AegonTargaryen
Championship Contender
1)I admit, I don't even like the noun Optimism, although the Latin Optimus/Optima/Optimum seem to be a pretty good triplet of masculine/feminine/neuter adjectives.
2)No less than four threads on Roman Reigns have sprung up in the last 48 hours. Most IWC members seem to be experiencing profound revulsion considering how Roman Reigns won the title, and pretty much everything concerning him.
3)Most of us had been in concord as to why Roman Reigns sucks as a wrestler and a persona, and nothing seems to have hindered our agreement, until this Raw.
4)Yes, Reigns won. Yes, he's the champion. But why be so negative about it when there's nothing we can do about? I for one, seem to think that he doesn't sound that awkward on the mic anymore. He hasn't bedazzled me by his in-ring prowess and I doubt he'll be doing that anytime soon, not for a prolonged period anyway.
5)Reigns is as good in the ring as Ambrose. He isn't as bad as Cena. I have hated John Cena with a passion for years, notwithstanding the fact of him never losing the title or a match and his superman character. I never liked the way he wrestles, basically his entire moveset- the 5 knuckle absurdity, the AA, the shoulder-knockdown. Even his rapper gimmick and hustle loyalty respect/never back down schtick bored me to death. And after all these years, he's still the same guy. But I think Reigns' moves are still less annoying than 5-knuckle shuffle and that backdrop Cena does.
6) Yet most of you seem to curse him and label him as "bad, or worse". I think he has a set of moves, just like Cena or Batista did. Whether you find them likable or not is entirely up to you. But the moves will never change. He'll never wrestle like a Seth Rollins, Shawn Michaels, or a Daniel Bryan. Naturally, he'll only be who he has been and is, and maybe improve a little, but that's it. Why not revel a little in the victory/title reign of a wrestler who doesn't happen to be a wrestling genius?
7)At least Sheamus isn't champion. We won't really have to endure LON much anymore. (And if the news of Barrett being injured/out is correct, a big yay). If for nothing else, I think we should embrace a little bit of hope owing to LON's demise. And Kevin Owens is still around. The IC title picture hasn't seemed so glorious to me since the Jericho-RVD-Christian feud.
8)And yes, Roman Reigns looks awesome as WWE WHC. Far more awesome(IMO) than John Cena and Hulk baldy Hogan(during his prime) anyway.
2)No less than four threads on Roman Reigns have sprung up in the last 48 hours. Most IWC members seem to be experiencing profound revulsion considering how Roman Reigns won the title, and pretty much everything concerning him.
3)Most of us had been in concord as to why Roman Reigns sucks as a wrestler and a persona, and nothing seems to have hindered our agreement, until this Raw.
4)Yes, Reigns won. Yes, he's the champion. But why be so negative about it when there's nothing we can do about? I for one, seem to think that he doesn't sound that awkward on the mic anymore. He hasn't bedazzled me by his in-ring prowess and I doubt he'll be doing that anytime soon, not for a prolonged period anyway.
5)Reigns is as good in the ring as Ambrose. He isn't as bad as Cena. I have hated John Cena with a passion for years, notwithstanding the fact of him never losing the title or a match and his superman character. I never liked the way he wrestles, basically his entire moveset- the 5 knuckle absurdity, the AA, the shoulder-knockdown. Even his rapper gimmick and hustle loyalty respect/never back down schtick bored me to death. And after all these years, he's still the same guy. But I think Reigns' moves are still less annoying than 5-knuckle shuffle and that backdrop Cena does.
6) Yet most of you seem to curse him and label him as "bad, or worse". I think he has a set of moves, just like Cena or Batista did. Whether you find them likable or not is entirely up to you. But the moves will never change. He'll never wrestle like a Seth Rollins, Shawn Michaels, or a Daniel Bryan. Naturally, he'll only be who he has been and is, and maybe improve a little, but that's it. Why not revel a little in the victory/title reign of a wrestler who doesn't happen to be a wrestling genius?
7)At least Sheamus isn't champion. We won't really have to endure LON much anymore. (And if the news of Barrett being injured/out is correct, a big yay). If for nothing else, I think we should embrace a little bit of hope owing to LON's demise. And Kevin Owens is still around. The IC title picture hasn't seemed so glorious to me since the Jericho-RVD-Christian feud.
8)And yes, Roman Reigns looks awesome as WWE WHC. Far more awesome(IMO) than John Cena and Hulk baldy Hogan(during his prime) anyway.