Wow, a lot of Kelly hate!!! I'll admit that I was one of those fanatic Kelly haters when she first came to the WWE, but she has gone above and beyond ANY expectations I had for her. I rank her only below women like Melina, Beth, Natalya, and Mickie, and there are reasons for that. One of the things I like most about Kelly is she didn't do what Candice did when she first started wrestling, and that's try to incorporate too many new moves without getting the basics first. She definitely had her mishaps in her beginning matches with Layla, but seeing as Layla at the time was also learning to wrestle, I wasn't expecting gold out of those matches. However, fast forward to Kelly's matches with Victoria and now Beth and you have a someone who's managed to work out the kinks and can shine with experienced workers (much like Trish did with Ivory, Jacqueline, etc). She also manages to get something that very few divas in the WWE get, and that's a reaction and a good one at that. In fact behind Mickie, Kelly is the best diva face at the moment (as much as I do love Melina and Candice they just dont cut it yet as face divas).
HBK-aholic said:
Then, what do you get? Kelly Kelly most likely doing playboy, therefore defintely gettign the belt. Seriously, I'll eat my hand if she doesn't get the belt when agreeing to do playboy.
Kelly will most likely do Playboy, and if that happens there'll probably be a WM match, but I doubt that she'll get the title. None of the PB matches at WM end with the PB diva winning.
HBK-aholic said:
]Because this is the farce the womens division has turned into. You get a belt if show your flesh. Whoever shows the most, wins. It's awful.
That is such a misconception. Let's run through our Women's Champions in the past couple of years. Mickie, Beth, Candice, Melina, Mickie, Melina, Lita, Trish, Lita, Mickie, and Trish. You say that "you get a belt if you show your flesh," but NONE of these divas got a belt for just posing in Playboy, not even Candice (her PB pictorial was a full year before she got the title). Even Michelle, who I am definitely NOT a fan of, worked for the Diva's Championship for more than three years.
HBK-aholic said:
This is the one thing I hate about the WWE. I want to see female wrestling, not a pair of boobs slapping another pair of boobs. That's all Kelly Kelly wrestling is. Because she is AWFUL in the ring, as are most divas.
That's the one thing I hate about a lot of fans, their one-sided views of the women's division. I hate how people will so quickly put down someone like Kelly Kelly just because of the way she came into the WWE. So what if she didn't spend years in the indys? Neither did Victoria or Trish for that matter and look how far they've come. What is "Kelly Kelly wrestling" and why is it a bad thing? She sells well, she can wrestle now without botching (usually), she gets a good reaction- what more can we ask of her? WWE still HAS female wrestling, the Melina vs Beth feud was an example of how great it could be if the divas weren't held back by limiting and repetitive storylines, though I do love how the direction the division is in now what with the Katie vs Mickie feud and the Kelly vs Beth interaction.
Flames Out
Dragon