I know a lot has been said about Jinder Mahal, but I've never really seen him. I don't watch Superstars and I rarely see Smackdown, so what little bit of him I have seen, it's been on Raw where he jobs to Sheamus or Santino and it's been in small increments.
I just watched his Superstars match from this week against Tyson Kidd on Hulu, and I couldn't help but notice that the crowd is so quiet, especially considering that this is a heel who actually gets used on TV. I just couldn't help but wonder, "What appeal is there to this guy?"
Jinder Mahal has a good look, but so do a lot of people. I think a lot of getting your foot in the WWE door these days is all about having a good look, at least in your own right. In his own way, Punk looks cool in the ring.
If all the WWE wants is a foothold in India, why wouldn't they just stick with Khali? Don't get me wrong, I know Khali had his personal problems and that he's an awful performer to watch, but he's arguably the most famous Indian wrestler, ever. At least, I can't think of anyone else. There have been plenty of Arab wrestlers, but I can't think of many more Indian wrestlers. If all you want is an Indian name on your roster, why not stick with the guy who has been a world champion in your company and already has name value?
Jinder Mahal's matches, when he actually gets offense in, aren't bad at all. He's a generic heel, though he's not that bad at it. Still, I'll take one guy with a unique gimmick over one with a generic gimmick, any day. Jinder Mahal has money and therefore is in the upper-echelon of the Indian caste system, which is just a translated version of any other rich heel gimmick. Also, for the WWE to base a character on that one piece on Indian culture shows a lack of understanding of the Indian culture; the caste system is an outdated concept that most Indians don't really take seriously, anymore. I'm not trying to stand on a soap box about this, it's just that if you're going to make a character that's meant to appeal to a certain demographic, then make sure you demonstrate an understanding of that demographic before you do.
But, I guess that's my whole point: I can't see any reason for the WWE to put Mahal in the position he's in. So many young faces on the WWE roster are fighting like crazy for a spot on TV and Mahal basically just walks on and gets relatively mid-card air time? All just because he's Indian? That's not good booking. If you're trying to hook the Indian audience, why, "represent them," with a heel character that negatively stereotypes them and their culture? Wouldn't you want the Indian audience to cheer for John Cena in that situation, anyway?
So tell me: do you think there's any appeal to Jinder Mahal?
Do you ever see this guy getting cared about?
I think there might be potential there, despite how uncomfortable he seems on camera. I don't get why the WWE is using him in this context, though;I don't think he's doing anything now that Drew McIntyre couldn't have done better.
P.S.
I did a search to see if this thread was already active, and I didn't see a similar one. I apologize if this has been discussed ad nauseam, though.
P.P.S
I highlight the words I've already put in bold because people on the Internet already skim and scan your comments enough, so the least I can do is basically just spare you the minor details, unless you would like otherwise, and tell you how I feel plainly. If it offends the eye, then give me feedback and I'll quit.
I just watched his Superstars match from this week against Tyson Kidd on Hulu, and I couldn't help but notice that the crowd is so quiet, especially considering that this is a heel who actually gets used on TV. I just couldn't help but wonder, "What appeal is there to this guy?"
Jinder Mahal has a good look, but so do a lot of people. I think a lot of getting your foot in the WWE door these days is all about having a good look, at least in your own right. In his own way, Punk looks cool in the ring.
If all the WWE wants is a foothold in India, why wouldn't they just stick with Khali? Don't get me wrong, I know Khali had his personal problems and that he's an awful performer to watch, but he's arguably the most famous Indian wrestler, ever. At least, I can't think of anyone else. There have been plenty of Arab wrestlers, but I can't think of many more Indian wrestlers. If all you want is an Indian name on your roster, why not stick with the guy who has been a world champion in your company and already has name value?
Jinder Mahal's matches, when he actually gets offense in, aren't bad at all. He's a generic heel, though he's not that bad at it. Still, I'll take one guy with a unique gimmick over one with a generic gimmick, any day. Jinder Mahal has money and therefore is in the upper-echelon of the Indian caste system, which is just a translated version of any other rich heel gimmick. Also, for the WWE to base a character on that one piece on Indian culture shows a lack of understanding of the Indian culture; the caste system is an outdated concept that most Indians don't really take seriously, anymore. I'm not trying to stand on a soap box about this, it's just that if you're going to make a character that's meant to appeal to a certain demographic, then make sure you demonstrate an understanding of that demographic before you do.
But, I guess that's my whole point: I can't see any reason for the WWE to put Mahal in the position he's in. So many young faces on the WWE roster are fighting like crazy for a spot on TV and Mahal basically just walks on and gets relatively mid-card air time? All just because he's Indian? That's not good booking. If you're trying to hook the Indian audience, why, "represent them," with a heel character that negatively stereotypes them and their culture? Wouldn't you want the Indian audience to cheer for John Cena in that situation, anyway?
So tell me: do you think there's any appeal to Jinder Mahal?
Do you ever see this guy getting cared about?
I think there might be potential there, despite how uncomfortable he seems on camera. I don't get why the WWE is using him in this context, though;I don't think he's doing anything now that Drew McIntyre couldn't have done better.
P.S.
I did a search to see if this thread was already active, and I didn't see a similar one. I apologize if this has been discussed ad nauseam, though.
P.P.S
I highlight the words I've already put in bold because people on the Internet already skim and scan your comments enough, so the least I can do is basically just spare you the minor details, unless you would like otherwise, and tell you how I feel plainly. If it offends the eye, then give me feedback and I'll quit.