JJYanks121
The Mouth of the South Shore
A common theme I perceived while navigating these boards is the love of heels. Now obviously, internet wrestling fans can appreciate the work and effort that goes into somebody portraying a heel, but it seems this respect and admiration has gone too far.
What I mean is that all too often there are threads about performers and these lines are muttered ad nauseum:
"he is better as a heel"
"they should turn him heel"
"he is stale as a face"
"he NEEDS to be a heel"
While I agree that some people have done better work as heels, it must be pointed out that be a heel is actually the easier trade. To get a crowd to love you can often be difficult, but to get a crowd to hate you can be as simple as picking on a crowd favorite or the crowd themselves.
It is great that some people thrive as heels, but what I want to know is why EVERYONE seemingly has to be a heel. It is to the point of absurdity when you come on the boards Monday night and there were some hoping Triple H would turn on his best friend and ruin his retirement simply because "he's better as a heel" It is ridiculous and it makes me wonder if the IWC prefers ANYONE as a face.
My question is: Is there anybody that you prefer as a face? To qualify this statement, let's try and keep this relatively current and let's keep it to guys who have been both face and heel. Also, as long as it doesn't get too far off topic, perhaps enlighten me on the obsession with heels and why everyone should be a heel. At the risk of being too sarcastic, if the IWC had its way, there would be no babyfaces. There would just be a lot of bad guys running around killing each other.
If you want to even take it further, break down the WWE main event scene and tell me who should be heel and who should be face. Let's get some opinions going and I'm really interested to see who some of you actually prefer as faces.
What I mean is that all too often there are threads about performers and these lines are muttered ad nauseum:
"he is better as a heel"
"they should turn him heel"
"he is stale as a face"
"he NEEDS to be a heel"
While I agree that some people have done better work as heels, it must be pointed out that be a heel is actually the easier trade. To get a crowd to love you can often be difficult, but to get a crowd to hate you can be as simple as picking on a crowd favorite or the crowd themselves.
It is great that some people thrive as heels, but what I want to know is why EVERYONE seemingly has to be a heel. It is to the point of absurdity when you come on the boards Monday night and there were some hoping Triple H would turn on his best friend and ruin his retirement simply because "he's better as a heel" It is ridiculous and it makes me wonder if the IWC prefers ANYONE as a face.
My question is: Is there anybody that you prefer as a face? To qualify this statement, let's try and keep this relatively current and let's keep it to guys who have been both face and heel. Also, as long as it doesn't get too far off topic, perhaps enlighten me on the obsession with heels and why everyone should be a heel. At the risk of being too sarcastic, if the IWC had its way, there would be no babyfaces. There would just be a lot of bad guys running around killing each other.
If you want to even take it further, break down the WWE main event scene and tell me who should be heel and who should be face. Let's get some opinions going and I'm really interested to see who some of you actually prefer as faces.