusciante leaving and being replaced by Josh Klinghoffer. Yeah I don't approve, I understand John wanted to leave, that's his choice. However I didn't really like it, because I loved the guitar play by John, and I don't think Red Hot Chili Peppers are quite the same without him.
Some of these changes are considered a good thing (Dave Mustaine getting kicked out of Metallica in favor of Kirk Hammett, I'd say that's a good exchange, especially considering Dave went on to do just fine in another band).
There are many many more examples of good changes in lineups that have been made. However there are certainly also lineup changes that have gone on to become a bad thing for the band. Something where the fans might feel that the band lost either an important member, or lost the whole thing they had going.
This thread is to focus on both aspects. Good changes, as well as bad changes for a band.
I'll go ahead and start with the good changes.
Metallica: Changing out Dave Mustaine for Kirk Hammett, Kirk is by far my favorite guitarist, and I cannot help but think that I would've had a worse look at Metallica if Kirk Hammett wasn't in there.
Linkin Park / Xero: Having Mark Wakefield leave and then recruiting Chester Bennington is something I definitely feel was a career altering thing in the potential of Linkin Park, or more noticeable around that time; Xero.
And onto the bad changes.
Metallica: Yep these guys have done it all in terms of good and bad changes if you ask me. When James Newsted left Metallica and we got Robert Trujillo, bad change if you ask me. I always loved Newsted and I've considered him to be one of my favorite bassists of all time. And while I love Robert Trujillo as well, there's just something missing over him that I can't put my finger on, something that Newsted had.
Red Hot Chili Peppers: John Frusciante leaving and being replaced by Josh Klinghoffer. Yeah I don't approve, I understand John wanted to leave, that's his choice. However I didn't really like it, because I loved the guitar play by John, and I don't think Red Hot Chili Peppers are quite the same without him.