Fire Marshall Bill
Let me show ya somethin!!!
Since the deal with Theo Epstein is all but finalized and Jed Hoyer is coming along with him to help run the Chicago Cubs, I figured now would be a good time to speculate since they both won 2 World Series' with the Boston Red Sox.
Every baseball fan knows how bad the Cubs have been for a long time. They haven't won a World Series since 1908. They haven't even won a pennant since 1945. They're such losers in fact, they've actually become the "loveable losers" type in sports. Most Cubs fans, to include myself, have become so used to losing that it doesn't phase us anymore. No matter how good of a season we have, it's really only a matter of time. Take a look at the 1969 Chicago Cubs season if you want a great example. Maybe the best second place team of all time. A team stacked full of Hall of Famers. At one point in August they were 9 games ahead of the New York Mets in the standings. They ultimately lost 17 out of their last 25 games while the Mets went on a major streak and won the division handily. In 2008, oddly exactly 100 years after their last World Series victory, the Cubs had a stellar season and finished with 97 wins. They were swept 3-0 in their first playoff series.
Some people say they're cursed. There's the goat curse of the 1945 World Series, the last time the Cubs ever made it that far. Others could just simply put it as bad luck. Look at the Steve Bartman incident... Has anyone seen that guy since?
What I'm saying is the Cubs are obviously in an extremely bad way, to put it very mildly. Even worse than the Boston Red Sox drought of 86 years, which is no small feat by any means. Boston has had their share of bad luck (who can forget the Bill Buckner incident?). At least they can say they had been to the World Series much more recently than the Cubs even if they lost.
What I'm saying is, having broken the Boston Red Sox curse/drought/bad luck/whatever you wanna call it - and then going even further and winning ANOTHER World Series together - how big would it be for them to ALSO get the Chicago Cubs their first World Series Championship in now over 100 years?
I would think that would be absolutely huge. I'm talking like instant Hall of Fame huge. Whoever finally breaks the Chicago Cubs' World Series win drought is going to be big no matter what. But to say you've broken not only the Cubs' drought but ALSO the Red Sox's would be amazing. I'm not trying to get my hopes up as I've already explained that it's only a matter of time before we lose, but theorizing, how big would that even be in comparison to major moments in other sports?
Anyways, since I'm a Cubs fan and can be biased, what do you guys think?
How major would it be for Theo Epstein and Jed Hoyer to pull it off with the Red Sox and also the Cubs?
Is it Hall of Fame worthy?
Where would you rank it in terms of major sports milestones?
Every baseball fan knows how bad the Cubs have been for a long time. They haven't won a World Series since 1908. They haven't even won a pennant since 1945. They're such losers in fact, they've actually become the "loveable losers" type in sports. Most Cubs fans, to include myself, have become so used to losing that it doesn't phase us anymore. No matter how good of a season we have, it's really only a matter of time. Take a look at the 1969 Chicago Cubs season if you want a great example. Maybe the best second place team of all time. A team stacked full of Hall of Famers. At one point in August they were 9 games ahead of the New York Mets in the standings. They ultimately lost 17 out of their last 25 games while the Mets went on a major streak and won the division handily. In 2008, oddly exactly 100 years after their last World Series victory, the Cubs had a stellar season and finished with 97 wins. They were swept 3-0 in their first playoff series.
Some people say they're cursed. There's the goat curse of the 1945 World Series, the last time the Cubs ever made it that far. Others could just simply put it as bad luck. Look at the Steve Bartman incident... Has anyone seen that guy since?
What I'm saying is the Cubs are obviously in an extremely bad way, to put it very mildly. Even worse than the Boston Red Sox drought of 86 years, which is no small feat by any means. Boston has had their share of bad luck (who can forget the Bill Buckner incident?). At least they can say they had been to the World Series much more recently than the Cubs even if they lost.
What I'm saying is, having broken the Boston Red Sox curse/drought/bad luck/whatever you wanna call it - and then going even further and winning ANOTHER World Series together - how big would it be for them to ALSO get the Chicago Cubs their first World Series Championship in now over 100 years?
I would think that would be absolutely huge. I'm talking like instant Hall of Fame huge. Whoever finally breaks the Chicago Cubs' World Series win drought is going to be big no matter what. But to say you've broken not only the Cubs' drought but ALSO the Red Sox's would be amazing. I'm not trying to get my hopes up as I've already explained that it's only a matter of time before we lose, but theorizing, how big would that even be in comparison to major moments in other sports?
Anyways, since I'm a Cubs fan and can be biased, what do you guys think?
How major would it be for Theo Epstein and Jed Hoyer to pull it off with the Red Sox and also the Cubs?
Is it Hall of Fame worthy?
Where would you rank it in terms of major sports milestones?