I was considering putting this in the Sports Section, but ultimately decided it was more fitting as a CL thread. While it is an examination of a football player, and his actions on the field, it examines far more then statistics, scores, and standings. At the heart of the matter is the personal beliefs of one man, how his actions on the field reflect those beliefs, and the resulting backlash that has resulted. Ultimately, isn't news the exploration of the private life of a person that plays out within the public eye? I certainly think so. The following article by Jamele Smith of ESPN.com looks at what has become known as Tebowing It, and the backlash from the Lions/Broncos game on Sunday with regards to Tebow's faith.
http://espn.go.com/espn/commentary/story/_/id/7177658/lions-players-disrespected-tim-tebow-faith
For those who aren't aware, "Tebowing It" is QB Tim Tebow of the Denver Broncos way of expressing his gratitude to God following scoring plays by getting down on one knee as a form of prayer. Controversy around it arose during the Detroit Lions 45-10 pummelling of Tebow's Bronocs this past Sunday. At least two Lions- former teammate Tony Scheffler following a one yard TD catch and LB Steven Tulloch after sacking Tebow- openly mocked Tebow by assuming the same pose. When criticism around Tulloch's antics were directed to him via Twitter, Tulloch responded with the following:
Hill, in the article above, said the following regarding Tulloch and Scheffler.
Im assuming that the significance of what Hill is describing here is the fact that Christianity is "America's religion", with 76% of Americans claiming themself to be Christian. Since Judaism and Islam are minority religions here, I'm sure arguments of discrimination are being what's taken into consideration by Hill. Looking at the converse, what I gather from her opinion is that the mocking of Tebow's expression of faith could simply be viewed as from "one Christian to another", if one is to buy the 76% argument(although the "actively practicing" is about 34%) Simply put, Christianity is a far more accepted religion then others within the US, which undoubtably in my mind has lead many a sports journalist to label criticism towards Scheffler and Tullock an overreaction. Hill acknowledges as much:
Certainly, Tebow falls into the category of the 34% who actively practice Christianity. To me, it's a refreshing change from the Antonie Cromartie's who've fathered 10 children with 8 women, the Brandon Marshall's who get into knife fights with their spouse, and even my hometown QB Ben Roethlisberger who has escaped two allegations of rape. Certainly, noone truly knows what Tebow does in his private life, but there's yet to be a hint of impropriety raised. About this, Hill says the following:
It's really a double-edged source here, in my mind. Tebow is proud of his faith and not ashamed to stand up for what he believes in, at all times, it seems. And what's not commendable about that? Someone who feels so strongly about how they believe that they're willing to open themselves up to extra scrutiny, which generally occurs when someone is so vocal about their belief in their faith. And Tebow, to his credit, has passed every test. Good play and bad, win or loss, Tebow's demonstration of his faith and his lifestyle remain wholesome.
As we all know, however, someone who puts themselves into the spotlight, for good reasons or bad, leave themselves open to scrutiny, and yes, even find themselves the butt of jokes. With the good, there's often an undercutting of jealousy that comes with it. For those who are professional sports fans, there are a littany of players who are drafted later then their talent suggests because of character concerns. Tebow is the only example of a player I can recall who is considered by many to have been drafted high because of his positive character. Tebow was selected in the late first round of the NFL draft 2 years ago by Denver, far higher then he had been projected or his talent suggests. And even though Tebow denies it bothers him or thaat he's affected by it in any way, how easy would it be to be on the receiving end of numerous jokes about your faith with regards to your play? One such example was tweeted from comedian Dennis Miller Monday:
Hill said the following about the above in her article:
Maybe this is apples and oranges, but isn't it partly on Tebow? I find no fault in his actions, make no mistake, but aren't his actions are what open him up to the way in which he's depicted? As Kim Kardashian is an easy target for making millions off her 72 day wedding, isn't Tebow an easy target for very publicly relishing in being a virgin and showing his faith in unique ways? Ones personal faith and their proud displays of it in comparison to a very public marriage and rediculously short end to it are far different things, but haven't both benefitted from it? Should he be open to the same criticism for his faith because of his benefit(such as shoe deals and nutrition supplement commercials) from it that Kim is for the money she made because of her marriage and the quick end to it?
Hill concludes her article with the following:
I respect Tim Tebow in the same way I respect someone who makes a stand for something they believe in a noticeable way. As long as said person does so in a fashion that doesn't harm others, I commend them for standing up for how they believe, and I personally have a hard time making fun of them in any way. Personally, I agree with Hill, for the most part, but I understand the varying opinions. Tebow is, deservedly or not, an open target for critics because of his openness and very public displays of faith. But I do see the opposite side of the devout nature of faith for him, and Hill's point about respecting it is a valid one. I'm sure there are a variety of opinions here, and I don't believe there's a singular right answer either.
Should Tebows faith be off-limits to mocking/jokes because of how seriously he takes it?
Were the Detroit Lions players disrespectul for "Tebowing It" in the celebratory nature in which they did?
Any other thoughts or discussion on this topic are more then welcome.
http://espn.go.com/espn/commentary/story/_/id/7177658/lions-players-disrespected-tim-tebow-faith
For those who aren't aware, "Tebowing It" is QB Tim Tebow of the Denver Broncos way of expressing his gratitude to God following scoring plays by getting down on one knee as a form of prayer. Controversy around it arose during the Detroit Lions 45-10 pummelling of Tebow's Bronocs this past Sunday. At least two Lions- former teammate Tony Scheffler following a one yard TD catch and LB Steven Tulloch after sacking Tebow- openly mocked Tebow by assuming the same pose. When criticism around Tulloch's antics were directed to him via Twitter, Tulloch responded with the following:
"Football is a form of entertainment. Have a sense of humor. I wasn't mocking GOD!"
Hill, in the article above, said the following regarding Tulloch and Scheffler.
Tulloch and Scheffler probably didn't intend to disrespect Tebow's faith with their celebrations. But if Tebow were Muslim or Jewish, would Tulloch and Scheffler have been so quick to execute a prayer parody?Would columnists encourage those who were offended by Tulloch's and Scheffler's Tebowing to just lighten up?
Im assuming that the significance of what Hill is describing here is the fact that Christianity is "America's religion", with 76% of Americans claiming themself to be Christian. Since Judaism and Islam are minority religions here, I'm sure arguments of discrimination are being what's taken into consideration by Hill. Looking at the converse, what I gather from her opinion is that the mocking of Tebow's expression of faith could simply be viewed as from "one Christian to another", if one is to buy the 76% argument(although the "actively practicing" is about 34%) Simply put, Christianity is a far more accepted religion then others within the US, which undoubtably in my mind has lead many a sports journalist to label criticism towards Scheffler and Tullock an overreaction. Hill acknowledges as much:
Yes, from the beginning, Tebow has willingly used his platform as a high-profile athlete to promote Christianity. In college, he wore eye-black with Bible verses on them and revealed to the media he was a virgin. During last year's Super Bowl, he appeared in a pro-life commercial that was sponsored by Focus on Family, a global, conservative Christian ministry. And Tebow's autobiography -- which espouses many of his principles regarding faith -- debuted at No. 6 on the New York Times bestseller list in June.
Certainly, Tebow falls into the category of the 34% who actively practice Christianity. To me, it's a refreshing change from the Antonie Cromartie's who've fathered 10 children with 8 women, the Brandon Marshall's who get into knife fights with their spouse, and even my hometown QB Ben Roethlisberger who has escaped two allegations of rape. Certainly, noone truly knows what Tebow does in his private life, but there's yet to be a hint of impropriety raised. About this, Hill says the following:
Even though people often complain about how they wish more athletes had a wholesome image, there's a sizable faction who find the media coverage of Tebow's success and his commitment to his faith nauseating.
And now that he's floundering professionally, they aren't afraid to use Tebow's religion as a punch line.
It's really a double-edged source here, in my mind. Tebow is proud of his faith and not ashamed to stand up for what he believes in, at all times, it seems. And what's not commendable about that? Someone who feels so strongly about how they believe that they're willing to open themselves up to extra scrutiny, which generally occurs when someone is so vocal about their belief in their faith. And Tebow, to his credit, has passed every test. Good play and bad, win or loss, Tebow's demonstration of his faith and his lifestyle remain wholesome.
As we all know, however, someone who puts themselves into the spotlight, for good reasons or bad, leave themselves open to scrutiny, and yes, even find themselves the butt of jokes. With the good, there's often an undercutting of jealousy that comes with it. For those who are professional sports fans, there are a littany of players who are drafted later then their talent suggests because of character concerns. Tebow is the only example of a player I can recall who is considered by many to have been drafted high because of his positive character. Tebow was selected in the late first round of the NFL draft 2 years ago by Denver, far higher then he had been projected or his talent suggests. And even though Tebow denies it bothers him or thaat he's affected by it in any way, how easy would it be to be on the receiving end of numerous jokes about your faith with regards to your play? One such example was tweeted from comedian Dennis Miller Monday:
Jesus must be thinking even Judas had a better release than this guy.
Hill said the following about the above in her article:
Several of ESPN's NFL analysts have been quick to point out the other successful college quarterbacks with Tebow's limitations who never received an NFL start and certainly weren't drafted in the first round.
Tebow is a juicy target because he receives so much media coverage and he's often depicted as a Goody Two-Shoes. It's not Tebow's fault, but it makes it that much easier for his critics to revel in his failures and give extra motivation to his opponents.
Maybe this is apples and oranges, but isn't it partly on Tebow? I find no fault in his actions, make no mistake, but aren't his actions are what open him up to the way in which he's depicted? As Kim Kardashian is an easy target for making millions off her 72 day wedding, isn't Tebow an easy target for very publicly relishing in being a virgin and showing his faith in unique ways? Ones personal faith and their proud displays of it in comparison to a very public marriage and rediculously short end to it are far different things, but haven't both benefitted from it? Should he be open to the same criticism for his faith because of his benefit(such as shoe deals and nutrition supplement commercials) from it that Kim is for the money she made because of her marriage and the quick end to it?
Hill concludes her article with the following:
Imitating someone's prayer pose after a sack isn't the same as Clay Matthews flexing his biceps following a big play. It's not the same as Shawne Merriman doing his "Lights Out" dance after demolishing a quarterback.
Prayer is a sacred component of any religion. Making fun of someone else's spiritual connection is on par with ridiculing them about their family. You don't have to be a Christian to get that, just someone who understands the concept of respect.
I respect Tim Tebow in the same way I respect someone who makes a stand for something they believe in a noticeable way. As long as said person does so in a fashion that doesn't harm others, I commend them for standing up for how they believe, and I personally have a hard time making fun of them in any way. Personally, I agree with Hill, for the most part, but I understand the varying opinions. Tebow is, deservedly or not, an open target for critics because of his openness and very public displays of faith. But I do see the opposite side of the devout nature of faith for him, and Hill's point about respecting it is a valid one. I'm sure there are a variety of opinions here, and I don't believe there's a singular right answer either.
Should Tebows faith be off-limits to mocking/jokes because of how seriously he takes it?
Were the Detroit Lions players disrespectul for "Tebowing It" in the celebratory nature in which they did?
Any other thoughts or discussion on this topic are more then welcome.