I have to say that Habs is wrong and LetEmKnow is right this time. With Impact averaging a 1.0 and Superstars averaging a 0.74 (thank you gerweck.net), I have to think that there are some wrestleheads watching both shows, marking out from 8 til Midnight every Thursday. Make them choose, and some of them will choose Superstars on any given week.
OK, first of all, the highlighted segment of the post above is near blasphemy. To suggest that LetEmKnow could be correct about something while I'm incorrect, come on, now, that's crazy talk
.
So it would appear that this was all much ado about nothing, that it is only the replay of Superstars which is being moved. This now shifts to a hypothetical discussion only.
If iMPACT and Superstars were to go head-to-head, in their current formats, neither show would affect the other to any significant degree. TNA would have its tiny staple of dedicated smarky fans, guys who would never be enticed away by Superstars. iMPACT would plod along as is, under-achieving to the tune of about 1.0-1.2. Superstars would have even fewer viewers, because it is, after all, the D-show. Those who watch it now would still continue to watch; if they haven't been lured away by iMPACT to this point, they likely wouldn't be now either.
Now if WWE got serious and put some thought, some energy, and some focus into Superstars, and then went head-to-head with iMPACT, that could be catastrophic to TNA. And with a potential catastrophe looming with the potential let-down of the arrival of "them," another nail in the coffin of this nature would be the last thing TNA would need.