If I were spam mod...

[Coco]

http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showthread.php?t=194058
http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showthread.php?t=194701
http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showthread.php?t=194703
http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showthread.php?t=194704

I'd merge those threads.

 

[The Crock]

Fuck, you win. What a forward thinker.

 

[FunKay the Inevitable]

Truly you are the Sosuke Aizen of this forum Coco...

 

[Coco]

I'd also protect us from invasion of chumps like this:

http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showpost.php?p=3554654&postcount=1923

WrestleZone deserves a bot who doesn't appeal to the lower class exclusively. The rich and poor alike deserve bots appealing to their taste.

 

[Coco]

http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showthread.php?t=194058
http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showthread.php?t=194701
http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showthread.php?t=194703
http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showthread.php?t=194704

I'd merge those threads.

Add this to the list:

http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showthread.php?p=3554876

 

[¡Roján!]

Fuck mod, Coco for God.

 

[Slyfox696]

If I were spam mod, I'd consider handing out an Infraction for Duplicate Topics...

 

[ScreaminNormanSmiley]

http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showthread.php?t=188108
http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showthread.php?t=157803

Would you merge the top thread with the bottom thread? It is another prime example of the unnecessary duplicate topics that are running wild in the spam zones. And they say we don't need a spam mod. I can also assume that the original would be granted keeping it's name.

 

[Coco]

If I were the recipient of such an infraction, I'd get into a long PM interaction with the spam mod about how those were all distinct topics worthy of independent existence. I trust the spam mod would take that under serious consideration.

 

[Coco]

http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showthread.php?t=188108
http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showthread.php?t=157803

Would you merge the top thread with the bottom thread? It is another prime example of the unnecessary duplicate topics that are running wild in the spam zones. And they say we don't need a spam mod. I can also assume that the original would be granted keeping it's name.

Correct on all counts.

 

[Slyfox696]

If I were the recipient of such an infraction, I'd get into a long PM interaction with the spam mod about how those were all distinct topics worthy of independent existence. I trust the spam mod would take that under serious consideration.

My bet is he wouldn't be convinced.

 

[Harthan]

It's nice that you're making the case for why you shouldn't be a mod for all of us.

 

[Coco]

What a cunt. Possibly a virgin and a Nazi to boot.

 

[a0161613]

If I were the recipient of such an infraction, I'd get into a long PM interaction with the spam mod about how those were all distinct topics worthy of independent existence. I trust the spam mod would take that under serious consideration.

They would but the infraction still stand.

 

[Coco]

I hope the spam section I get to moderate is WZCW Backstage.

 

[a0161613]

It's a tough job but somebody has to do it (and four people already do it so....)

 

[shattered dreams]

Would you re-sticky the lolwwe thread? Or does that conspiracy run up to a higher level?

 

[D-Man]

Sounds like lyrics to a song...

"If I were the spam mod... la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la... See, I'd have all the spamming in the world, if I was a spamming mooooooooooooooooood..."

 

[¡Roján!]

Didn't know D-Man was a pirate.