For years so many members of this forum, myself included, have been clamoring for the return of managers. The popular belief has always been a good manager could take someone that is talented in the ring but struggles on the mic and get him over. Were we all proven wrong in 2013?
Most people here seem to really like Paul Heyman and consider him to be one of the best managers ever in wrestling. In mid 2013 Heyman pulled Michael McGillicutty from obscurity and reinvented him as Curtis Axel. Axel has always been a pretty good in ring performer but doesnt offer much when it comes to charisma or mic skills. That reputation did not improve with the pairing with Paul Heyman. Axel did win the Intercontinental title but his was one of the most lackluster reigns weve ever seen. The fans were just not interested in Axel at all.
In the fall Heyman took on another guy with a lot of potential in Ryback. Many thought a good manager like Heyman was the missing ingredient that would take Ryback to the next level. It didnt happen. In fact it can easily be argued that Ryback actually regressed under Heyman. Why couldnt Heyman get these guys over?
Maybe weve been wrong all along. Maybe we dont need managers back. In the 21st century the fans arent going to care about a wrestler unless he can get over on his own. Managers can still serve a purpose. Paul Heyman was great with CM Punk. The difference was Punk was over on his own and he didnt need Heyman. He was just the icing on the cake of a great character. So while I think managers can still be useful I think the days of using a manager to singlehandedly get a struggling talent over are long gone. A year ago I would have told you different but Heyman, Axel, and Ryback have proven me wrong.
Most people here seem to really like Paul Heyman and consider him to be one of the best managers ever in wrestling. In mid 2013 Heyman pulled Michael McGillicutty from obscurity and reinvented him as Curtis Axel. Axel has always been a pretty good in ring performer but doesnt offer much when it comes to charisma or mic skills. That reputation did not improve with the pairing with Paul Heyman. Axel did win the Intercontinental title but his was one of the most lackluster reigns weve ever seen. The fans were just not interested in Axel at all.
In the fall Heyman took on another guy with a lot of potential in Ryback. Many thought a good manager like Heyman was the missing ingredient that would take Ryback to the next level. It didnt happen. In fact it can easily be argued that Ryback actually regressed under Heyman. Why couldnt Heyman get these guys over?
Maybe weve been wrong all along. Maybe we dont need managers back. In the 21st century the fans arent going to care about a wrestler unless he can get over on his own. Managers can still serve a purpose. Paul Heyman was great with CM Punk. The difference was Punk was over on his own and he didnt need Heyman. He was just the icing on the cake of a great character. So while I think managers can still be useful I think the days of using a manager to singlehandedly get a struggling talent over are long gone. A year ago I would have told you different but Heyman, Axel, and Ryback have proven me wrong.