HUGE Flaw in the Vicki Guerrero Storyline...

amodernphoenix

Occasional Pre-Show
Vicki Guerrero being the General Manager of Raw is fine, but this business of her making matches with the McMahons is ridiculous. Remember her crazy stipulation with the title in the McMahon/HHH match against Legacy? Tonight they did it again by having her make a match between Shane and Orton after Shane interferred in Orton's match.

Are we supposed to completely forget that Vince is the 'Chairman of the Boad and CEO' or that Shane is his son? Do the WWE writers really expect us to suspend belief so far that we could believe Vicki outranks the Chairman with matters like match rules? How about the fact that they brought her in to replace Stephanie as Raw GM, yet she is somehow in control of Shane?

Why isn't Shane running the show? It just doesn't make sense and it's this kind of sloppy writing that is driving WWE down the tube. It's bad enough that the wrestlers aren't given long programs or adequate time in the ring to tell a good story, but now they are also cutting back on the quality of the theatrical parts of the show?

The WWE needs to seriously consider hiring more former stars to help with the booking. Hollywood writers know nothing about wrestling or the mentality behind it and that shows.
 
Yes, you are supposed to believe that. As ridiculous as it is, this is the way WWE wants us to think. The company continues to insult our intelligence on a weekly basis and this is no exception. Vince seems to think that we know nothing at all about wrestling or even common sense, and I'd like to think that there are more intelligent people in the world than the people that WWE hopes they are fooling with this.
 
I think its crazy if vince had any common sense he should have kept her on smackdown with her husband edge, but she went to raw and raw drafted the big ape lover of vicky. I mean maybe it makes sense cause vince is suposed to trust his gms but when she puts stipulaitons on his son in law and puts his son in a match it starts to confuse a smart viewer . But if the wwe is gearing toward kids so things do not have to make any sense do they ?
 
Until you've been to a show, you have no idea how much heat Vickie draws. I can promise you, you underestimate it. When I saw SD!, I thought I was prepared, but the boos and screams were deafening. They need that kind of energy on Raw. SD! can be edited to make things better than they are. On a live show, you need the people who garner the biggest reaction. Vickie had to go.

SD!, however, is Edge's show, so he needed to stay. And besides, breaking them apart isn't that bad. Edge has to make it on his own. He might make some guest appearances on Raw, which can only help the quality of that show. Plus, this can be the event that hastens the end of the brand split.

JR mentioned on his blog that he was happy about the brands being split. JR has never mentoned this before, so I can only surmise that they won't stay split.
 
Uh, if you recall the "Board of Directors" made her the GM of raw. The "Board of Directors" outranks the CEO and the Chairman...so in fact making her powerful enough to book a match with Shane...

But this still doesn't replace the fact that Vicky sucks...Does anyone else miss The Coach?
 
Alright, lets see if I can explain this, as in past storylines, Vince is the Chairman, He made the 6 man match at Backlash, Vickie is the GM and not only can she make matches between any person with a talent contract, which as of past storylines includes the McMahon family. Vickie as the GM can add stipulations to matches so she added the title and the dq count out stips to the match. Shane is currently wrestling on the RAW brand making him a contract talent of RAW so the RAW GM can book him in a match.
 
You people assume that it wasn't Shane or Vince who wanted the match. Keep in mind it was only 2 weeks ago that Shane was fighting for the chance to get Orton one on one.
 
no offense but if that bit of bad writing was the first time they truely offended you during this feud then their writing style is slowly taking over your brain seek help.... now onto the main focus here yes yes vicki is now GM sure I can deal with it why not shes a top heel god bless her and the rules thing makes sense and the story kind of plays like this with Shane in a "real life" situation he just assaulted randy tonight thats jail so instead of pressing charges against the son of the chairmen vicki simply makes a match between the two on raw yet again for them to work out their issues. OH MY GOD JR THAT WAS AWEFUL BOOKING!!!!!! we just saw that match at a pay per view and a raw sooo wtf ok lets roll with it even if you can go beyond the stupidity behind this feuds booking lets go back and look at what its based off of. they are using the past 5 years a lot of intense interaction yet they had randy botch the entire storyline in ONE promo he killed all the heat for it.. "eleminating HHH so that he could go on to face HHH for the wwe title at mania really how the fuck o,O" I've written better wrestling storylines in my sleep! They had the raw material for a GREAT feud too bad they took what should have been an epic storyline shit on it mixed it all up in a blinder and tried to shove it down our throats, passing it off as a chocolate milkshake.. Seriously I believe its to screw with orton as they keep doing these REALLY stupid storylines that make no sense with him. I think they need a few new bookers and a lot of new writers or at least someone to proof read what they write as its getting beyond the term ass backwards! :crucified:
 
The reason they do this is because if they just made all the matches they want,,,, always putting things in their favor or their son in laws favor, it would make them ,,,,,,,,,, and HHH look like heels. ( which is funny, because that exactly what happens all the time in real life.) It would also make Orton a Face, which I am still not sure if he could pull that off 100 %
 
I must say that I am amused by the few in the thread that try to justify the logic of Vickie in out-ranking the McMahons.

The bottom line is that Vince McMahon is wrestling. There is absolutely no "Board of Directors" of a wrestling/sports entertainment company that is going to entrust all the power of being Raw General Manager to Vickie Guerrero over Vince McMahon or his children. So the fact that people try to pass it onto the "Board of Directors" and them "outranking" even the Chairman of the Board, is a load of horse crap.

How many years of business experience does Vince McMahon have? Between 30 and 40? Furthermore, he has been Chairman of the Board and Owner of this company. How many years of kayfabe business experience does Vickie have? About 3 or so as a GM of another show? And the Board of Directors is going to over-rule Vince McMahon in favor of Vickie Guerrero? Bullshit.

So I am with the majority. The logical sense in all of this is a complete load of crap and insulting to the viewers' intelligence. I don't care how much heat she draws, it is piss poor storywriting.

Now, if a Heel McMahon would have physically placed her in charge of the show, then it makes much more sense and would be perfectly understandable. However, current circumstances did not allow for that to happen, and therefore the whole thing comes across as poor in which the McMahons, of all people, are powerless to do anything against Vickie Guerrero, of all people.
 
Took long enough for someone to notice. Truth is, logic is an alien element in most WWE storylines, explain DiBiase joining Orton after getting punted by him or Rhodes joining after Orton punted his dad without pulling straws out of a hat and you begin to see that it's not just the Vicky as GM that lacks realism. This isn't a WWE only thing either, if you looked at TNA, you know what I mean. I don't exactly know what the wrestling business calls "writers" because I've seen better angles written by amateurs on forums like this one, but unless they get serious and actually hire some real writers, things will stay the way they are, alien to logic.
 
im not sure im following you in this post, the title of it is about a flaw in the Vicky Guerrero story line.... yet i fail to see any mention of it besides the fact that you think she shouldn't be GM, but i think the exact opposite... she makes a good GM... why?.. because people hate her... and the wrestlers cant lay a hand on here... note: Eric Bischoff everyone hated him... but he played a coward kinda guy... cant have a heel GM unless he's a 10 Foot monster because he will always be bullied by the other heels... and intimated by the baby faces, there for... only way a GM can work if you don't want them to have this kind of image is... A) woman b) babyface e.g. Teddy Long.

and the Teddy and Cody stuff.... simple... Orton was putting them through initiations to see if they had what it takes to be in his group... that was all explained on TV... while they were doing the story line where priceless were getting slapped around by Orton for a month or so, and yes randy slapped dusty about but that's part of the whole thing... Cody wants to be better then his father he wants to step out of his shadow and become better... note: promo backstage with Cody and Dustin when he said he doesn't give a shit about dusty's DVD... and he'll give them both a call when the Cody Rhodes DVD comes out.
 
I must say that I am amused by the few in the thread that try to justify the logic of Vickie in out-ranking the McMahons.

The bottom line is that Vince McMahon is wrestling. There is absolutely no "Board of Directors" of a wrestling/sports entertainment company that is going to entrust all the power of being Raw General Manager to Vickie Guerrero over Vince McMahon or his children. So the fact that people try to pass it onto the "Board of Directors" and them "outranking" even the Chairman of the Board, is a load of horse crap.

How many years of business experience does Vince McMahon have? Between 30 and 40? Furthermore, he has been Chairman of the Board and Owner of this company. How many years of kayfabe business experience does Vickie have? About 3 or so as a GM of another show? And the Board of Directors is going to over-rule Vince McMahon in favor of Vickie Guerrero? Bullshit.

So I am with the majority. The logical sense in all of this is a complete load of crap and insulting to the viewers' intelligence. I don't care how much heat she draws, it is piss poor storywriting.

Now, if a Heel McMahon would have physically placed her in charge of the show, then it makes much more sense and would be perfectly understandable. However, current circumstances did not allow for that to happen, and therefore the whole thing comes across as poor in which the McMahons, of all people, are powerless to do anything against Vickie Guerrero, of all people.
You make a good point...allow me to counter that point.

Lewis Wolff owns the Oakland Athletics. Billy Beane is the General Manager. Now, who makes the decisions regarding on-field talent and the manager? Billy Beane does, not the owner. Bob Geren is the team manager. Who makes the decision of who gets to start and who sits the bench? Is it Wolff? No, Bob Geren does.

So, just because one owns the team, that doesn't mean that they always run the team. And just because Vince McMahon owns the WWE, that doesn't mean he will always run it. Oh, and let's not forget that Vince STILL makes matches when he feels like it (for example, the Backlash match with Legacy vs. McMahons, and then Batista), so it's not like he is completely powerless either.

So, there. You now have your illogical storyline proven logical.
 
Shane could veto her (kayfabe) but of course he wanted this match, so no conflict there. Hell, he (kayfabe) probably told her to set up him v. Orton. Or as Vickie says 'Or-uhn'
 
LOL, this is the same thing I said about TNA last week, when Foley put the TNA Founder and "on-screen owner" in a match. IMO, that didnt make sense. Jarret is suppose to be the most powerful man in TNA, and Foley is putting him in matches. WTF? And now they are doing the same stuff with Vickie putting the McMahons in matches. LOL, this makes as much sense as a fat person being in a marathon.
 
Uh, if you recall the "Board of Directors" made her the GM of raw. The "Board of Directors" outranks the CEO and the Chairman...so in fact making her powerful enough to book a match with Shane...

But this still doesn't replace the fact that Vicky sucks...Does anyone else miss The Coach?

let me explain the board of directors its four members and there names are Vince,Linda,Shane, and Stephanie thats it thats all. There no way in hell anybody has a voice or decision over a McMahon except Triple H oh wait he's part McMahon. The first time it happen I looked at my wife and you have to shitting me if they want us to think Vicky is more powerful than Shane.
 
....this is hurting my brain.

Your arguing over the logic of a wrestling storyline. Let's not forget the fact that in MMA punches and kicks are lethal and knock people out but in wrestling they don't (unless your big show)

Dude, don't try and argue logic in wrestling it's just silly.
 
Why not just think of it like this? The Board of Directors made her the GM of Raw, now Vince runs WWE which controls RAW, Smackdown, ECW, and Superstars. As well as all their developmental territories. Personally, I'd give the GM the full control over said show, and wouldn't interfere unless I felt it absolutely necessary, and I wouldn't do it alone. So in my view, she does have last say over RAW UNLESS Vince and other's have reason to remove her and put someone else. Does that make much sense? He has more to do then worry about RAW only.
 
Wrestling is a work there have always been things that doesn't make sense. Thats wrestling if everything made sense it wouldn't work. Yea in real life Vicki wouldn't be able to do the sit she does but it gets her heat and it makes Raw more interesting.

There have been plenty of past wrestling storylines that don't make sense in real life. Bossman dragged the coffin of big shows dad around and didnt get arrested. There have been custody battles determined by a ladder match. Hell if we are going to take everything seriously then we must believe that a 6'10 man is undead and has supernatural powers.

Yes it doesn't make sense but thats wrestling its meant to entertain, not meant to make complete sense.
 
No its not a 'HUGE flaw' actually, every GM or Commish has had the ability to make their own matches and go above Vince's head in certain cases. Any of you people crying about this so-called flaw remember the days of Shawn Michaels as commissioner making matches to piss Vince off while Vince was standing in the ring, knowing he couldn't do anything about it?

Didn't think so.
 
you know, vickie didn't annoy me on raw last night nearly as much as she usually does. maybe it's her cutting out the "excuse me" bit. or her voice didn't sound nearly as awful, or maybe she pronounced orton's name right once i think, or perhaps she's starting to grow on me as she is for many others. meh, who knows, doesn't take much for things to get fucked up in wwe. also, did anyone notice cody's lack of lisp last night? or the fact that he's a little bigger every time we see him. at least that's what it looks like to me. if i'm wrong, bash me and call me a schmuck. haha. i kinda like that vickie has "the power" seeing as how she's on orton and legacy's side. orton and vickie are the top heels, and them co-existing can be dangerous for everyone else. and now, i get my wish and get to see shane wrestle again. seriously, he surprises me whenever he's in the ring. always pulls some more technical shit. do i see a flaw in the storyline? not at the moment. before backlash they screwed it up big time. and i think now they're trying to get things rolling in a different direction. that's the problem with wwe and their story telling. they always want to do one thing, and in the middle when it's getting good, they change shit around and fuck it all up. let's just hope they remain consistent on this road.....for once!
 
No its not a 'HUGE flaw' actually, every GM or Commish has had the ability to make their own matches and go above Vince's head in certain cases. Any of you people crying about this so-called flaw remember the days of Shawn Michaels as commissioner making matches to piss Vince off while Vince was standing in the ring, knowing he couldn't do anything about it?

Didn't think so.

Actually, I do remember that. And I was knocking that same thing, as well, because I thought it was ridiculous, too. For all of the same reasons stated with Vickie outranking a McMahon.

you know, vickie didn't annoy me on raw last night nearly as much as she usually does. maybe it's her cutting out the "excuse me" bit. or her voice didn't sound nearly as awful

I do agree that Vickie last night was more tolerable than she usually is. I think getting her out of the "Excuse Me's" every single week is a step in the right direction.

Also, her not mentioning "her husband, Edge" in every promo is another step in the right direction.

that's the problem with wwe and their story telling. they always want to do one thing, and in the middle when it's getting good, they change shit around and fuck it all up.

That has happened time and time again in WWE and I don't understand it. Obviously, most recently with what they did with Orton in taking away the IED and reverting him back to a typical Heel.
 
the wwe think all its viewers are idiots. another example after wrestlemania jericho had a bruise from rouke a what 200 pound man yet the K-O blow from a "500 pound monster" or the best pure striker in the company never leave a bruise
 
This is Jim Cornette's latest blog From his website

(I can't count the number of times over the last 10 years that someone, usually not connected to professional wrestling in any way except as a fan, has asked me, "How do I get a job as a writer?" or given me a package of "scripts" as an audition for a "writing position". This usually gives me the sour belches. It's not these folks' fault that they want the position, it's the fault of the idiots who actually HIRE idiots like these that gives others the idea they, too, can get the jobs with no experience whatsoever. So the inaugural Cornette's Commentary deals with what a "booker" is, what a "writer" is, and the difference between the two.

The inspiration for this column was a paragraph in the Wrestling Observer Newsletter from several months back. I quote that here verbatim, as an example of the intellect of people who "write" wrestling in some places these days:

"It started with Marella and Phoenix out. Marella talked about the three perverts he might face at Cyber Sunday, two crossdressers, Rodney the Piper and Goldendust, and a third pervert in Honky Tonk Man. He called "Johnny Knockville" to the ring. He was out there plugging his website about 50 times, so it was no subtlety as to why he was there. He made a remark about Phoenix's tallywacker and implying she was a guy in drag (I mean, she doesn't exactly look like Nicole Bass or even Chyna to make that joke work), so she bodyslammed him. This was just about the worst bodyslam in history, all his fault. She gave him an extra boot out of frustration and I'm sure she was glad her time in this skit was up. Hornswoggle ran in for a tadpole splash. Then Chris Pontius, who was with him, came to the ring. Christopher DeJosephs (a WWE "writer") as Big Dick Johnson then showed up, peeled off his clothes and started dancing. Pontius then peeled off his clothes, so you had two guys running around in jock straps dancing. I'd hate to think who this was trying to appeal to at this point. But we weren't done. Out came the Boogeyman.. DeJosephs ran away, but Boogeyman gave Pontius a lousy looking clothesline and spit worms all over his face. Almost none went in Pontius' mouth, but one or two may have and they were selling it like a ton did. But we STILL weren't done. Knoxville got up and said he'd been blown up before, and finally since this was all building to it, out came Khali. They started laughing and Khali gave Knoxville the head squeeze, picked him up and dropped him with a slam from the head squeeze. There have been mercy killings less painful than this segment. Houston Mitchell of the Los Angeles Times, there live, said "I've never seen a segment die live quite as bad as that Jackass segment did. And it seemed to go on forever." There were people internally quietly saying the segment was awful, and Brian Gewirtz (WWE "writer") was very defensive of it, saying those people just don't understand good comedy."

Apparently that stupid son of a bitch Gewirtz doesn't understand good WRESTLING, either.

Let's clarify our terms at the start. Pro wrestling doesn't have "writers", it has a BOOKER. "Sports entertainment" has "writers". Since Toots Mondt laid the groundwork for the position of booker back in the 20's and 30's, the booker in wrestling served as the matchmaker, deciding who would wrestle who, who would win, constructed the finishes to lead to rematches if applicable, and set up the "programs", or series of matches between two opponents. He determined the talent roster by hiring and/or firing the wrestlers who wrestled in the particular territory he was booking. As the TV era began, the booker also laid out the TV formats, came up with the angles to be worked, and gave the talent ideas for what to say in their promos.

The promoter, or owner, of the territory the booker was in charge of was the only person the booker answered to. He might have assistants to carry out his instructions, but he had sole control over any decisions relating to talent. If business was good, he stayed in the position. If business was bad, the promoter replaced him. The wrestlers, especially the main event talent, had great leeway in their performance as long as they carried out the booker's basic instructions. The booker gave the finish and any important spot, the rest of the match was up to the talent. The booker told the talent the subject and time of their TV promos, content and delivery was up to talent. As an example, Dusty Rhodes' instructions to me might be, "You've got 3 minutes, you're wrestling the Rock & Roll Express in Charlotte, last show there you interfered with the racket so this time they've asked for a cage match, and it's for the Tag Title. Go sell me some tickets."

If the talent performed the booker's angles, finishes and promos properly while getting their individual personalities and style over, they drew money. If they didn't, they were replaced with someone who did. So, in summation, a booker assembled a crew of wrestlers that he felt were unique, charismatic and talented, gave them direction and a platform on which to get over, built up their won-loss records, and then manipulated them into personal issues or title matches with other stars he felt were compelling enough that fans would pay to see them. The talent did the rest, and that's why main event stars got reputations as being able to "draw money". You often hear these days that "so and so has never drawn any money." In TODAY's environment, few particular talents "draw money", because few are put in positions to do their own thing and prove it's THEM, not the "writing", that people are paying to see.

Great talent can sometimes take mediocre booking and make it work, but it's hard for great booking to draw money with subpar talent. Being a great booker was an art form, possibly the hardest job in wrestling, because it not only required great knowledge of and experience in wrestling, but the ability to spot and feature great talent as well. Many of the greatest bookers were also top stars in the ring. The reason for this is because only a proven money-drawing talent with a track record of success and years of experience would be trusted by a promoter with the most important job in his company. In many cases, only a top star known for his accomplishments would have the respect in the eyes of the talent to be able to tell a locker room full of stars and tough guys what to do.

Of course, there was often a problem with the booker also being a wrestler, in terms of ego, overpushing himself or his friends, etc., but there was also an upside in that the booker knew he wouldn't walk out on himself, hold himself up for more money, and the like. So how did you become a booker in the "old days?" Every story is different, but the gist is the same.Unless you had some outstanding accomplishment on your resume, such as being a standout amateur champion, former pro athlete, local sports hero, or physical giant that made a promoter come to you, you generally followed a path something like this:

You were a fan of wrestling who hung around the matches, set up the ring, ran errands, etc. until your presence became accepted in the "closed society" of wrestling. An established wrestler took a liking to you and agreed to train you in the basics. After getting the crap kicked out of you in training, you started as a TV job guy or a "curtain-jerker", got beaten like a drum, losing to everyone wherever you could get booked. You suffered through long trips and low payoffs until, IF you had any talent, you began moving up the cards, and MAYBE you would get a break if you impressed someone in power, and you would get to be involved in an angle or program. If that went well, you MIGHT get booked in a decent spot somewhere else. Over a period of years, working in many different territories, IF you were really good, you MIGHT establish yourself as a top talent.

IF you showed an interest in or aptitude for the booking end of wrestling, you might begin to get input in your own programs and angles, and IF that worked well, you MIGHT be offered a spot as an assistant to an established booker who had taken an interest in you and wanted to mentor you, and if that worked out, a promoter somewhere MIGHT have enough faith in you to give you a shot as his booker. So as you can see, it was fairly easy.

In my case, I was a fan for 5 years, a photographer/ring announcer/gofer for 6 years, and a manager for 7 years before I was given an opportunity to be an assistant to WCW booker Ric Flair at the age of 28, and THAT raised eyebrows as I had so "little" experience. I also had to overcome the fact that I was not a wrestler, but "only" a manager. Still, I had been a performer, and that was the key. Not only was it almost unheard of for a person without many years of experience to be given a booking spot, but it was even rarer for someone to book if they had not been a performer of some kind.

You needed the experience of actually performing angles, finishes, promos and the like to know, through trial and error and on-the-job training how these things were laid out and implemented, how crowds would react, and how slight variations would lead to the success or failure of anything you were trying to accomplish.

Contrast the old system, where idiots like the aforementioned Gewirtz couldn't have gotten a job popping popcorn, with today. "Sports entertainment" started in the mid 80's, as a term coined by Vince McMahon to con major advertisers into thinking they were buying something other than professional wrestling, which many considered "low-class" programming. Of course, it was really still wrestling, as fans have never said, "There's sports entertainment at the Coliseum tonight", or "Did you get your sports entertainment tickets". But, especially over the last 10 years, the WWE has spearheaded major changes which have resulted in wrestling being possibly the only product of any kind where the fans, or the consumers, know more about the product than most of the people in charge of producing it.

The WWE executives and higher-ups have deluded themselves into thinking that they really AREN'T in the wrestling business, that they have created something better than "rasslin' ", as they condescendingly refer to it. Even though they owe their homes, their savings, possibly everything they own to pro wrestling, they are so ashamed of being in the business of promoting wrestling that they refuse to even call it that. Over nearly a generation of hiring new employees, most of whom don't know the true story, they have created an atmosphere in the company whereby many there genuinely believe they have created a new genre of entertainment out of something that was seedy and small time, never successful before Vince got ahold of it. Nowhere is this more prevalent as on their "creative team", which is what they optimistically call their "writers".

For years, the head of the creative team has been Stephanie McMahon, the boss' daughter. While an intelligent, college-educated woman, her credentials qualifying her to be the head "writer" of a wrestling promotion remain the three words "the boss' daughter." Her knowledge of wrestling history, especially of how her father put the territories out of business, is nil, as evidenced by her testimony before Congress. Her experience as a performer has been limited to what she wrote for herself. It's not her fault entirely, as until she came to work at the WWE after college, she attended the matches sporadically, and certainly no one was going to teach the boss' daughter anything that might be politically imprudent. Her husband, Triple H, a student of the game, is certainly not going to rock his marriage boat, and much more important to him, his position as the heir to the throne, by telling her any of the negative effects her father has had on the pro wrestling industry in general while building his personal empire.

So Stephanie, as head of creative, hires people like her.Young people with college degrees in writing, many with experience writing scripted television, comedy shows in particular, with little or no respect for wrestling, and little if any experience performing ANYTHING. As a matter of fact, being a fan of wrestling is not even a requirement for the job, and God forbid if you DO admit to being a wrestling fan, and having watched any other wrestling besides WWE, you will at best be viewed as a "mark" and your days numbered.

These sitcom writers and comic book/video game enthusiasts don't apply for WWE jobs out of a lifelong love of wrestling, they do it to add to their resumes for the day they can get jobs in "real" TV and feed their dreams of winning an Emmy. They write things to amuse themselves and/or Vince, because seemingly 80% or better of "sports entertainment" has to be funny, usually involving stripper pillow fights, fart jokes, crossdressers, fat oily guys, inside jokes only a small portion of the audience understand, and midgets. When the fans who actually watch wrestling because they like it don't enjoy this crap, they are called "smart marks", "spoiled", and mocked and made fun of for not being "with the program", because in the WWE the customer is NEVER right.

While the WWE employs some of the greatest in-ring talent of the past as agents, like Arn Anderson, Ricky Steamboat and others, not only do they not have a hand in actually writing the shows, but they know better than to ruffle feathers by giving their true opinions, so they are forced to sit in muzzled silence while one of the writers sacrifices his dignity with gusto by slathering oil on his repulsive, 300 pound frame and parades about in a G-String, taking up time that could be used to get a hardworking young wrestler over. They know that Vince and his minions love to embarass and humiliate his loyal wrestling staff on TV if they step up with a dissenting opinion. It's no wonder that Michael Hayes, the last remaining person out of the revolving door staff of "writers" who has actually BEEN a pro wrestler, has had public issues with alcohol. After watching these amateur Shakespeares barge into the front door of my profession, wipe their feet on the rug, and turn the business into a clown show resembling the Harlem Globetrotters on acid, I feel like taking up a Mexican black tar heroin habit.

In this process, all the individuality has been taken from the talent. As the RAW script which was recently leaked on the internet shows, every word, every bit of business, even every gesture is scripted and only the upper echelon of talent has the liberty of any improvisation. Wrestling has been homogenized, pasteurized, and "sanitized for your protection" like a cellophane wrapper on a toilet seat at a cheap motel. The "writers" have become so absorbed in self-aggrandizement that every page of the detailed script is headed with "You are watching the longest-running weekly episodic television show in history", as if they are on the level of Gunsmoke, Bonanza or I Love Lucy. I don't recall Marshall Dillon spouting bad jokes like a standup comic in the Poconos, or Fred Mertz giving Ricky Ricardo a piledriver.

If the material succeeds, the creative team pats itself on the back. If it fails, they blame the wrestlers, saddled with silly gimmicks and lame scripts they don't have the power to refuse, for not being able to "draw money". If stars of the past like Dick Murdoch, the Sheik, Abdullah the Butcher, or even Dusty Rhodes, were to come along today, they couldn't even get jobs in developmental because they don't fit the cookie-cutter mold of what "stars" are supposed to look like. They would sound the same as everyone else because they wouldn't have the power to "go into business for themselves" and get themselves over with their unique personalities.

The matches themselves, the very basis of how wrestling sells tickets, are minimized in importance because, from bell to bell, the matches are the one thing that's hardest for the "writers" to control. The overwritten, overproduced skits take precedent because, as the old saying goes, if the "writers" ever walked into an athlete's locker room, they'd be whistling "Stranger in Paradise." The passion and emotion has been drained from the promos, as instead of colorful personalities speaking their own words from the heart, the talent recite memorized promos handed to them in a script, so everyone sounds the same. Credibility has been sacrificed as instead of two men fighting over a championship or personal issue easily understood and believed by the viewer, they are mired into an overwritten, convoluted soap opera that is obviously contrived. Injury rates soar as people who have never been in a match come up with ridiculously complicated stipulations and gimmick-laden bouts that are impossible to perform safely, all the while knowing THEY'LL never have to risk their necks actually executing the shit.

I've made a lot of money in wrestling over the years, but I'd have a lot more if I had a dime for every time someone has recognized me in public and told me they USED to watch wrestling, but they don't anymore because it got so (pick one) A) Show biz B) Fake C) cartoony D) offensive or E) variations on A-D.

And who suffers? Besides the fans who have to sit through so much of this hokey shit to see the great matches and promos the top talent are still capable of delivering when given the chance, it's the wrestlers. The aspiring rookies are handicapped by having no territories left to gain experience in, as well as the WWE's butchering of their own developmental system. The guys who do make the main roster are forced to sacrifice their dignity and self-respect by doing the silly things that hamper their ability to get over but amuse the writers. The more physically demanding style combined with the mainstream knowledge that pro wrestling is a complete work means they now have to hit each other twice as hard to get half the response. Careers last 5 or 10 years instead of 20 or 30. I won't even go into the drug issues caused by the cosmetic look needed to fit the WWE's hiring practices or the resulting depression experienced by those who get a brief taste of stardom, then have it taken away when the gimmick or spot they are given turns out to be a short-term success with no legs and they are "typecast" in the fans' eyes and cannot reinvent themselves. Additionally, the wrestler is the one who takes the blame if he grows a set of balls one day and says, "No, the Boogeyman is NOT going to spit live worms in my mouth tonight."

Wrestling is a talent-driven industry.The stars are ultimately the ones the fans pay to see, or watch on TV. But never in our sport's history have people who have no experience and background in or respect for our industry had so much control over those who do. And that's sad, for the wrestlers AND the fans.)
 
Uh, if you recall the "Board of Directors" made her the GM of raw. The "Board of Directors" outranks the CEO and the Chairman...

No it doesn't. The Board of Directors of a publically-traded company wouldn't get involved in such decisions and the Chairman of the Board is just that, in charge of the board.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,837
Messages
3,300,747
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top