I can tell you all one thing for certain: you are impossible to please.
A year ago you were begging for guys like Team 3D to step aside for "new blood" to finally get a push, so TNA went out and actually got you that new blood. Now you're complaining that it's too young to warrant being there?
G&M may be green, but they're young and have imposing and impressive frames to work with. Their first few matches aren't likely to accomplish much, but if you had some fuckin' patience (like the patience you exude while waiting for your Hot Pocket dinner's to heat to perfection) you'd likely see plenty of progress.
This is what you asked for... now you don't want it?
There is a fundamental difference between giving new, rising,
competent talent a chance to shine and throwing two greener than grass "characters" into prominent positions in the companys biggest heel faction straight away. Then, based on a similar level of non-performance, grant them contracts that other more deserving young wrestlers would probably (and often do) kill themselves for. There should be (and in fact, is) a middle ground here with which to work.
Maybe I'm a bit too
old school, but from what I remember in my 22 years as a wrestling fan, so much so soon often eventually translates into
so fired. Gunner and Murphy
may be a great tag team in the making. Maybe they will progressively get better and be equal parts imposing and impressive in a year or two.
But lets get to the heart of things here. Neither one of these kids are standouts in any currently measurable way. It's arguable that they have "the look", but so many other guys before (and I'm sure, after) them could not sustain careers by only looking the part. Particularly in TNA, where there appears to be a higher emphasis on wrestling as opposed to "sports entertainment", these guys are no where near ready to be thrusted in the position they now find themselves in.
Look, I'm not saying they shouldn't have been given contracts
ever. It would be silly to write them off that quickly. There is quite a bit that we haven't seen of Gunner and Murphy and this is important surely. My point of contention is with the fact that, seemingly out of the blue, they were granted long-term (even if that translates into a single year) contracts when they've really done nothing of note so far. They haven't had a stand-out match yet, they're not "hot" on the indy scene with a local following, and as fans, we have no clue what kind of personality they can exude.
Pay-per-appearance was working just fine for the roles they currently fill in the company. Further experimentation under this agreement to see if they could become something more than "hired goons" would've been the next logical step. Why contracts, why them, why right now?