Main eventers, by default, tend to be liked by the majority, hence why they get their postitions. However, everyone's tastes are different, and there are some wrestlers that people just can't stand. The point of this thread is to say who your least favourite main eventer is and why. The rules are as follows:
1) Normal house rules apply
2) That includes spamming
3) A main eventer is someone who has had a sustained period of holding and/or fighting for world titles on a regular basis. By this definition somebody like British Bulldog probably doesn't count.
4) You can disect other people's choices if you want, but notice I'm asking for an opinion not who was objectively the worst wrestler.
For me, it has got to be Brock Lesnar. I found his characteristics dull to a ridiculous level, and furthermore his in ring style was totally unappealing. It was built around a strength that wasn't that impressive for his size - Cena's feats of strength are far more awe inspiring, nor was it as grossly powerful as guys like Henry. He wasn't that fast, and he didn't conduct himself very meticulously either, giving way to stupid mistakes a lot of the time.
I'm not as much of a Heyman ********er as everyone else seems to be, so that aspect offered zero saving grace, and all I saw was a boring failed athlete. As it happened, he hadn't failed at being an athlete and he moved on, but Lesnar's absolute lack of likability is what made me witch off wrestling in 2002, and not return until 2008.
1) Normal house rules apply
2) That includes spamming
3) A main eventer is someone who has had a sustained period of holding and/or fighting for world titles on a regular basis. By this definition somebody like British Bulldog probably doesn't count.
4) You can disect other people's choices if you want, but notice I'm asking for an opinion not who was objectively the worst wrestler.
For me, it has got to be Brock Lesnar. I found his characteristics dull to a ridiculous level, and furthermore his in ring style was totally unappealing. It was built around a strength that wasn't that impressive for his size - Cena's feats of strength are far more awe inspiring, nor was it as grossly powerful as guys like Henry. He wasn't that fast, and he didn't conduct himself very meticulously either, giving way to stupid mistakes a lot of the time.
I'm not as much of a Heyman ********er as everyone else seems to be, so that aspect offered zero saving grace, and all I saw was a boring failed athlete. As it happened, he hadn't failed at being an athlete and he moved on, but Lesnar's absolute lack of likability is what made me witch off wrestling in 2002, and not return until 2008.