Midnite Express 2009
Getting Noticed By Management
By all accounts, Sheamus is going to headline this year's WrestleMania (unless he loses the title at the Elimination Chamber Pay-Per-Vew). There are a few things that disturb me about this. 1st of all, Sheamus looks weak. Despite his size, he's constantly being made to look like a champion who has to rely on silly DQ rules in order to retain his title. He beat Cena in a match that well, made him look weak in getting the rub, and ever since, he's pretty much had squash matches against the WWE's mid-carders while barely hanging onto his title against top contenders like Cena or Randy Orton.
Also, will having him in the main event dilute the pay-per-view itself? IMO there are serveral others who I feel should be in that spot BECAUSE the fans would appreciate it much more. Seeing Sheamus main event is almost a directly slap in the face to the dozens of great Mania main events from the past. We all know he'd lose the title anyway, so why give us something that's predictable in the first place? Why not a title match that's if not epic, enjoyable to watch? I know last year's main event was a let down to a certain degree, so why not TRY to make right by the HHH vs. Randy Orton match by giving the fans something worth watching (i.e. the Shawn Michaels vs. Undertaker match from last year).
This is my 1st post so I hope I get some feedback. I LOVE the way the WWE is keeping this interesting, BUT I certainly would not pay to see Sheamus main event a WrestleMaina. A few pay-per-views here and there was great, BUT NOT Mania, sorry.
So my question is, if not Sheamus, then who? Who should be the person going into Mania with the WWE title, or will it actually be Sheamus afterall? And does anyone find it perfectly fine or do they think this is way too much, too soon?
Also, will having him in the main event dilute the pay-per-view itself? IMO there are serveral others who I feel should be in that spot BECAUSE the fans would appreciate it much more. Seeing Sheamus main event is almost a directly slap in the face to the dozens of great Mania main events from the past. We all know he'd lose the title anyway, so why give us something that's predictable in the first place? Why not a title match that's if not epic, enjoyable to watch? I know last year's main event was a let down to a certain degree, so why not TRY to make right by the HHH vs. Randy Orton match by giving the fans something worth watching (i.e. the Shawn Michaels vs. Undertaker match from last year).
This is my 1st post so I hope I get some feedback. I LOVE the way the WWE is keeping this interesting, BUT I certainly would not pay to see Sheamus main event a WrestleMaina. A few pay-per-views here and there was great, BUT NOT Mania, sorry.
So my question is, if not Sheamus, then who? Who should be the person going into Mania with the WWE title, or will it actually be Sheamus afterall? And does anyone find it perfectly fine or do they think this is way too much, too soon?